TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934

☑ Filed by the registrant            ☐ Filed by a party other than the registrant
  Filed by the registrant                   Filed by a party other than the registrant

Check the appropriate box:
 ☐
Preliminary Proxy Statement
 ☐
CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14A-6(E)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
 ☐
Definitive Additional Materials
 ☐
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12

JACK IN THE BOX INC.


(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of filing fee (check the appropriate box):
No fee required.
 ☐
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11

(1)
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)
Total fee paid:

 ☐
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 ☐
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)
Amount Previously Paid:

(2)
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)
Filing Party:

(4)
Date Filed:



TABLE OF CONTENTS

LOGO


JACK IN THE BOX INC.
January 25, 2018

31, 2022

Dear Fellow Stockholder:

We invite you to attend the Jack in the Box Inc. 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The meeting will be held on Tuesday, February 27, 2018,Friday, March 4, 2022, at 8:30 a.m. Pacific Standard Time atTime. The Annual Meeting will be a completely “virtual meeting” of stockholders. You will be able to attend the officesannual meeting as well as vote and submit your questions during the live webcast of Jackthe meeting by visiting http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JACK2022 and entering the 16-digit control number included in our Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card, or in the Box Inc., 9330 Balboa Avenue, San Diego, CA 92123. instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.
In the following pages, you will find the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders as well as a Proxy Statement describing the business to be conducted at the meeting. We have also enclosed a copy of our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2017,3, 2021, for your information.

To assure that your shares are represented at the meeting, please mark your choices on the enclosed proxy card, sign and date the card, and return it promptly in the postage-paid envelope provided. We also offer stockholders the opportunity to vote their shares over the Internet or by telephone. Please see the Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card for details about voting. If you hold your shares through an account with a broker, bank, or other financial institution, please follow the instructions you receive from them to vote your shares. If you are able to attend the virtual meeting and wish to vote your shares in person,then, you may do so at any time before the proxy is voted at the meeting.

Sincerely,

LOGO

Leonard A. Comma

Chairman

Thank you for your continued support of Jack in the Board and Box.
Sincerely,

Darin S. Harris
Chief Executive Officer

Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials


for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on February 27, 2018

March 4, 2022

The Jack in the Box Inc. Proxy Statement and Annual Report onForm 10-K for the


fiscal year ended October 1, 2017,3, 2021, are available electronically at


http://investors.jackinthebox.com

INFORMATION REGARDING ADMISSION TO THE ANNUAL MEETING

Everyone attending the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be required to present both proof of ownership of Jack in the Box Inc. Common Stock and a valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other financial institution, you will need a recent brokerage statement or letter from such entity reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date. If you do not have both proof of ownership of Jack in the Box Inc. stock and a valid picture identification, you may be denied admission to the Annual Meeting.

Cameras, sound or video recording devices, and large bags or packages will not be allowed in the meeting room.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Page

8

8

12

13

14

14

15

20

20

20

20

21

21

22

22

23

23

24

25

25

25
26
29
30
Page

34

35

39

40

41

43

44

48

52

53

54

54

56

57

58

58

59

60
66
69

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

69

69

TABLE OF CONTENTS


JACK IN THE BOX INC.

9330 Balboa Avenue


9357 Spectrum Center Blvd
San Diego, California 92123

LOGO


NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held February 27, 2018

March 4, 2022

The 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Jack in the Box Inc. will be held on Tuesday, February 27, 2018,Friday, March 4, 2022, at 8:30 a.m. Pacific Standard Time, atTime. The Annual Meeting will be a completely “virtual meeting” of stockholders. You will be able to attend the offices of Jack inAnnual Meeting, vote, and submit your questions during the Box Inc., 9330 Balboa Avenue, San Diego, CA 92123Annual Meeting via live webcast by visiting http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JACK2022. The Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes:

1.

To elect the nineeight Directors specified in this Proxy Statement to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors are elected and qualified;

2.

To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018;

October 2, 2022;

3.

To provide an advisory vote regarding the compensation of our named executive officers (“Say on Pay”) for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2017,3, 2021, as set forth in the Proxy Statement; and

4.

To amend the Jack in the Box Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan to extend the date by which awards may be granted through December 31, 2022.

5.
To vote on a stockholder proposal requesting that all stockholder meetings be held, either in whole or in part, through virtual means and that virtual attendance be allowed;
6.
To vote on a stockholder proposal requesting that we issue a report regarding developing a sustainable packaging policy; and
7.
To consider such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

These matters are more fully described in the attached Proxy Statement, which is made a part of this notice.

Our Board of Directors recommends a vote“FOR” “FOR” proposals 1 through 3.4, makes no recommendation on proposal 5, and recommends a vote “AGAINST” proposal 6. You are entitled to vote at the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) only if you were a Jack in the Box Inc. stockholder as of the close of business on December 29, 2017,January 7, 2022, the record date for the Annual Meeting. A complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder, for any purpose relating to the Annual Meeting, at the Annual Meeting, and for a period of ten days prior to the Annual Meeting, during regular business hours at our principal offices located at 9330 Balboa Avenue,9357 Spectrum Center Blvd, San Diego, CACalifornia 92123.

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote your shares via the toll-free telephone number, over the Internet, or by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible in the envelope provided.

San Diego, California


January 25, 2018

31, 2022

By order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

Phillip H. Rudolph

Executive


Sarah L. Super
Senior Vice President, Chief Legal & Risk Officer and Corporate Secretary

INFORMATION REGARDING ADMISSION TO THE ANNUAL MEETING

Everyone attending the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be required to present both proof of ownership of Jack in the Box Inc. Common Stock and a valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other financial institution, you will need a recent brokerage statement or letter from such entity reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date. If you do not have both proof of ownership of Jack in the Box Inc. stock and a valid picture identification, you may be denied admission to the Annual Meeting.

Cameras, sound or video recording devices, and large bags or packages will not be allowed in the meeting room.


TABLE OF CONTENTS


PROXY SUMMARY

PROXY SUMMARY

This is a summary only and does not contain all of the information that you should consider in connection with this Proxy Statement. Please read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

  Time and Date

8:30 a.m. P.S.T., February 27, 2018

March 4, 2022
  Place
Live webcast at http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JACK2022

  Record date   Place

9330 Balboa Avenue, San Diego, California 92123

January 7, 2022
  Voting

   Record date

December 29, 2017

   Voting

Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals.

   Admission

Proof of ownership and picture identification is required to enter Jack in the Box Inc.’s annual meeting.

proposals

Voting Matters


Stockholders are being asked to vote on the following matters:

Items of Business

Our Board’s Recommendation

1.
Election of Directors (page 14)

17)
FOR all Nominees

2.
Ratification of KPMG LLP as Independent Registered Public Accountants for FY 20182022 (page 31)

36)
FOR

3.
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (page 32)

37)
FOR
4.
Amendment to 2004 Stock Incentive Plan to Extend Date by Which Awards May Be Granted Through December 31, 2022 (page 76)
FOR
5.
Stockholder Proposal Regarding Virtual Meetings (page 85)
NO RECOMMENDATION
6.
Stockholder Proposal Regarding the Issuance of a Report on Sustainable Packaging (page 87)
AGAINST

Stockholders also will transact any other business that may properly come before the meeting.

How to Vote


You are entitled to vote at the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on December 29, 2017,January 7, 2022, the record date for the meeting. On the record date, there were 29,532,155approximately 21,102,348 shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting.Annual Meeting. For more details on voting and the annual meetingAnnual Meeting logistics, refer to the “Questions and Answers” section of this Proxy Statement.



2    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


2 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY SUMMARY  STATEMENT


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY SUMMARY

Corporate Governance Highlights

We are

Jack in the Box Inc. (“Jack in the Box” or the “Company”) is committed to good corporate governance, which we believe promotes the long-term interests of stockholders and strengthens Board and Management accountability. We believe good governance also fosters trust in the Company by all our stakeholders, including our guests, employees, franchisees, suppliers and the communities we serve. The “Corporate Governance” section of this Proxy Statement describes our governance framework, which includes the following features:

    Annual election of directors, with majority voting

     Annual assessment of Board leadership structure

    8 of 9 independent directors

     Annual Board, committee and individual director evaluations

    Regular executive sessions of independent directors

     Policy requiring long-tenured directors (more than 12 years on the Board) to submit voluntary offer to resign and be reviewed by Nominating & Governance Committee with respect to continued effectiveness

    Annual evaluation of CEO/Chairman by independent directors

     Lead independent director with restaurant and franchise experience and oversight of independent directors’ executive sessions and information flow to the Board

    Policy restricting directors to service on no more than three other public company boards

     Risk oversight by full Board and designated committees

    No supermajority standards — stockholders may amend bylaws or charter by majority vote

     No poison pill in place

    Stockholder right to act by written consent

     Prohibition of hedging, pledging and short sales by Section 16 officers and directors

    CEO/Chair and other members of Management regularly meet with the investment community, and Board is informed of feedback through Investor Relations update at each Board meeting

     Formal ethics Code of Conduct, ethics hotline and ethics training and communications to all employees to reinforce a culture of integrity


Annual election of directors with majority voting

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT3

Seven of our eight current directors are independent


Independent Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
Regular executive sessions of independent directors
Annual evaluation of CEO and Non-Executive Chairman by independent directors
Policy restricting directors to service on no more than three other public company boards
No supermajority standards — stockholders may amend bylaws or charter by majority vote
Stockholder right to act by written consent
CEO and other members of Management regularly meet with the investment community, and Board is informed of feedback through Investor Relations updates at each Board meeting
Annual assessment of Board leadership structure
Annual Board, committee, and individual director evaluations
Policy requiring long-tenured directors (more than 12 years on the Board) to submit voluntary offer to resign and be reviewed by Nominating & Governance Committee with respect to continued effectiveness
Risk oversight by full Board and designated committees
No poison pill in place
Prohibition of hedging, pledging and short sales by Section 16 officers and by Company directors
Formal ethics Code of Conduct, ethics hotline, and ethics training and communications to all employees to reinforce a culture of integrity
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY SUMMARY

Fiscal 20172021 Review

Returns to Stockholders


The Company’sstock price increased 6.2% to $101.92 per share at fiscalyear-end (“FYE”) 2017, versus $95.94 at FYE 2016, on top of a 20.4% increase in FY 2016.

We returned more than $376 million incash to stockholders during fiscal 2017, including over $327 million in share buybacks and over $49 million in dividends.

Financial and Operational Results

While we made progress on key strategic initiatives, fiscal 2017Fiscal 2021 was aanother uniquely challenging year for the Company.

Systemwide same-store sales grew 0.5% atrestaurant industry, but due to our innovation, perseverance, and continued focus on making significant progress on our strategic pillars and growth objectives, it was also a very exciting year for Jack in the Box, (“JIB”)our employees, franchisees, and the communities in which we operate, as we laid much of the foundation for the brand’s future success.

In spite of significant challenges posed by the COVID pandemic, fiscal 2021 included many achievements. We continued to successfully execute on our growth strategy by, among other things, improving our relationship and alignment with franchisees, kickstarting our unit growth strategy, creating modular and flexible restaurant designs, and enhancing the digital experience for our guests. Furthermore, we strengthened our uniquely broad menu, with the addition of Spicy Tiny Tacos and an improved Cluck Sandwich, as well as the return of Popcorn Chicken and Monster Tacos.
Our marketing and advertising efforts during fiscal 2021 – including the “Jackletes” college athlete platform, owning Chicken (Alaska), but declined 1.4% at Qdoba.

and a partnership with musician and viral star Jason Derulo – also built brand awareness and drove sales. In addition to these accomplishments, we also continued to drive systemwide financial and operational performance, and for the eleventh consecutive year, we achieved same-store sales growth.

Returns to Stockholders
The Company returned approximately $237.6 million to shareholders through stock buybacks and dividends in Fiscal 2021 and continues to offer a viable long-term opportunity for shareholders seeking a value-oriented stock with a new, growth-focused strategy in place.
Financial and Operational Results
Systemwide sales increased 13.1% year-over-year. The increase is inclusive of the favorable 53rd week in the fourth quarter of 2021, which resulted in incremental systemwide sales of $77.9 million. Excluding the 53rd week, systemwide sales in fiscal 2021 increased 11.0% year-over-year.

Consolidated restaurant operating margin (“ROM”)

System same-store sales1(1) declined 260 basis points to 17.6%increased 10.3% year-over-year, marking the eleventh consecutive year of same-store sales with JIB margin down 110 basis points to 20.1% of sales, and Qdoba margins down 450 basis points to 13.6% of sales.

growth.

Total revenues increased 12.0% year-over-year. The increase is inclusive of the favorable 53rd week in the fourth quarter of 2021, which resulted in incremental revenue of approximately $21.3 million.

Operating Earnings Per Share (“Operating EPS”)2 of $3.88

Net earnings and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”)(2)increased approximately 3% over prior year, excluding84.7% and 90.9% year-over-year, respectively.
Earnings from operations increased 25.7% year-over-year.
Adjusted EBITDA(3) increased 20.9% year-over-year to $331.4 million. The increase is inclusive of the $0.09 benefit from thefavorable 53rd week in fiscal 2016.

the fourth quarter of 2021, which resulted in incremental Adjusted EBITDA of $5.6 million.

Restaurant level margin(4) decreased 40 basis points year-over-year to 24.2% of company-owned restaurant sales.
Franchise level margin(4) increased 210 basis points year-over-year to 42.0%, or $317.6 million.

The Company made progress onkey strategic initiatives, including reducing our corporate general

Net units decreased 1.0% year-over-year with 37 closures and administrative expenses (“G&A”), and refranchising 178 JIB restaurants which increased our franchise mix from 82% at14 store openings during the end of fiscal 2016 to 88% at 2017 fiscalyear-end.year.

Impact on Incentive Compensation

The Operating EPS result was just slightly above the minimum threshold goal for annual incentive compensation.

The Company fell short of its threshold goals on systemwide sales and ROM at both brands.

As a result, the CEO and other Brand Services named executive officers (“NEOs”) received annual incentive payouts of less than 9% of target, and the Jack in the Box and Qdoba brand presidents received less than 4% of target.

Other

During fiscal 2017, the Company retained Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC to assist our Board of Directors in its evaluation of potential strategic alternatives with respect to the Qdoba business, as well as other ways to enhance shareholder value. Following the completion of a robust process, our Board determined that the sale of Qdoba is the best alternative for enhancing shareholder value and is consistent with our desire to transition to a less capital-intensive business model. In December 2017, we announced that the Company had entered into an agreement to sell Qdoba Restaurant Corporation for approximately $305 million in cash. The transaction is expected to close by April 2018.

Consistent with the fundamental principle that compensation programs should align pay with performance, the Company’s fiscal 2017 performance directly impacted compensation decisions and pay outcomes as described in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) starting on page 34.

1
(1)

Restaurant operating margin

System same-store sales represents changes in sales at company and franchise restaurants open more than one year. Franchise sales represent sales at franchise restaurants and are revenues of our franchisees. We do not record franchise sales as revenues; however, our royalty revenues and percentage rent revenues are calculated based on a percentage of franchise sales. We believe system same-store sales information is useful to investors as it has a direct effect on the Company’s profitability.
non-GAAP(2) measure,
Fiscal year 2020 Diluted EPS included non-recurring items, notably a pension settlement charge and is defined by the Company as company restaurant sales less expenses incurred directly by oursale of a corporate office building, that affect the comparability to fiscal year 2021 Diluted EPS.
(3)
Adjusted EBITDA represents net earnings on a GAAP basis excluding income taxes, interest expense, net, gains or losses on the sale of company-operated restaurants, in generating those sales (food and packaging costs, payroll and employee benefits costs, and occupancyimpairment and other costs). For a reconciliationcharges, net, depreciation and amortization, the amortization of this measurefranchise tenant improvement allowances and other, and pension settlement charges. See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measurements to consolidatedGAAP Results.”
(4)
Restaurant level margin and franchise level margin are non-GAAP measures. These non-GAAP measures are reconciled to earnings from operations, the most comparable GAAP measure, please seein the attachment to this release. See “Reconciliation ofNon-GAAP Measurements to GAAP Results” attachment to the Company’s Current Report on Form8-K and accompanying press release filed November 29, 2017.

Results.”
2
(5)

Operating EPSEBIT is anon-GAAP measure and is defined by the Company as diluted EPS from continuing operations on a GAAP basisnet earnings before interest expense, net and income taxes, excluding restructuring charges and gains or losses from refranchising. For a reconciliationon the sale of this measure to diluted earnings per share from continuing operations,company operated restaurants and/or the most comparable GAAP measure, please seesale of the “Reconciliation ofNon-GAAP Measurements to GAAP Results” attachmentcorporate office facility, restructuring costs and/or other non-recurring charges, any gain or loss associated with the Company’s corporate-owned life insurance policies (COLI), net period benefit costs/credits or settlement gain/loss related to the Company’s Current Report on Form8-Kpension and accompanying press release filed November 29, 2017.

post-retirement health plans, and earnings or losses from discontinued operations. See “Appendix A — Reconciliation of non-GAAP measurements to GAAP Results.”



4    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


4 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY SUMMARY  STATEMENT


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY SUMMARY
Incentive Compensation Results
Annual Incentive Plan – Weighted payout equal to 143.3% of target payout for our CEO and 179.2% of target payout for our other NEOs, as described further in footnote 1 below.
Accounting
Performance Period
Performance Metric
Weight
Target Goal
Result
Actual % of
Target Payout(1)
Financial Goals - (Q1 and Q2)
(First Half of fiscal year)
Operating EBIT
System Same-Store Sales
50%
30%
$125.8 million
10.4%
$144.7 million
15.9%
150% / 200%
150% / 200%
Financial Goals - (Q3 and Q4)
(Second Half of fiscal year)
Operating EBIT
System Same-Store Sales
50%
$125.0 million
$132.0 million
150% / 200%
30%
4.0%
4.8%
120% / 140%
Strategic Goals - Annual
(Full fiscal year)
Three Goals (*)
Be a Great Franchisor
Brand Position and Strategy
Ignite Development and Growth
20%

Pre-established
Performance
Expectations

Maximum
Target
Maximum

150%
100%
150%
(1)
The maximum incentive payout for our CEO for both financial and strategic goals is 150% of target payout; and for our other NEOs, the maximum payout is 200% of target payout for financial goals and 150% of target payout for strategic goals. As performance and payouts are prorated between performance levels, for our CEO, this resulted in a lower percentage of target payout on the System Same-Store Sales goal for the second half of the fiscal year than our other NEOs.
(*)
The Committee awarded target payout for the Brand Position and Strategy goal, and maximum payout for the Be A Great Franchisor and Ignite Development and Growth goals, based on the pre-established expectations of performance to attain threshold, target, and maximum payout on each of the goals, as described in CD&A Section VI.b.
Long-Term Incentive Plan – For performance shares (“PSUs”) vested and payable in 2021 (granted in November 2018 for the three-fiscal year performance period FY2019-FY2021), the weighted payout resulted in 131.0% of the target number of PSUs granted. Mr. Gordon is the only NEO who received this payout.
Performance Metric
Weight
Target Goal
Results
Payout % of
PSUs Granted
Adjusted Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) from Operations(6)
(ROIC at FYE 2021)
50%
22.5%
46.8%
150.0%
Systemwide Sales ($M)
(Goals set annually)
Year 1 - 16.7%
$3,566.0
$3,504.7
69.3%
Year 2 - 16.7%
$3,631.0
$3,672.7
116.5%
Year 3 - 16.7%
$3,933.0
$4,155.3
150.0%
Leadership Transitions
During fiscal 2021, Mr. Harris focused on building a senior executive leadership team that possessed the key skills, knowledge, and experience to strengthen the Company’s relationship with its franchisees and to grow the brand over the long-term, resulting in several leadership changes:
On January 18, 2021, Mr. Mullany commenced employment as our new Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Ms. Hooper completed her assignment as Interim PFO, returning to her position as Vice President, Controller and Financial Reporting.
On February 1, 2021, Mr. Ostrom commenced employment as our new Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer.
On April 26, 2021, Mr. Piano commenced employment as our new Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer.
Mr. Martin (Former CIO) separated employment with the Company on May 7, 2021.
(6)
Adjusted ROIC from Operations is calculated as after-tax earnings from operations, excluding gains or losses on the sale of company-operated restaurants and restructuring charges, divided by average invested capital (which excludes accumulated other comprehensive income or loss related to the Company’s retirement plans).
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY SUMMARY
Board Nominees(Proposal 1)


We understand the importance of having a Board comprised of talented people with the highest integrity and the necessary skills and qualifications to oversee our business. The following table provides summary information about our director nominees (all current Directors), who have a diverse and balanced skill set including extensive financial, marketing, consumer brand, franchise, restaurant and retail experience. We encourage you to review the qualifications, skills and experience of each of our Directors on pages15-19.

Name Age   Director  
Since  
 Principal Occupation Independent   Committee
Memberships  
 

Other Public  

Company

Boards

     AC  CC  NG  FC  EC  
           

Leonard A. Comma

(Chairman of the Board)

 48 2014 

CEO,

Jack in the Box Inc.

 No         LOGO -
           

David L. Goebel

(Lead Director)

 67 2008 

Partner & Faculty Member,

Merryck & Co. Ltd.

 Yes   x x   x Wingstop Inc.
           

Sharon P. John

 53 2014 

President & CEO,

Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. 

 Yes   x x     Build-a-Bear

Workshop, Inc.

           

Madeleine A. Kleiner

 66 2011 

Director

(Retired hotel & banking

executive attorney)

 Yes   x LOGO     Northrop

Grumman

Corp.

           

Michael W. Murphy

 60 2002 

President & CEO,

Sharp HealthCare

 Yes LOGO   x   x -
           

James M. Myers

 60 2010 

Chairman of the Board,

Petco

 Yes x     x   -
           

David M. Tehle

 61 2004 

Director

(Retired retail CFO)

 Yes x     LOGO   Genesco Inc.,
US Foods Holding
Corp.,
National Vision, Inc.
           

John T. Wyatt

 62 2010 

CEO, Knowledge Universe

— United States

 Yes   LOGO   x   -
           

Vivien M. Yeung

 45 2017 General Manager, Venture, Lululemon Athletica Inc. Yes x   x      

page 18.
Name
Age
Director
Since
Principal Occupation
Independent
Committee
Memberships
Other Public
Company
Boards
AC
CC
NG
FC
David L. Goebel
(Non-Executive
Chairman of the Board)
71
2008
Partner & Faculty Member,
ExCo Leadership Group
Yes
x
x
 Murphy USA Inc.
 Wingstop Inc.
Darin S. Harris
53
2020
CEO, Jack in the Box Inc.
No
-
Sharon P. John
57
2014
President & CEO,
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
Yes
x
X
  Build-a-Bear
Workshop, Inc.
Madeleine A. Kleiner
70
2011
Director
(Retired hotel & banking
executive attorney)
Yes
X
  Northrop Grumman
Corp.
Michael W. Murphy
64
2002
Director
(Retired President & CEO
Sharp HealthCare)
Yes
x
-
James M. Myers
64
2010
Director
(Retired retail CEO and
Board Chair)
Yes
x
-
David M. Tehle
65
2004
Director
(Retired retail CFO)
Yes
x
 National Vision, Inc.
 US Foods Holding
Corp.
Vivien M. Yeung
49
2017
EVP, Chief Strategy Officer,
Kohl’s Corporation
Yes
x
x
-
✪ Chair

LOGO     Chair

AC Audit Committee

FC Finance Committee

x  Member

CC Compensation Committee

EC    Executive Committee

NG Nominating and Governance Committee

Director Attendance— During the time each director nominee served on the Board in fiscal 2017,2021, each attended more than 75% of the meetings of the Board and committees on which he or she sits.served.
6 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY SUMMARY
Board Composition Our Board has a mix of relatively newer and longer-tenured directors. The charts below show Board makeup for 2021 by various characteristics. The average tenure of the Board of Directors is 10.5 years while the average age is 61.5 years. For more information on our philosophy regarding the recruitment and diversity of Board members and our Board refreshment policies, please see pages23-25.27.

LOGO



Director Tenure Average Tenure: 7.5 years Average Age: 58 years Independence Gender

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT5


Board Diversity Matrix (As of January 7, 2022)
Total Number of Directors
8
 
Female
Male
Non-Binary
Did Not
Disclose
Gender
Part I: Gender Identity
Directors
3
5
0
0
Part II: Demographic Background
African American or Black
0
0
0
0
Alaskan Native or Native American
0
0
0
0
Asian
1
0
0
0
Hispanic or Latinx
0
0
0
0
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
0
0
0
0
White
2
5
0
0
Two or More Races or Ethnicities
0
0
0
0
LGBTQ+
0
Did Not Disclose Demographic Background
0

  PROXY SUMMARY  

Auditors(Proposal 2)


We are asking our stockholders to ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accountants for fiscal 2018.2022. Although stockholder ratification of the appointment is not required, the Audit Committee believes it is appropriate to seek such ratification. Additional information is provided onpages 29-31.

36.
2021 Auditor Fees
2017 Auditor
Audit Fees
$1,091,883

  Audit Fees

$1,098,414  

  Qdoba Audit Fees (1)

880,000  

Tax or Other Fees

          612  

$

Securitization Related Audit Fees
$110,000
KPMG Total Fees

$1,979,026  

(1)

Qdoba Audit Fees are described in the “Independent Registered Public Accountants Fees and Services” section.

$1,201,883
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY SUMMARY
Executive Compensation Highlights(Proposal 3)


The Company seeks anon-binding advisory vote from its stockholders to approve the compensation of our NEOs for fiscal 20172021 (“Say on Pay”). The Board values stockholders’ opinions, and the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the advisory vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.

Our CD&A, starting at page 39, describes the compensation decision-making process, details our programs and policies, and includes an illustration of our compensation framework and key fiscal 2021 performance measures and pay actions.

Our CD&A describes the compensation decision-making process, details our programs and policies, and includes an illustration of ourcompensation framework and key fiscal 2017 performance measures and pay actions on page 36.

Our executivecompensation programs are built on the following principles and objectives:

Competitive target pay structure, including base salary, annual incentive, and long-term incentives that enable us to attract and retain talented, experienced executives who can deliver successful business performance and drive long-termlong- term stockholder value.

Pay for performance alignment, with a higher percentagethe largest proportion of executive pay in the form of annual and long-term incentives that directly tie payouts, if any, to the achievement of incentive goals.

corporate goals and strategies.

Comprehensive goal setting, with financial, operating,operational, and strategic performance metrics that drive long-term stockholder value.

Executive alignment with stockholders, through stock ownership and holding requirements.

requirements that build and maintain an executive’s equity investment in the company.

Incentivizingbalanced short-short-term and long-term executive decision-making, through variable compensation components (cash and stock) using varying timeframes.

Sound governance practices and principles in plan design and pay decisions, with the Compensation Committee considering both what and how performance is achieved.

Management of compensation risk, by establishing incentive goals that avoid placing too much emphasis on any one metric or performance time horizon, thereby discouraging excessive or unwise risk-taking.

Our stockholders approved each of the prior fourfive years’ Say on Pay proposals by over 96%90% of votes cast.



6    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


8 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY SUMMARY  STATEMENT


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY SUMMARY

Compensation Governance Practices


The company has several governance practices that we believe support the soundness and efficacy of our compensation programs. In short:

 What We Do

   What We Don’t Do

Compensation Committee composed entirely of independent directors, who meet regularly in executive session without Management present.Pages 22, 4323, 50.

 Section 16 officers and directors are prohibited from hedging, pledging or holding Company stock in margin accounts.Page 49.

Independent compensation consultant who works exclusively for the Compensation Committee (no other work for the Company).Page 4350.

 No dividends or dividend equivalents are paid on unvested restricted stock units (RSUs) or performance share units. Page 41.

Robust stock ownership and holding requirements.Page 4857.

 Nore-pricing of equity without stockholder approval.Page 33.

Compensation Risk Committee that analyzes compensation plans, programs, policies and practices.Page 5363.

 The Company ceased providing taxgross-up provisions in compensation arrangements entered into in 2009 and later, except related to relocation expenses (which require Compensation Committee approval in the case of executive officers).Page 51.

Compensation Committee discretion to reduce payouts under incentive plans.Page 5363.

 No single trigger change in control accelerated vesting of RSUs and options. Since 2014, all RSUs and options awards that provide for vesting upon a change in control require a “double trigger” (termination and consummation of the change in control).Page 61.

Clawback policy providing ability to recover incentive cash compensation and performance-based equity awards based on financial results that were subsequently restated due to fraud or intentional misconduct.Page 5063.

Annual incentive and long-term incentive compensation based on rigorous performance goals that are key metrics for business success and include maximum payout caps. Page 63.
☒ What We Don’t Do
Section 16 officers and directors are prohibited from hedging, pledging, or holding Company stock in margin accounts. Pages 58, 63.
No dividends or dividend equivalents are paid on unvested restricted stock units (RSUs) or performance shares. Page 48.
No re-pricing of equity is permitted without stockholder approval. Page 38.
No tax gross-ups except in the case of qualified relocation expenses (which requires Compensation Committee approval in the case of executive officers). Page 65.
No RSUs or options awards provide for vesting upon a change in control without a “double trigger” (termination and consummation of the change in control) unless the award is not assumed or substituted for by the acquirer. Pages 70-71.
Amendment to 2004 Stock Incentive Plan to Extend Date by Which Awards May Be Granted Through December 31, 2022 (Proposal 4)
The Company seeks approval from its stockholders to amend the Jack in the Box Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan to extend the date by which awards may be granted through December 31, 2022. Additional information is available on pages 76-84.
Stockholder Proposal Regarding Virtual Meetings (Proposal 5)
The Company received a stockholder proposal from The Humane Society of the United States (the “HSUS Proposal”). Additional information regarding the HSUS Proposal is provided on pages 85-86.
Stockholder Proposal Regarding the Issuance of a Report on Sustainable Packaging (Proposal 6)
The Company received a stockholder proposal from Green Century Capital Management, Inc. (the “Green Century Proposal”). Additional information regarding the Green Century Proposal is provided on pages 87-88.
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY SUMMARY
Additional Information


Please see the Questions“Questions and Answers” section that immediately follows for important information about the proxy materials, voting, the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, Company documents, communications, and the deadlines to submit stockholder proposals for the 20192023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
10 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS


JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT7



  QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS  

JACK IN THE BOX INC.

9330 Balboa Avenue

9357 Spectrum Center Blvd

San Diego, California 92123

PROXY STATEMENT

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

February  27, 2018

March 4, 2022
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Proxy Materials and Voting Information

1.
Why am I receiving these materials?

We sent you these proxy materials because the Board of Directors (sometimes referred to as the “Board”) of Jack in the Box Inc. (sometimes referred to as the “Company,” “Jack in the Box,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) and at any postponements or adjournments of the Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held on February 27, 2018,March 4, 2022, at 8:30 a.m. Pacific Standard Time via live webcast at our corporate headquarters located at 9330 Balboa Avenue, San Diego, CA 92123.http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JACK2022. You will need the 16-digit control number provided on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, your proxy card, or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. If you held shares of our common stock on December 29, 2017January 7, 2022 (the “Record Date”), you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and vote on
the proposals

described below under the heading “What are my voting choices for each of the items to be voted on at the 20182022 Annual Meeting?” However, you do not need to attend the Annual Meeting to vote your shares. Instead, you may complete, sign, date, and return the enclosed proxy card. You may also vote before the Annual Meeting over the Internet or by telephone.

The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Notice”), Proxy Statement, the enclosed proxy card, and our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2017,3, 2021, will be mailed to stockholders on or about January 25, 2018.

31, 2022.

2.
Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?

If you were a holder of Jack in the Box common stock (the “Common Stock”) either as astockholder of recordor as thebeneficial owner of shares held in Street nameas of the close of business on December 29, 2017,January 7, 2022, the Record Date for the Annual Meeting, you may vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 29,532,155

approximately

21,102,348 shares of Common Stock outstanding, excluding treasury shares. Company treasury shares will not be voted. Each stockholder has one vote for each share of Common Stock held as of the Record Date. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially in Street name.

3.
What does it mean to be a “stockholder of record”?

If, on the Record Date, your shares were registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, Computershare, then you are a “stockholder of record.” As a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the Annual

Meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to fill out and return the enclosed proxy card, or vote by telephone or Internet, to ensure your vote is counted.counted
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

8    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


4.

  QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS  

4.What does it mean to beneficially own shares in “Street name”?

If, on the Record Date, your shares were held in an account at a broker, bank, or other financial institution (we will refer to those organizations collectively as “broker”), then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “Street name” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by that broker. The broker holding your account is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker on how to vote the shares in your account. As a beneficial owner, you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not a stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you request

and obtain a validlegal proxy

from your broker giving you the legal right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting, as well as satisfy the Annual Meeting admission criteria set out in the Notice. Under the rules that govern brokers, your broker is not permitted to vote on your behalf on any matter to be considered at the Annual Meeting (other than the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accountants for fiscal 2018)2022) unless you provide specific instructions to the broker as to how to vote. As a result, we encourage you to communicate your voting decisions to your broker before the date of the Annual Meeting to ensure that your vote will be counted.

5.
What are my voting choices for each of the items to be voted on at the 20182022 Annual Meeting?

Item 1: Election of Directors

 Vote in favor of all nominees;

 Vote in favor of specific nominees;

 Vote against all nominees;

 Vote against specific nominees;

 Abstain from voting with respect to all nominees; or

 Abstain from voting with respect to specific nominees.

The Board recommends a voteFORall Director nominees.

Item 2: Ratification of the Appointment of KPMG LLP as Independent Registered Public Accountants

 Vote in favor of ratification;

 Vote against the ratification; or

 Abstain from voting on the ratification.

The Board recommends a voteFORthe ratification.

Item 3: Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (“Say on Pay”)

 Vote in favor of the advisory proposal;

 Vote against the advisory proposal; or

 Abstain from voting on the advisory proposal.

The Board recommends a voteFORthe advisory approval of executive compensation.

Item 4: Amendment to 2004 Stock Incentive Plan to Extend Date by Which Awards May Be Granted Through December 31, 2022
 Vote in favor of the proposal.
 Vote against the proposal; or
 Abstain from voting on the proposal.
The Board recommends a vote FOR the proposal
Item 5: Stockholder Proposal Regarding Virtual Meetings
 Vote in favor of the proposal;
 Vote against the proposal; or
 Abstain from voting on the proposal.
The Board does not make a recommendation for the proposal.
Item 6: Stockholder Proposal Regarding the Issuance of a Report on Sustainable Packaging
 Vote in favor of the proposal;
 Vote against the proposal; or
 Abstain from voting on the proposal.
The Board recommends a vote AGAINST the proposal.

12 6.JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
6.
What if I return the proxy card to the Company but do not make specific choices?

If you return a signed, dated, proxy card to the Company without making any voting selections, the Company will vote your shares as follows:

“FOR”the election of all director nominees;

“FOR”the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018; and

October 2, 2022;

FOR,”FOR” on an advisory basis, approval of the compensation awarded to our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2017,3, 2021, as set forth in this Proxy Statement.

Statement;

JACK IN THE BOX INC.“FOR” the amendment to the Jack in the Box Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan to extend the date by which awards may be granted through December 31, 2022; and
ï“ABSTAIN” for   2018 PROXY STATEMENTthe stockholder proposal requesting that all stockholder meetings be held, in whole or in part, through virtual means.
9“AGAINST”

the stockholder proposal requesting that a report be issued regarding the Company’s sustainable packaging policy.


7.

  QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS  

7.Could any additional matters be raised at the 20182022 Annual Meeting?

We are not aware of any other matters to come before the Annual Meeting. If any matter not mentioned herein is properly brought before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the

enclosed proxy will have discretionary authority to vote all proxies with respect thereto and in accordance with their best judgment.

8.
What does it mean if I received more than one proxy card?

If you receive more than one proxy card, your shares are registered in more than one name or are registered in different

accounts. Please complete, sign and return each proxy card to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

9.
How are votes counted?

Votes will be counted by the inspector of election appointed for the Annual Meeting, who will separately count “FOR,” “AGAINST,” abstentions and brokernon-votes. A “brokernon-vote” non- vote” occurs when your broker submits a proxy card for your shares of Common Stock held in Street name but does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker has not received voting instructions from you and does not have the authority to vote on that matter without instructions. Under the rules that govern brokers who are voting shares held in Street name, brokers have the discretion to vote those shares on routine matters but not onnon-routine matters.

For purposes of these rules, the only routine matter in this Proxy Statement is the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accountants. Therefore, if you hold your shares in Street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker, your broker does not have discretion to vote your shares on any of the proposals at the Annual Meeting except the ratification of the appointment of independent registered public accountants. However, your shares will be considered present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum, as provided below.

Proposal Number
Item

Proposal 

Number

Item
Votes Required for Approval
Abstentions
Abstentions
Uninstructed
Shares
1
1

Election of 98 Directors

Majority of votes cast.

No effect.
No effect.
2
2
Ratification of the Appointment of KPMG LLP as Independent Registered Public Accountants
Majority of the voting power of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote.vote on the proposal.

Count as

votes against.

Discretionary voting by broker permitted.
3
3

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

Majority of the voting power of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote.vote on the proposal.

Count as

votes against.

No effect.
4.
Amendment to 2004 Stock Incentive Plan to Extend Date by Which Awards May Be Granted Through December 31, 2022
Majority of the voting power of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal.
Count as votes against.
No effect.
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Proposal Number
Item
Votes Required for Approval
Abstentions
Uninstructed
Shares
5
Stockholder Proposal Regarding Virtual Meetings
Majority of the voting power of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal.
Count as votes against.
No effect.
6.
Stockholder Proposal Regarding the Issuance of a Report on Sustainable Packaging
Majority of the voting power of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal.
Count as votes against.
No effect.

10.
How many shares must be present or represented to conduct business at the Annual Meeting?

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid annual meeting. A quorum will be present if the holders of at least a majority of the total number of shares of Common Stock entitled to vote are present, in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and shares represented by

broker non-

brokernon-votes

votes are counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present. If there are insufficient votes to constitute a quorum at the time of the Annual Meeting, we may adjourn the Annual Meeting to solicit additional proxies.

10    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


11.

  QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS  

11.How do I vote my shares of Jack in the Box Common Stock?

If you are a stockholder of record, you can vote in the following ways:

By Internet: by following the Internet voting instructions included in the proxy card at any time up until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on March 3, 2022.
By Telephone: by following the telephone voting instructions included in the proxy card at any time up until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on March 3, 2022.
By Mail: if you have received a printed copy of the proxy materials from us by mail, you may vote by mail by marking, dating, and signing your proxy card in accordance with the instructions on it and returning it by mail in the pre-addressed reply envelope provided with the proxy materials. The proxy card must be received prior to the Annual Meeting.

By Internet:During Live Webcast:  by following the Internet voting instructions included in the proxy card at any time up until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on February 26, 2018.

By Telephone: by following the telephone voting instructions included in the proxy card at any time up until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on February 26, 2018.

By Mail: if you have received a printed copy of the proxy materials from us by mail, youas this year’s Annual Meeting will be held entirely online, stockholders may vote by mail by marking, dating, and signing your proxy card in accordance with the instructions on it and returning it by mail in thepre-addressed reply envelope provided with the proxy materials. The proxy card must be received prior to the Annual Meeting.

In Person: if you satisfy the admission requirements toduring the Annual Meeting as described inby joining the Notice, you may vote your shares in personlive webcast at the meeting. Even if you plan to

attendfollowing site: http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JACK2022. To participate in the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote in advance by Internet, telephone or mail so thatwill need the 16- digit control number included on your vote will be counted in the event you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.

Notice, on your proxy card,

or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. Shares held in your name as the shareholder of record may be voted electronically during the Annual Meeting. Shares for which you are the beneficial owner but not the shareholder of record also may be voted electronically during the Annual Meeting. However, even if you plan to participate in the live webcast of the Annual Meeting, the Company recommends that you vote your shares in advance so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend.
If you are a beneficial owner, you can vote in the following way:

If your shares are held in Street name or through a benefit or compensation plan, your broker or your plan trustee should give you instructions for voting your shares. In these cases, you may vote by Internet, telephone or mail, as instructed by your broker, trustee, or other agent. Shares beneficially held through a benefit or compensation plan cannot be voted in person at the Annual Meeting. You may vote your shares beneficially held through your broker in person if you satisfy the admission requirements toat the Annual Meeting as described in the Notice, andif you obtain a valid legal proxy from your broker giving you the legal right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting.

12.
May I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

Yes.

If you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy by:

filing a written statement to that effect with our Corporate Secretary before the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting;

voting again via the Internet or telephone but before the closing of those voting facilities at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on February 26, 2018;

March 3, 2022;

attending
participating in the live webcast of the Annual Meeting at http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JACK2022 by

14 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
entering in the 16-digit control number included in your proxy materials, revoking your proxy, and voting in person (attendance atduring the Annual Meeting (joining the live webcast of the Annual Meeting, in and of itself, will not constitute a revocation of a proxy); or

timely submitting a properly signed proxy card with a later date that is received at or prior to the Annual Meeting.

The written statement or subsequent proxy should be delivered to Jack in the Box Inc., 9330 Balboa Avenue,9357 Spectrum Center Blvd., San Diego, CA 92123, Attention: Corporate Secretary, or hand delivered to the Corporate Secretary before the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting.

Secretary.

If you are a beneficial owner and hold shares through a broker, bank, or other financial institution,you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank, or other nominee. You may also change your vote or revoke your voting instructions in person atduring the live webcast of the Annual Meeting if you obtain a signed legal proxy from the broker, bank, or other nominee giving you the right to vote the shares.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT11


13.

  QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS  

13.Who will pay for the cost of soliciting proxies?

The Company will pay the cost of preparing, printing, and mailing the Notice and the proxy materials. Copies of solicitation materials will be furnished to banks, brokerage houses, fiduciaries, and custodians holding shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by others, to forward to such beneficial owners. The Company may reimburse persons representing beneficial owners of Common Stock for their costs of forwarding solicitation materials to the beneficial owners. If you choose to access proxy materials or vote over the Internet or by telephone, you are responsible for Internet or

telephone charges. We have engaged Innisfree M&A Incorporated (“Innisfree”), a proxy-solicitation firm, to provide advice to the Company with respect to the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and to assist us in the solicitation of proxies, for which the Company will pay a fee of $15,000 plus reimbursement of certainout-of-pocket expenses. In addition to solicitation by mail, proxies may be solicited personally, by telephone, or by Innisfree. They may also be solicited by directors, officers, or employees of the Company, who will receive no additional compensation for such activities.

14.
How can I find out the results of the Annual Meeting?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. We will publish final results in a Current Report onForm 8-K that we expect to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) within four business days of the Annual Meeting. After theForm 8-K is filed, you may obtain
a copy by visiting the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov,

visiting our website or contacting our Investor Relations Department by writing to Investor Relations Department, Jack in the Box Inc., 9330 Balboa Avenue,9357 Spectrum Center Blvd., San Diego, CA 92123, or by sending an email to investor.relations@jackinthebox.com.

15.
How can I obtain copies of the proxy statement or10-K?

A copy of this Proxy Statement and the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K (“Form10-K”) for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2017,3, 2021, are available free of charge on our website. These filings and all of our filings that are made electronically with the SEC, includingForms 10-K,10-Q10-K, 10-Q and8-K 8- K may be found athttp://investors.jackinthebox.com. Form10-K, 10- K, excluding exhibits, may also be obtained by stockholders without charge by written request sent to Investor Relations Department, Jack in the Box Inc., 9330 Balboa Avenue,9357 Spectrum Center Blvd., San Diego, CA 92123.

As permitted by SEC rules, if your stock is held by a brokerage firm or bank, a single copy of this Proxy Statement may be delivered to an address shared by two or more stockholders. If you prefer to receive separate copies of a Proxy Statement and/or Annual Report either now or in the future, please contact your brokerage or bank. The voting instruction sent to a Street-nameStreet- name stockholder should provide information on how to request (i) householding of future Company materials or (ii) separate materials if only one set of documents is being sent to a household.
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Annual Meeting Information

16.
How do I attend the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in person?Stockholders?

IMPORTANT NOTE: If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you must follow these instructionsinstructions.
The Annual Meeting will be a completely “virtual meeting” of stockholders. You will be able to gain admission.

All attendees will need to present proofattend the annual meeting as well as vote and submit your questions during the live webcast of ownershipthe meeting by visiting the following website: http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/JACK2022 and

entering the 16-digit control number included in our Notice of JackInternet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card, or in the Box Inc. Common Stock and a valid pictureidentification, such as a driver’s license or passport. If you do not have both proof of ownership of Jack in the Box Inc. stock and a valid picture identification, you may be denied admission to the Annual Meeting.

instructions that accompanied your proxy materials

Beneficial owners:If you are a beneficial owner, you will need to bring the notice or voting instruction form you received from your bank, broker or other nominee to be admitted to the meeting. You also may bring your bank or brokerage account statement reflecting your ownership of Common Stock as of December 29, 2017.

Attendance at the meeting is limited to stockholders as of the Record Date (December 29, 2017)(January 7, 2022) or their authorized named representatives. Cameras,Recording of the Annual Meeting by camera, sound, or video recording devices and large bags or packages will not be allowed in the meeting room.

is strictly prohibited.

12    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


  QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS  

Communications and Stockholder Proposals

17.
How can I communicate with the Company’s Directors?

The Board is committed to continuing to engage with stockholders and encourages an open dialogue about compensation, governance and other matters. We value your input, your investment and your support. The Board has established a process to facilitate communication by stockholders with Directors.

Stockholders or others who wish to communicate any concern of any nature to the Board of Directors, any Committee of the Board, or any individual director or group of directors, may write to a director or directors in care of the Office of the Corporate Secretary, Jack in the Box Inc., 9330 Balboa Avenue,9357 Spectrum Center Blvd., San Diego, CA 92123, or telephone888-613-5225. Your letter should indicate whether or not you are a stockholder of the Company.

Comments or questions regarding our accounting, internal controls or auditing matters will be referred to members of our

Audit Committee. Comments or questions regarding the nomination of directors and other corporate governance matters will be referred to members of the Nominating and Governance Committee. For all other matters, our Corporate Secretary will, depending on the subject matter:

forward the communication to the director or directors to whom it is addressed;

forward the communication to the appropriate management personnel;

attempt to handle the inquiry directly, for example where it is a request for information about our Company, or it is a stock-relatedstock- related matter; or

not forward the communication if it is primarily commercial in nature or if it relates to an improper or irrelevant topic.

topics.

18.
How do I submit a proposal for action at the 20192023 Annual Meeting?

A proposal for action to be presented by any stockholder at the 20192023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be acted upon only:

If a proposal is to be included in the proxy statement, pursuant toRule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the proposal is received by the Corporate Secretary no later than 120 calendar days prior to the anniversary of this year’s mailing date, so no later than 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time, onSeptember 27, 2018.

October 3, 2022.

If the proposal is not to be included in the proxy statement, the proposal is delivered to the Corporate Secretary not less than 120 days and not more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the previous year’s Annual Meeting, or not later than October 30, 2018,November 4, 2022, and not earlier than September 30, 2018;October 5, 2022; in addition, such proposal is, under

Delaware General Corporation Law, an appropriate subject for stockholder action; and must also comply with the procedures and requirements set forth in as well as the applicable requirements of our Bylaws.

Delaware General Corporation Law, an appropriate subject for stockholder action; and must also comply with the procedures and requirements set forth in as well as the applicable requirements of our Bylaws.
In addition, the stockholder proponent, or a representative who is qualified under state law, must appear in person at the 20192023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to present such proposal.

All proposals must be in writing and should be sent to Jack in the Box Inc., to the attention of Phillip H. Rudolph, Corporate Secretary, at 9330 Balboa Avenue,9357 Spectrum Center Blvd., San Diego, CA 92123.

A copy of the Bylaws may be obtained by written request to the Corporate Secretary at the same address. The Bylaws are also available at http://investors.jackinthebox.com.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT13


16 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL ONE — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

PROPOSAL ONE — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

All of the directors of the Company are elected annually and serve until the next Annual Meeting and until their respective successors are elected and qualified. The current nominees for election as directors (each of whom is currently serving as a Director of the Company) are set forth below. All of the nominees have indicated their willingness to serve and have consented to be named in the Proxy Statement. If any should be unable or unwilling to stand for election, the shares represented by proxies may be voted for a substitute designated by the Board, unless a contrary instruction is indicated in the proxy.

Nominees for Director


The following table provides certain information about each nominee for director as of January 1, 2018.

Name    Age     Position(s) with the Company    

Director

Since

 

 

Leonard A. Comma

 

     48     Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer     2014 

 

David L. Goebel

 

     67     Independent Director     2008 

 

Sharon P. John

 

     53     Independent Director     2014 

 

Madeleine A. Kleiner

 

     66     Independent Director     2011 

 

Michael W. Murphy

 

     60     Independent Director     2002 

 

James M. Myers

 

     60     Independent Director     2010 

 

David M. Tehle

 

     61     Independent Director     2004 

 

John T. Wyatt

 

     62     Independent Director     2010 

 

Vivien M. Yeung

 

     45     Independent Director     2017 

2022.

Name
Age
Position(s) with the Company
Director
Since
David L. Goebel
71
Independent Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
2008
Darin S. Harris
53
Chief Executive Officer and Director
2020
Sharon P. John
57
Independent Director
2014
Madeleine A. Kleiner
70
Independent Director
2011
Michael W. Murphy
64
Independent Director
2002
James M. Myers
64
Independent Director
2010
David M. Tehle
65
Independent Director
2004
Vivien M. Yeung
49
Independent Director
2017
Vote Required for Approval

In the election of directors, you may vote FOR, AGAINST, or ABSTAIN. The Company’s Bylaws require that, in an election such as this, where the number of director nominees does not exceed the number of directors to be elected, each director will be elected by the vote of the majority of the votes cast (in person or by proxy) with respect to the director. A “majority of votes cast” means that the number of shares cast “FOR” a director’s election exceeds the number of votes cast “AGAINST” that director. For purposes of determining the votes cast, only those votes cast “FOR” or “AGAINST” are included. Neither a vote to ABSTAIN nor a brokernon-vote will count as a vote cast FOR or AGAINST a director nominee and, as a result, will have no direct effect on the outcome of the election of directors. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will be counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present.

In an uncontested election, a nominee who does not receive a majority of the votes cast will not be elected. An incumbent director who is not elected because he or she does not receive a majority of the votes cast will continue to serve but shall tender his or her resignation to the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee will take action to determine whether to accept or reject the director’s resignation, or whether other action is appropriate, and will make a recommendation to the Board. Within ninety (90) days following the date of the certification of the election results, the Board will act on the Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale for such decision.

ON PROPOSAL ONE, ELECTION OF DIRECTORS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ALL EIGHT NOMINEES.

14    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL ONE — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Director Qualifications and Biographical Information


Our Board includes individuals with expertise in executive leadership and management, accounting and finance, marketing and branding, and across restaurant, franchise, hospitality, retail, manufacturing, and healthcare industries. Our Directors have a diversity of backgrounds and experiences. We believe that, as a group, they work effectively together in overseeing our business, hold themselves to the highest standards of integrity, and are committed to representing the long-term best interests of our stockholders.

Biographical information for each of the Director nominees, including the key qualifications, experience, attributes, and skills that led our Board to the conclusion that each of the Director nominees should serve as a director, is set forth on the pages below. In addition to the business and professional experiences described below, our Director nominees also serve on the boards of various civic and charitable organizations.

Director Nominees

LOGO

Leonard A. Comma

Director Since January 2014

Mr. Comma was appointed a Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, effective January 1, 2014, and since that date has served as a member of the Executive Committee. From May 2012 until October 2014, Mr. Comma served as President, and from November 2010 to January 1, 2014, as Chief Operating Officer of Jack in the Box Inc. Mr. Comma joined the Company in 2001 as Director of Convenience Store & Fuel Operations for the Company’s proprietary chain of Quick Stuff convenience stores, which included more than 60 locations at the time it was sold in 2009. In 2004, he was promoted to Division Vice President of Quick Stuff Operations, and in 2006 he was promoted to Regional Vice President of Quick Stuff and the Company’s Southern California region, which included more than 150 Jack in the Box restaurants. In 2007, Mr. Comma was promoted to Vice President of Operations, Division II, and had oversight of nearly 1,200 company and franchised Jack in the Box restaurants in the Western U.S. Prior to joining Jack in the Box Inc., Mr. Comma worked for ExxonMobil Corporation since 1989, with his last position as a Regional Manager with responsibility for supporting more than 300 franchisees.

Qualifications:

Mr. Comma has more than 25 years of experience at two major public companies with extensive retail and franchise operations, including for the past four years as Chairman and CEO of Jack in the Box Inc. In his prior executive-level role as President and Chief Operating Officer for Jack in the Box Inc., Mr. Comma was responsible for the operations of all Company and franchised Jack in the Box restaurants — more than 2,200 locations — as well as: Menu Innovation, including Menu Strategy, Operations Support, and Research & Development; Marketing Communications, including Merchandising; Consumer Intelligence & Analytics; and Internal Brand Communications. Mr. Comma also gained extensive experience in restaurant and retail operations and franchising in his previous roles with the Company as well as with ExxonMobil. His professional expertise and knowledge of our business, our competition and our competitive positioning, along with his deep understanding of our values and culture, bring an important Company perspective to the Board.


David L. Goebel
Qualifications:

 Mr. Goebel has more than 40 years of experience in the retail, food service, and hospitality industries. Mr. Goebel’s qualifications to serve on our Board include: his business, operational, management, and leadership development experience in the retail, food service, and hospitality industries; his work as an executive consultant; his relevant industry experience, including his experience in restaurant operations, restaurant and concept development, supply chain management, franchising, executive development, risk assessment, risk management, succession planning, executive compensation and strategic planning; and his service on other private
and public boards.
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board;
Director Since December 2008
Mr. Goebel has been a director of the Company since December 2008 and has served as Non-Executive Chairman of the Board since June 2020. He is a partner and Faculty Member for The ExCo Group LLC (formerly Merryck & Co.
Americas), a worldwide firm that provides peer to peer mentoring services for CEOs and senior business executives. He has held that position since May 2008. In 2008, Mr. Goebel became the founding principal and President of Santoku, Inc., a private company that operates a fast-casual healthy concept under the name Cultivare Greens & Grains and a fast- casual pizza concept under the name Pie Five Pizza Company. Mr. Goebel also served as acting President and CEO of Mr. Goodcents Franchise Systems, Inc. from 2010 until December 2014. From 2001 until 2007, he served in various executive positions at Applebee’s International, Inc., including as President and Chief Executive Officer in 2006-2007, during which time the company operated nearly 2,000 restaurants in the United States and internationally. Previous to that, Mr. Goebel was President of Summit Management, Inc., a consulting group specializing in executive development and strategic planning. Prior to that, he was the Chief Operating Officer of Finest Foodservice, LLC, a Boston Chicken/Boston Market franchise that he founded and co- owned, which was responsible for developing 80 restaurants within a seven-state area from 1994 until 1998. Since 2017, Mr. Goebel has served on the board of directors of Wingstop Inc. which operates and franchises more than 1,500 fast-casual restaurant locations across the United States and internationally. He currently serves as the Chair of their Compensation Committee and a member of their Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Since October 2021, Mr. Goebel has also served on the board of directors of Murphy USA Inc., a leading marketer of retail motor fuel products and convenience merchandise, where he serves as a member of the Audit Committee and Executive Compensation Committee.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT15


18 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL ONE — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

LOGO

David L. Goebel

Lead Director;

Director Since December 2008

Mr. Goebel has been a director of the Company since December 2008, and currently serves as Lead Director. He is a partner and Faculty Member for Merryck & Co. Ltd., a worldwide firm that provides peer to peer mentoring services for CEOs and senior business executives. He has held that position since May 2008. In 2008, Mr. Goebel became the founding principal and President of Santoku, Inc., a private company that operates sandwich shops under the name Goodcents® Deli Fresh Subs (“Goodcents”), catering and cafeteria operations under the name Y-Leave Cafe, catering services under the name Prime Catered Events, and a fast-casual pizza concept under the name Pie Five® Pizza Company. Mr. Goebel also served as acting President and CEO of Mr. Goodcents Franchise Systems, Inc., the franchisor of Goodcents, from 2010 until December 2014. From 2001 until 2007, he served in various executive positions at Applebee’s International, Inc., including as President and Chief Executive Officer in 2006-2007, during which time the company operated nearly 2,000 restaurants in the United States and internationally. Previous to that, Mr. Goebel was President of Summit Management, Inc., a consulting group specializing in executive development and strategic planning. Prior to that, he was the Chief Operating Officer of Finest Foodservice, LLC, a Boston Chicken/Boston Market franchise that he founded andco-owned, which was responsible for developing 80 restaurants within a seven-state area from 1994 until 1998. In November 2017, Mr. Goebel joined the board of directors of Wingstop Inc. which operates and franchises more than 1,000 fast-casual restaurant locations across the United States and internationally.

Qualifications:

Mr. Goebel has more than 40 years of experience in the retail, food service, and hospitality industries. Mr. Goebel’s qualifications to serve on our Board include: his business, operational, management, and leadership development experience in the retail, food service, and hospitality industries; his work as an executive consultant; his relevant industry experience, including his experience in restaurant operations, restaurant and concept development, supply chain management, franchising, executive development, risk assessment, risk management, succession planning, executive compensation and strategic planning; and his service on other private and public boards.

LOGO

Sharon P. John

Director Since September 2014

Ms. John has been a director of the Company since September 2014. Ms. John has been the Chief Executive Officer, President and a member of the Board of Directors ofBuild-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. since June 2013. From January 2010 through May 2013, Ms. John served as President of Stride Rite Children’s Group LLC, a division of Wolverine Worldwide, Inc., a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of footwear and apparel. From 2002 through 2009, she held positions of broadened portfolio and increased responsibility at Hasbro, Inc., a multinational toy and board game company, including as General Manager & Senior Vice President of its U.S. Toy Division from 2006 to 2008 and General Manager & Senior Vice President of its Global Preschool unit from June 2008 through 2009. Ms. John also founded and served as Chief Executive Officer of Checkerboard Toys; served as Vice President, U.S. Toy Division with VTech Industries, Inc.; and served in a range of roles at Mattel, Inc. She started her career in advertising.

Qualifications:

Ms. John’s qualifications to serve on our Board include her current role as CEO and director of a publicly traded global retail company and her broad merchandising, marketing, branding, sales and executive management experience, including key roles at well-known consumer brands.

16    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT



Darin S. Harris
Qualifications:

 Mr. Harris has more than 25 years of leadership experience in the restaurant industry encompassing operations, franchising, brand strategy, and restaurant development. His professional expertise and knowledge of our business, our industry, and our competitive position bring an important Company
perspective to the Board.
Chief Executive Officer;
Director Since June 2020
Darin Harris began his role as Chief Executive Officer and joined the Board of Directors in June 2020. He was previously CEO of North America for flexible working company, IWG PLC, Regus,
North America, from April 2018 to May 2020. Prior to that, from August 2013 to January 2018, Mr. Harris served as Chief Executive Officer of CiCi’s Enterprises LP. Mr. Harris also previously served as Chief Operating Officer for Primrose Schools from October 2008 to July 2013. He previously held franchise leadership roles as Senior Vice President at Arby’s Restaurant Group, Inc, from June 2005 to October 2008 and Vice President, Franchise and Corporate Development at Captain D’s Seafood, Inc., from May 2000 to January 2004. He was also a prior franchise operator of multiple Papa John’s Pizza and Qdoba Mexican Grill restaurants from November 2002 to June 2005. Since October 2021, Mr. Harris has also served on the board of directors of Shipley Do-nut Flour & Supply Co.

Sharon P. John
Qualifications:

Ms. John’s qualifications to serve on our Board include her current role as CEO and director of a publicly traded global retail company and her broad merchandising, marketing, branding, sales and executive management experience, including key
roles at well-known consumer brands.
Director Since September 2014
Ms. John has been a director of the Company since September 2014. Ms. John has been the Chief Executive Officer, President and a member of the Board of Directors of Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. since June 2013. From
January 2010 through May 2013, Ms. John served as President of Stride Rite Children’s Group LLC, a division of Wolverine Worldwide, Inc., a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of footwear and apparel. From 2002 through 2009, she held positions of broadened portfolio and increased responsibility at Hasbro, Inc., a multinational toy and board game company, including as General Manager & Senior Vice President of its U.S. Toy Division from 2006 to 2008 and General Manager & Senior Vice President of its Global Preschool unit from June 2008 through 2009. Ms. John also served in a range of roles at Mattel, Inc. She started her career in the advertising industry.
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 19

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL ONE — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Madeleine A. Kleiner
Qualifications:

 Ms. Kleiner’s qualifications to serve on our Board include her experience as general counsel for two public companies, as outside counsel to numerous public companies and her past and current experience on public company boards. She brings to our Board experience as an executive for a major franchisor in the hospitality industry, as well as expertise in corporate governance, risk management, securities laws disclosure, securities transactions, mergers and acquisitions, Sarbanes- Oxley compliance, human resources and executive compensation, government relations and crisis
management.
Director Since September 2011
Ms. Kleiner has been a director of the Company since September 2011 and is currently Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee. From 2001 to 2008, Ms. Kleiner was Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary for Hilton Hotels Corporation, a hotel and resort company. At Hilton, Ms. Kleiner oversaw the company’s legal affairs and the ethics, privacy and government affairs functions. She was also a member of the executive committee with significant responsibility for board of directors’ matters. From 1999 through 2001, Ms. Kleiner served as a director of a number of Merrill Lynch mutual funds operating under the Hotchkiss and Wiley name. From 1995 to 1998, Ms. Kleiner served as Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel of H. F. Ahmanson & Company and its subsidiary, Home Savings of America, where she was responsible for oversight of legal, human resources, legislative and government affairs and corporate communications. Previous to that, from 1977 to 1995, Ms. Kleiner was with the law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, including as partner from 1983 to 1995, where she advised corporations and their boards primarily in the areas of mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance, securities transactions and compliance. Ms. Kleiner has served on the board of directors of Northrop Grumman Corporation since 2008, where she is a member of the Compensation Committee. Ms. Kleiner also serves on the board of directors of the Ladies Professional Golf Association (“LPGA”) and the Reserve Club.

Michael W. Murphy
Qualifications:

 Mr. Murphy’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his business and management experience leading Sharp HealthCare, an integrated healthcare delivery system with multiple facilities and more than 18,000 employees, his experience as a senior financial officer of Sharp HealthCare, and his experience as a Certified Public Accountant, and former partner at Deloitte. The Board benefits from Mr. Murphy’s extensive experience in accounting, finance, financial reporting, auditing, governance, labor relations, human resources and compensation, marketing, risk assessment and risk management,
strategic planning and quality initiatives.
Director Since September 2002
Mr. Murphy has been a director of the Company since September 2002 and is currently Chair of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Murphy served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Sharp HealthCare from April 1996 until his
retirement in February 2019, and as member of the Sharp Board from 2007 through his retirement. Sharp is a comprehensive healthcare delivery system which has been recognized with the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, the nation’s highest Presidential honor for quality and organizational performance excellence. Prior to his appointment to President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Murphy served as Senior Vice President of Business Development and Legal Affairs for Sharp HealthCare. He began his career at Sharp in 1991 as Chief Financial Officer of Grossmont Hospital before moving to a system-wide role as Vice President of Financial Accounting and Reporting. Prior to this, Mr. Murphy provided certified public accounting services, including as a partner at Deloitte.

LOGO

Madeleine A. Kleiner

Director Since September 2011

Ms. Kleiner has been a director of the Company since September 2011 and is currently Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee. From 2001 to 2008, Ms. Kleiner was Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for Hilton Hotels Corporation, a hotel and resort company. At Hilton, Ms. Kleiner oversaw the company’s legal affairs and the ethics, privacy and government affairs functions. She was also a member of the executive committee with significant responsibility for board of directors matters. From 1999 through 2001, Ms. Kleiner served as a director of a number of Merrill Lynch mutual funds operating under the Hotchkiss and Wiley name. From 1995 to 1998, Ms. Kleiner served as Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel of H. F. Ahmanson & Company and its subsidiary, Home Savings of America, where she was responsible for oversight of legal, human resources, legislative and government affairs and corporate communications. Previous to that, from 1977 to 1995, Ms. Kleiner was with the law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, including as partner from 1983 to 1995, where she advised corporations and their boards primarily in the areas of mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance, securities transactions and compliance. Ms. Kleiner has served on the board of directors of Northrop Grumman Corporation since 2008, where she is a member of the audit committee.

Qualifications:

Ms. Kleiner’s qualifications to serve on our Board include her experience as general counsel for two public companies, as outside counsel to numerous public companies and her past and current experience on public company boards. She brings to our Board experience as an executive for a major franchisor in the hospitality industry, as well as expertise in corporate governance, risk management, securities laws disclosure, securities transactions, mergers and acquisitions, Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, human resources and executive compensation, government relations and crisis management.

LOGO

Michael W. Murphy

Director Since September 2002

Mr. Murphy has been a director of the Company since September 2002, and is currently Chair of the Audit Committee. Since April 1996, Mr. Murphy has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Sharp HealthCare, a comprehensive healthcare delivery system in San Diego which has been recognized with the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, the nation’s highest Presidential honor for quality and organizational performance excellence. Prior to his appointment to President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Murphy served as Senior Vice President of Business Development and Legal Affairs for Sharp HealthCare. He began his career at Sharp in 1991 as Chief Financial Officer of Grossmont Hospital before moving to a system-wide role as Vice President of Financial Accounting and Reporting. Prior to this, Mr. Murphy provided certified public accounting services, including as a partner at Deloitte.

Qualifications:

Mr. Murphy’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his business and management experience leading Sharp HealthCare, an integrated healthcare delivery system with multiple facilities and more than 18,000 employees, his experience as a senior financial officer of Sharp HealthCare, and his experience as a Certified Public Accountant, and former partner at Deloitte. He also serves on the Board of Directors and executive committee of the California Chamber of Commerce. The Board benefits from Mr. Murphy’s extensive experience in accounting, finance, financial reporting, auditing, governance, labor relations, human resources and compensation, marketing, risk assessment and risk management, strategic planning and quality initiatives.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT17


20 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL ONE — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

LOGO

James M. Myers

Director Since December 2010

Mr. Myers has been a director of the Company since December 2010. Mr. Myers has served as Chairman of the Board of Petco, the national pet supplies retailer since July 2015, and was also Petco’s Chief Executive Officer from 2004 until February 1, 2017. Previously, Mr. Myers held the following positions at Petco: President from 2011 until 2015; Chief Financial Officer from 1998 to 2004; and Vice President and Controller from 1990. Prior to that, Mr. Myers was a Certified Public Accountant with KPMG LLP. Mr. Myers serves on the board of the Retail Industry Leaders Association, and previously served on the board of Provide Commerce, ane-commerce retailer and public company, from 2004 to 2006, when Provide Commerce was acquired. Mr. Myers served on the audit committee at Provide Commerce.

Qualifications:

Mr. Myers’ qualifications to serve on our Board include more than 35 years of financial and retail operations experience, including 10 years as a CPA and public company auditor with KPMG LLP and 25 years with Petco, a national specialty retail chain with more than 1,500 stores in all 50 states, Puerto Rico and Mexico. Mr. Myers brings to the Board his experience with marketing and consumer brands, human resources and compensation, mergers and acquisitions, capital markets, financial reporting, financial oversight, and the financial and strategic issues facing public and private companies, as well as prior experience of serving on a public company board and audit committee.


James M. Myers
Qualifications:

 Mr. Myers’ qualifications to serve on our Board include more than 35 years of financial and retail operations experience, including 10 years as a CPA and public company auditor with KPMG LLP and 25 years with Petco, a national specialty retail chain with more than 1,500 stores in all 50 states, Puerto Rico and Mexico. Mr. Myers brings to the Board his experience with marketing and consumer brands, human resources and compensation, mergers and acquisitions, capital markets, financial reporting, financial oversight, and the financial and strategic issues facing public and private companies, as well as prior experience of serving on a public company
board and audit committee.
Director Since December 2010
Mr. Myers has been a director of the Company since December 2010 and is currently Chair of the Finance Committee. Mr. Myers served as Chairman of the Board of Petco, the national pet supplies retailer from July 2015 until September
2018 and was also Petco’s Chief Executive Officer from 2004 until February 2017. Previously, Mr. Myers held the following positions at Petco: President from 2011 until 2015; Chief Financial Officer from 1998 to 2004; and Vice President and Controller from 1990. Prior to that, Mr. Myers was a Certified Public Accountant with KPMG LLP.

LOGO

David M. Tehle

Director Since December 2004

Mr. Tehle has been a director of the Company since December 2004, and is currently Chair of the Finance Committee. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dollar General Corporation, a publicly traded company, from June 2004 until his retirement in June 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Tehle served from 1997 to 2004 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Haggar Corporation, a manufacturing, marketing, and retail corporation. From 1996 to 1997, he was Vice President of Finance for a division of The Stanley Works, one of the world’s largest manufacturer of tools, and from 1993 to 1996, he was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hat Brands, Inc. Since February 2016, Mr. Tehle has served on the board of directors of Genesco Inc., a specialty retailer, selling footwear, headwear, sports apparel and accessories, where he serves on the audit committee. Since July 2016, he has served on the board of US Foods Holding Corp., where he chairs the audit committee. In July 2017, Mr. Tehle joined the Board of National Vision, Inc. where he chairs the audit committee.

Qualifications:

Mr. Tehle’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his lengthy experience in senior financial management at public companies in the retail and manufacturing industries, and his service on three other boards of public companies in the retail and food service sectors. As an active CFO through June 2015, he was responsible for the overall financial management of a large retail organization. Mr. Tehle has experience in the oversight of strategic planning, human resources and compensation, finance, accounting, information systems, investor relations, treasury and internal audit functions. He brings valuable financial expertise and retail and management experience to the Board.


David M. Tehle
Qualifications:

 Mr. Tehle’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his lengthy experience in senior financial management at public companies in the retail and manufacturing industries, and his service on other boards of public companies in the retail and food service sectors. As an active CFO through June 2015, he was responsible for the overall financial management of a large retail organization. Mr. Tehle has experience in the oversight of strategic planning, human resources and compensation, finance, accounting, information systems, investor relations, treasury and internal audit functions. He brings valuable financial expertise and retail and
management experience to the Board.
Director Since December 2004
Mr. Tehle has been a director of the Company since December 2004 and is currently Chair of the Audit Committee. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dollar General Corporation, a publicly traded
company, from 2004 until his retirement in 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Tehle served from 1997 to 2004 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Haggar Corporation, a manufacturing, marketing, and retail corporation. From 1996 to 1997, he was Vice President of Finance for a division of The Stanley Works, one of the world’s largest manufacturer of tools, and from 1993 to 1996, he was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hat Brands, Inc. Mr. Tehle served on the board of directors of Genesco, Inc. from February 2016 through June 2019. Since July 2016, he has served on the board of US Foods Holding Corp., where he chairs the Audit Committee; and since July 2017, on the Board of National Vision, Inc. where he also chairs the Audit Committee.

18    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 21

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL ONE — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Vivien M. Yeung
Qualifications:

 Ms. Yeung’s qualifications to serve on our Board include her current strategic consulting work and recent strategic roles at publicly traded global retail companies, as well as her broad background in strategy development across channel development, marketing, product management, international growth, pricing and new business development, including at Kohl’s, Lululemon, Starbucks, and as a
consultant at Bain.
Director Since April 2017
Ms. Yeung has been a director of the Company since April 2017. Ms. Yeung is currently serving as the Executive Vice President & Chief Strategy Officer of Kohl’s Corporation. From January 2018 until November 29, 2019, Ms.
Yeung served as General Manager, Venture at Lululemon Athletica Inc, a healthy lifestyle inspired athletic apparel company. She previously served as that company’s Chief Strategy Officer from May 2015 to January 2018, and as Vice President, Strategy from November 2011 to May 2015. From 2008 until 2011, Ms. Yeung was an independent consultant working with philanthropies, non-profit organizations and small to medium-sized enterprises on strategy development. From 2002 to 2008, she held positions with increasing responsibilities at Starbucks Coffee Company, a global premium food and beverage retailer, leading strategy development and process improvement for its North America, International, and Global Product organizations. Ms. Yeung started her career with Bain & Company, a global strategy consulting firm, advising clients on growth, operational and investment strategies across Greater China, Southeast Asia and Australia.

LOGO

John T. Wyatt

Director Since May 2010

Mr. Wyatt has been a director of the Company since May 2010, and is currently Chair of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Wyatt has served as the Chief Executive Officer of KinderCare Education, an early childhood education company, since February 2012. From 2008 through February 2012, Mr. Wyatt was president of the Old Navy division of Gap Inc. He joined Gap Inc. in 2006, and previously served as President of the company’s GapBody division, and President of the company’s Outlet division. From 2004 to 2006, Mr. Wyatt was President and Chief Executive Officer at Cutter & Buck Inc., a designer and marketer of upscale apparel, including serving on the publicly held company’s board of directors. From 2002 to 2004, he served as President of Warnaco Intimate Apparel, a global designer and manufacturer, and from 1999 to 2002, he was Executive Vice President for Strategic Planning and eBusiness Strategies in the Saks family of companies. Additionally, Mr. Wyatt spent more than 20 years with VF Corporation, serving ultimately as President of Vanity Fair Intimates and Vanity Fair Intimates Coalition.

Qualifications:

Mr. Wyatt’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his experience in senior management for major consumer brands in large global retail companies, including strategy and business development, marketing and brand building, product development, supply chain, finance and capital markets, labor relations, human resources and compensation, organizational development and succession planning, and his prior public company board experience. He brings extensive experience in growing consumer brands to the Board.

LOGO

Vivien M. Yeung

Director Since April 2017

Ms. Yeung has been a director of the Company since April 2017. Ms. Yeung has served as General Manager, Venture at Lululemon Athletica Inc, a healthy lifestyle inspired athletic apparel company, since December 2017. She previously served as that company’s Chief Strategy Officer since May 2015, and as Vice President, Strategy from November 2011 to May 2015. From 2008 until 2011, Ms. Yeung was an independent consultant working with philanthropies,non-profit organizations and small to medium enterprises on strategy development. From 2002 to 2008, she held positions with increasing responsibilities at Starbucks Coffee Company, a global premium food and beverage retailer, leading strategy development and process improvement for its North America, International, and Global Product organizations. Ms. Yeung started her career with Bain & Company, a global strategy consulting firm, advising clients on growth, operational and investment strategies across Greater China, Southeast Asia and Australia.

Qualifications:

Ms. Yeung’s qualifications to serve on our Board include her current and recent strategic roles at a publicly traded global retail company, as well as her broad background in strategy development across channel development, marketing, product management, international growth, pricing and new business development, including at Starbucks and as a consultant at Bain.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT19


22 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We operate within a comprehensive corporate governance structure driving and expecting the highest standards of professional and personal conduct. Our Corporate Governance Principles and Practices, our ethics Code of Conduct: “The Integrity Playbook,” the charters for our Audit, Compensation, Finance, and Nominating and Governance Committees, and other corporate governance information, are available athttp://investors.jackinthebox.com. These materials are also available in print to any stockholder upon written request to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, Jack in the Box Inc., 9330 Balboa Avenue,9357 Spectrum Center Blvd., San Diego, CA 92123. The information on our website is not a part of this Proxy Statement and is not incorporated into any of our filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Directors’ Independence


The Jack in the Box Inc. Director Independence Guidelines provide that a director is not independent if he or she is: (a) a director, executive officer, partner or owner of 5% or greater interest in a company that either purchases from or makes sales to our Company that total more than one percent of the consolidated gross revenues of such company for that fiscal year; (b) a director, executive officer, partner or owner of 5% or greater interest in a company from which our Company borrows an amount equal to or greater than one percent of the consolidated assets of either our Company or such other company; or (c) a trustee, director or executive officer of a charitable organization that has received in that fiscal year discretionary donations from our Company that total more than
1% of the organization’s latest publicly available national annual charitable receipts.

The Board has analyzed the independence of each Director. It has determined that all but Mr. CommaHarris are independent directors under the NASDAQ Listing Rules, as well as the additional Director Independence Guidelines adopted by the Board. As part of its analysis, the Board determined that none of these Directors have a material relationship with the Company. Mr. CommaHarris is our current Chief Executive Officer and an employee, and therefore he is not considered “independent” as that term is defined by the relevant listing rules and governance guidelines.

Board Meetings, Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and Attendance


In fiscal 2017,2021, each director attended more than 75% of the meetings of the Board and of the committees on which he or she served. The Board held sevennine meetings in fiscal 2017.

2021.

All of the

While we do not have a formal attendance policy regarding attendance by our directors at our annual stockholder meetings, all directors standing for election in 20182022 and who were Company directors at the time attended the 20172021 Annual Meeting, and we currently expect all of our directors standing for election to be present at the 2018 Annual Meeting.

Determination of Current Board Leadership Structure


In April 2020, the Board of Directors, with input from the Nominating and Governance Committee, appointed independent director David Goebel as Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, effective in June 2020 once Darin Harris started his employment as Chief Executive Officer with the Company. Previously, Mr. Goebel has been on the Board of Directors since December 2008 and previously served as the Lead Independent Director. The Nominating and Governance Committee’s Charter provides that the Committee will annually assess the leadership structure of the Board and recommend a structure to the Board for approval.
In November 2017,2021, the Board of Directors, with input from the Nominating and Governance Committee, conducted this annual assessment, including assessing whether (i) the roles of Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chairman of the Board should continue to be combined, and (ii) the Board should continue to have an independent Lead Director. split between two different individuals.
Based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board believes that continuingthe leadership structure with a combined Chairman/CEO is in the best interestsan independent Chairman of the CompanyBoard is still appropriate at this time and its stockholders.

will promote continued effective decision-making.

The Board determined that having one individual serve in both roles provides for clear leadership, accountability, and alignment on corporate strategy. The Board believes that combining the roles ofseparating these two positions enables our Chairman and CEO puts Mr. Comma in the best position to use hisin-depth knowledge of our industry, our business and its challenges, and our stakeholders, including our stockholders, employees, franchisees and guests, to providelead the Board withof Directors in its oversight and advisory roles and allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on supervising the informationCompany’s day-to-day business operations and leadership needed to set agendasdeveloping and direction forimplementing the Company. The Board does not believe that having an independent Chairman would makeCompany’s business strategies and objectives. Because of the Board’s risk oversight processes more effective. The Board noted that, during Mr. Comma’s tenure as Chairman and CEO, and Mr. Goebel’s service as Lead Director,many responsibilities of the Board has received timelyof Directors and relevant information regarding the Company’s business.

20    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

In reaching its conclusion, the Board also considered the longstanding policiessignificant time and practices at Jack in the Box Inc. for strong, independent oversight, including:

a Board with a high degree of independence, including only onenon-independent member;

Board Committees (other than the Executive Committee) that are composed entirely of independent directors;

Board Committee Chairs who review and approve agendas before Committee meetings;

an annual evaluation of the performanceeffort required by each of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer by the Compensation Committee, which evaluation is then discussed with the independent directors ofto perform their respective duties, the Board believes that at this time having separate persons in executive session;

these roles enhances the ability of each to
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 23

regular executive sessions held byTABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
discharge those duties effectively and, as a result, enhances the BoardCompany’s prospects for success. As Chairman, Mr. Goebel will continue to call and key Board Committees, attended only by independent directors;

the abilitypreside at meetings of the independent directors to call meetingsas well as the Board, and he will, in consultation with the CEO and other directors, establish the agenda for each Board of Director’s meeting. The Chairman

also serves as the spokesman for the Board of Directors should any public communications from the Board be appropriate. As noted earlier, the Board assesses its leadership structure on a regular basis and would revisit the current structure should it deem a change in that structure appropriate.
Lead Director
At all times when the Chair of the Board and recommend agenda topics to be considered byis not the Board; and

Chief Executive Officer or otherwise an independent director, the Board shall appoint a strong, independent Lead Independent Director who has oversight responsibility for executive sessions and information flow to the Board.

Based on these factors, the Board has concluded that retaining the current Board leadership structure provides valuable stability and effective leadership.

Lead Director

The independent directors have appointed Mr. Goebel to serve as Lead Director.shall be an “independent” director. Our Corporate Governance Principles and Practices provide for the Lead Director to fulfill the following functions:

set agendas for the executive sessions of the Board;

serve on the Executive Committee;

preside at the executive sessions of the independent directors held following each scheduled board meeting;

act as a key communication channel between the Board and the CEO;

lead the Board in determining the format and adequacy of information the directors receive;

provide the Chairman with input on agendas for Board meetings and the schedule of meetings in order to assure sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items;

call meetings of independent directors; and

if requested by major stockholders, ensure that he or she is available for consultation and direct communication.

The Lead Director may perform other functions as the Board may direct.

Principally because our current Chairman is an independent director, the Board has elected not to fill the role of Lead Independent Director at this time.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight


Management is responsible for the Company’sday-to-day risk management. The Board’s role is to provide oversight of the processes designed to identify, assess and monitor key risks and risk mitigation activities. The Board fulfills its risk oversight responsibilities through (i) quarterly reports from the Vice PresidentHead of Internal Audit (VP, Internal Audit)(Internal Audit Head) to the Audit Committee relating to risk management and oversight; (ii) annualongoing enterprise risk management discussions by the full Board with the VP,Director of Internal Audit and Company leadership; (iii) receiving reports directly from managersemployees responsible for the management of particular business risks; and (iv) reports by each Committee Chair regarding the respective Committee’s oversight of specific risk topics.

The Board reviews cybersecurity risk with the Chief Information Officer regularly and has delegated oversight of

other specific

risk areas to Committees of the Board. For example, the Audit Committee discusses with Management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps Management has taken to monitor and mitigate those risks. As another example, the Compensation Committee discusses with its independent consultant, Management and the Compensation Risk Committee the risks arising in connection with the design of the Company’s compensation programs and succession planning. The risk oversight responsibility of each Board Committee is described in its committee charter available athttp://investors.jackinthebox.cominvestors.jackinthebox.com..

A more detailed discussion of the Compensation Committee’s oversight of compensation risk is found in the Section “Compensation Risk Analysis” contained later in this proxy.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT21


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

The Board’s Role in Succession Planning


The Board expects Management to have an ongoing program for effective senior leadership development and succession. As reflected in our Corporate Governance Principles and Practices, the Board’s practice is to have the CEO review annually with the full Board the abilities of the key senior managers and their likely successors. The Board also considers management succession issues when meeting in
executive session at each Board meeting. Additionally, the

Board oversees ongoing plans for management development and retention, as well as executive succession, including CEO succession. At times, the Board will delegate to the Compensation Committee or, as it has recently done, to an Ad Hoc Succession Planning Committee of the Board, responsibility to review and advise on succession planning, in

24 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
which case the Board expects the Committee to review such plans with Management and the Board and to make recommendations to the Board with respect thereto.

Committees of the Board


The Board of Directors has fivefour standing committees: Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Governance, Finance, and Executive.Finance. The Board considers new committee and chair assignments and the designation of a Lead Director, effectiveNon-Executive Chairman of the Board each February. Effective February 2017,2021, the Board of Directors approved the Board Committee assignments for the year andre-designated David Goebel as the Lead Director. Ms. Yeung joinedNon-Executive Chairman of the Board in April and was appointed to Committees in May.Board. The current committee makeup is provided in the “Board Nominees” table in the Proxy Summary.

The authority and responsibility of each Committee is summarized below. A more detailed description of the functions of the Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Governance, and Finance Committees is included in each Committee charter available athttp://investors.jackinthebox.com.

Committee Member Independence. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Governance, and Finance Committees is an independent director for purposes of the NASDAQ Listing Rules as well as under the additional Director Independence Guidelines adopted by the Board. In addition, the members of the Audit Committee are all independent as required underRule 10A-3(b)(1)(ii) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the members of the Compensation Committee meet the definitions of (i) a“non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (ii) an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“IRC”), and (iii) the requirements ofRule 10C-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Executive Committee. The Executive Committee is authorized to exercise all powers of the Board in the management of the business and affairs of the Company while the Board is not in session. The Executive Committee did not meet in fiscal 2017.

Audit Committee.As more fully described in its charter, the Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors with overseeing:

the integrity of the Company’s financial reports;

the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

the independent registered public accountant’s performance, qualifications and independence;

the performance of the Company’s internal auditors; and

the Company’s processes for identifying, evaluating, and addressing major financial, legal, regulatory compliance, and enterprise risks.

The Audit Committee has sole authority to select, evaluate, and, when appropriate, replace the Company’s independent registered public accountants. The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as its independent registered public accountants for fiscal 20182022 and is asking the stockholders to ratify this appointment in Proposal 2. In the event the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection to determine, in its discretion, whether to retain KPMG or to select a different registered public accountant. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent auditing firm at any time during the year.

The Audit Committee meets at least each quarter with KPMG, Management and the Company’s VP, Internal Audit Head, to review the Company’s annual and interim consolidated financial results before the publication of quarterly earnings press releases and the filing of quarterly and annual reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee also meets at least each quarter in private sessions with KPMG, Management, and the VP, Internal Audit.Audit Head. The Audit Committee also oversees the Company’s Business Ethics Program, which includes receiving a quarterly report from the Ethics Officer. The Board of Directors has determined that each membera majority of members of the Audit Committee qualifiesqualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules.

The Audit Committee held sixfour meetings in fiscal 2017.2021. Additional information regarding the Audit Committee is set forth in the “Report of the Audit Committee” section of this proxy.

22    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


JACK IN THE BOX INC.  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE|  

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 25

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Compensation Committee.As more fully described in its charter, the Compensation Committee assists the Board in discharging the Board’s responsibilities relating to Directordirector and executive officer compensation, and it oversees the performance evaluation of Management. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the Company’s compensation philosophy and the compensation of executive officers, including short-short and long-term goals and metric and compensation components (e.g., cash, equity and other forms of compensation). The Compensation Committee discusses with Management and reports to the Board any significant risks associated with the design and administration of the Company’s compensation programs and succession planning, and actions taken by Management to mitigate such risks. The Committee has approved the disclosures in the Company’s “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement. The Compensation Committee held sixseven meetings in fiscal 2017.

2021.

Finance Committee.As more fully described in its charter, the Finance Committee assists the Board in advising and consulting with Management concerning financial matters of importance to the Company. Topics considered by the Committee include the Company’s capital structure, financing arrangements, stock repurchase programs, capital investment policies, investment performance oversight for the Company’s retirement plans, the budget process, and the financial implications of major acquisitions and divestitures. The Finance Committee discusses with Management and reports to the Board major risk exposures and the monitoring and mitigation activities undertaken by Management in connection with the matters overseen by the Committee, including proposed major transactions, capital structure, investment portfolio including employee benefit plan investments, financing arrangements, and share repurchase programs. The Finance Committee held five meetings in fiscal 2017.

2021.

Nominating and Governance Committee.As more fully described in its charter, the Nominating and Governance Committee duties include assessing the makeup and diversity of the Board, identifying and recommending qualified candidates to be nominated for election as directors at the Annual Meeting or to be appointed by the Board to fill an existing or newly created vacancy on the Board; recommending members of the Board to serve on each Board committee; and annually reviewing and recommending the leadership structure of the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee discusses with Management and reports to the Board major risk exposures in connection with matters overseen by the Committee. Its activities include:

evaluating director candidates for nomination;

evaluating the appropriate Board size;

reviewing and recommending corporate governance guidelines to the Board;

providing oversight with respect to the annual evaluation of Board, Committee and individual director performance;

���

overseeing the Company’s political and charitable contributions;

overseeing the Company’s political and charitable contributions;

assisting the Board in its oversight of the Company’s insider trading compliance program; and

recommending director education.

education; and

overseeing the Company’s ESG and sustainability strategy, initiatives, and policies.
All nominees for election as directors currently serve on the Board of Directors and are known to the Nominating and Governance Committee in that capacity. The Nominating and Governance Committee held fivefour meetings in fiscal 2017.

2021.

Committee Member Independence
The Board has determined that each member of the Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Governance, and Finance Committees is an independent director for purposes of the NASDAQ Listing Rules as well as under the additional Director Independence Guidelines adopted by the Board. In addition, the members of the Audit Committee are all independent as required under Rule 10A-3(b)(1)(ii) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and the members of the Compensation Committee meet the definitions of (i) a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (ii) an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“IRC”), and (iii) the requirements of Rule 10C-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Executive Sessions


Our independent,non-employee Directors meet in executive session without Management present at each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board. Mr. Goebel is currently designated by the Board to act as the Lead Director forleads such executive sessions.

sessions in his role as Non-Executive Chairman. The

The

Audit Committee also holds executive sessions at each regularly scheduled meeting, and the other Committees of the Board meet in executive session as they deem appropriate.
26 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Composition and Refreshment


Policy Regarding Consideration of Director Candidates and Makeup and Diversity of the Board.The Nominating and Governance Committee has the responsibility to identify, screen, and recommend qualified candidates to the Board for nomination as directors. In evaluating director candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the qualifications listed in the Jack in the Box Inc. Corporate Governance Principles and Practices, which are available athttp://investors.jackinthebox.cominvestors.jackinthebox.com..

The following are some of the factors generally considered by the Nominating and Governance Committee in evaluating director candidates:

the appropriate size of the Board;

the perceived needs of the Company for particular skills, background, and business experience;

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT23


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

the skills, background, reputation and experience of the nominees, including whether those qualities add to a diversity of experiences, backgrounds, individuals, viewpoints and perspectives on the Board;

leadership, character and integrity;

independence from Management and from potential conflicts of interest with the Company;

experience with accounting rules and practices;

experience with executive compensation;

applicable regulatory and listing requirements, including independence requirements and legal considerations;

interpersonal and communications skills and the benefits of a constructive working relationship among directors; and

the desire to balance the considerable benefits of continuity with the periodic injection of the fresh perspective provided by new members.

The Nominating and Governance Committee may also consider such other factors as it may deem are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Retirement Policy. Policy. The Board has adopted a retirement policy under which directors may not stand for election or be appointed after age 73.75. The Board does not believe it should establish term limits which could disadvantage the Company by forcing out directors whose tenure and experience continue to add value to the workings of the Board.

Board Tenure Review Policy. Policy. The Company has a tenure review policy pursuant to which any director who has served more than 12 years on the Board shall submit to the Committee his or her voluntary offer to resign from the Board. The Committee undertakes a thorough review of any such director’s continued effectiveness and appropriateness for service and recommends to the full Board that it either accept or reject the offer of resignation; in the latter event, the long-tenured director may continue to serve on the Board and mustre-submit his or her resignation offer every three years for subsequent review.

Stockholder Recommendations and Board Nominations


In order to be evaluated pursuant to the Nominating and Governance Committee’s established procedures, stockholder recommendations for candidates for the Board must be sent in writing to the following address at least 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the previous year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders:

Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of

Directors c/o Office of the Corporate Secretary


Jack in the Box Inc.

9330 Balboa Avenue


9357 Spectrum Center Blvd.
San Diego, CA 92123

Any recommendation submitted by a stockholder to the Nominating and Governance Committee must include the same information concerning the potential candidate and the recommending stockholder as would be required under Article III, Section 3.16 of the Jack in the Box Inc. Bylaws if the stockholder wished to nominate the candidate directly.

The

Committee considers all candidates regardless of the source of the recommendation. In addition to stockholder recommendations, the Committee considers recommendations from current directors, Company personnel and others. The Company generally retains a search firm to assist it in identifying and screening candidates, and in conducting reference checks. The Committee applies the same standards in evaluating candidates submitted by stockholders as it does in evaluating candidates submitted by other sources.

A candidate nominated by a stockholder for election at an Annual Meeting of Stockholders will not be eligible for election unless the stockholder proposing the nominee has provided timely notice of the nomination in accordance with the deadlines (at least 120 days and no more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the previous year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders) and other requirements set forth in the Company’s Bylaws. Article III, Section 3.16 of the Company’s Bylaws provides that, in order to be eligible for election as a director, a candidate must deliver

JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 27

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
to the Corporate Secretary statements indicating whether the candidate:

is a party to any voting commitment that has not been disclosed to the Company;

is a party to any voting commitment that could limit the nominee’s ability to carry out a director’s fiduciary duties;

is a party to any arrangements for compensation, reimbursement, or indemnification in connection with

service as a director and has committed not to become a party to any such arrangement; and

will comply with the Company’s publicly disclosed policies and guidelines.

The foregoing is a summary of provisions of the Company’s Bylaws and is qualified by reference to the actual provisions of Article III, Section 3.16.

24    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Code of Conduct


Jack in the Box Inc. is committed to establishing and maintaining an effective ethics and compliance program that is intended to increase the likelihood of preventing, detecting, and correcting ethical lapses and violations of law or Company policy. In 1998, the Company adopted a Code of Conduct (the “Code”) which applies to all officers, and employees, as well as to our Board of Directors. The Company also provides our franchisees and significant vendors with our Code and with procedures for communicating any ethics or compliance concerns to the Company. The Code is revised from time to time, most recently in May 2017, when it wasre-named “The Integrity Playbook.”

July 2020 to update certain references to new personnel.

The Code is available on the Company’s website athttp://investors.jackinthebox.com.investors.jackinthebox.com. We will disclose amendments to, or waivers of our Code that are required to be disclosed under the securities rules, by posting such information on the Company’s website,www.jackintheboxinc.com. Any waiver of our Code for directors or executive officers must be approved by the Board of Directors. The Company did not grant any such waivers in fiscal 20172021 and does not anticipate granting any such waiver in fiscal 2018.

2022.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation


No member of our Compensation Committee is an officer, former officer, or employee of the Company. During fiscal 2017,2021, no member of the Compensation Committee had any relationship with the Company requiring disclosure under Item 404 ofRegulation S-K. During fiscal 2017,2021, no

interlocking

interlocking

relationship existed between any of our executive officers or Compensation Committee members, on the one hand, and the executive officers or Compensation Committee members of any other entity, on the other hand.

Additional Corporate Governance Principles and Practices


The Company has adopted Corporate Governance Principles and Practices which contain general principles and practices regarding the functioning of the Board of Directors and the Board Committees. The Nominating and Governance Committee regularly reviews the Principles and Practices and recommends revisions if and as appropriate. The full text of the Principles and Practices may be found athttp://investors.jackinthebox.com. The Principles and Practices address many of the items discussed above, and also include the following items:

Limitation on Other Board Service.Non-employee directors may not serve on the boards of more than three other public companies. Our corporate officersCorporate Officers are generally limited to serving on no more than one outside public company board, taking into consideration the time commitment and potential business conflicts inherent in such service.

Review of Director Skill Matrix.The Nominating and Governance Committee annually utilizes a skill matrix to assess the capabilities of the current directors and any needs for the Board as a whole. The matrix itself is updated if and as necessary to assure that it remains relevant to the evolving needs of the Company and the Board.

Board, Committee, and Individual Director Evaluations.Evaluations. The directors annually participate in a robust evaluation process focusing on an assessment of Board operations as a whole and the service of each director. Additionally, each of the Audit, Compensation, Finance, and Nominating and

Governance Committees conducts a separate evaluation of its own performance and the adequacy of its charter. The Nominating and Governance Committee coordinates the evaluation of individual directors and of the Board operations, and reviews and reports to the Board on the outcome of these

28 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
self-evaluations. As part of the evaluation process most years, the Lead DirectorNon-Executive Chairman of the Board will meet individually with each director to generate and discuss any ideas for improving the effectiveness of the director and/or the Board.

New Director Orientation and Continuing Education.The Board works with Management to schedulenew-director
orientation programs and continuing education programs for directors. Orientation is designed to familiarize new directors with the Company and the franchise restaurant industry as well as Company personnel, facilities, strategies and challenges, and corporate governance practices, including board ethics. Continuing education programs may includein-house and third-party presentations and programs.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT25


ESG Governance & Leadership
We believe the success of our past and of our future is built on the foundation of conducting our business with honesty, integrity and an uncompromised standard of ethics. Integrity is at the core of our interactions with each other and with our guests. This requires more than offering delicious, craveable food with friendly service. We strive to instill an environment of open communication and strong ethics throughout the organization and in all our business relationships.
ESG oversight is conducted from the highest levels of our organization. Our Nominating and Governance Committee oversees our ESG and sustainability strategy, initiatives, and policies, and it reviews management’s assessments of such strategy, initiatives, and policies. Additionally, the other committees of the Board are briefed on ESG matters relevant to their scope. For example, the Audit Committee is responsible for enterprise risk management and oversight over the Company’s ethics program in promoting an ethical culture,
while the Compensation Committee oversees topics such as gender pay equity and human capital management.
At the management level, ESG oversight is provided by our Chief Legal & Risk Officer and our ESG Steering Committee, who support our ongoing commitment to sustainability and the integration of ESG into our business operations. Our ESG Steering Committee is charged with setting the company’s ESG strategy; overseeing communication with employees, investors and other stakeholders with respect to ESG matters; and monitoring and anticipating developments related to and improving our understanding of ESG matters. The ESG Steering Committee is made up of subject-matter experts in relevant disciplines across our organization such as human resources, operations, supply chain, investor relations, and legal and government affairs. The Committee reports to the Board of Directors at least annually and to the Nominating and Governance Committee at least biannually.
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |��� 2022 PROXY STATEMENT 29

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES  

REQUIREMENTS

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

TheREQUIREMENTS

Under its charter, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Board the form and amount of compensation for ournon-employee directors. The following discussion of compensation and stock ownership guidelinesrequirements applies only to ournon-employee directors and does not apply to Mr. Comma. Mr. CommaHarris, who is an employee of the Company, compensated as an executive officer, and does not receive additional compensation for service as a director.

The Board believes that total compensation for directors should reflect the work required in both (i) their ongoing oversight and governance role and (ii) their continuous focus on driving long-term performance and stockholder value. The compensation program is designed to provide pay that is within a competitive withrange approximating the 50th percentile of pay of directors in the Company’s Peer Group. (The methodology used in determining the companies in the Fiscal 2021 Peer Group, and thethose companies, in the Fiscal 2017 Peer Group are described in Section III.b of the Compensation Discussion & Analysis (“CD&A”) in this Proxy Statement). The program consists of a combination of cash retainers and equity awards in the form of time-vested restricted stock units (“RSUs”). “Competitive” is defined as approximating the 50th percentile of pay of Peer Group directors.

Director Compensation Program Review and Changes


Director

The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the competitiveness of the director compensation is reviewed periodically by an independent compensation consultant.program, typically every two years. Any changes to director cash retainers and/or annual stock award values

generally occur only after such review. ThereThe last review occurred in July 2020 when the Committee’s independent compensation consultant Semler Brossy (prior to August 2021) provided competitive market data of directors in the Company’s fiscal 2021

Compensation Peer Group. The Committee recommended and the Board approved that a) the stock ownership requirement increase from three times to five times the annual cash Board service retainer (which was implemented in July 2020), and b) cash retainer payments be paid quarterly in arrears beginning after the 2021 Annual Stockholder meeting. No other changes were no changesmade to the director compensation for fiscal 2017.program.
30 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND STOCK OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS

Annual Compensation Program


a. Cash Retainers

Each director receives an annual cash retainer for his or her service on the Board, service on Board committees service asor chair of a Board committee, and service as Chairman or Lead Director, as applicable. There are no meeting fees. RetainersCash retainer payments are paid quarterly in a single installment on the first business day of the montharrears following the Annual Stockholder Meeting each year. Each new director receivesNew directors receive a prorated quarterly retainer that is paid on the first business day of the monthpayment in arrears, if applicable, following his or her appointment to the Board.

2017

2021 RETAINERS

Annual Board Service:

   

$65,000

 

Lead Director:

   

$17,500

 
Committee  Committee
Chair(1)
   Committee
Membership
 

 

Audit

 

  

 

$

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation

 

  

 

$

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

7,500

 

 

 

 

 

Finance

 

  

 

$

 

 

12,500

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

 

Nominating & Governance

 

  

 

$

 

 

12,500

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

Annual Board Service
$65,000
Chairman
$45,000
Lead Director(1)

$17,500
(1)
Only applies if an independent board member does not occupy the Chairman role.
Committee
Committee
Chair(1)
Committee
Membership
Audit
$25,000
$10,000
Compensation
$25,000
$7,500
Finance
$12,500
$5,000
Nominating & Governance
$12,500
$5,000
(1)
Includes Committee membership retainer

Directors may elect to defer receipt of some or all of their cash retainers in the form of Common Stock equivalents under the

Jack in the Box Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan forNon-Management Directors (the “Director Deferred“Deferred Compensation Plan”). The number of Common Stock equivalents credited to a director’s account is based on a per share price equal to the average of the closing price of Common Stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market for the 10 trading days immediately preceding the date the deferred compensation is credited to the director’s account. Under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan, to the extent dividends are paid, dividend equivalents and fractions thereof are converted to additional Common Stock equivalents and are credited to a director’s deferred compensation account as of the dividend payment dates. Each director’s account is settled in an equal number of shares of Common Stock upon the director’s termination of service from the Board. The Director Deferred Compensation Plan is anon-qualified plan under the IRC.

Internal Revenue Code.

b. Expenses

The Company reimburses directors for customary and usual travel andout-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings.

26    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


  DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES  

c. Annual Equity Grant — Restricted Stock Units

Each director receives an annual grant of RSUs under the Jack in the Box Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (“2004 Stock Incentive Plan”). We grant RSUs for the following reasons:

RSUs cause the value of directors’ share ownership to rise and fall with that of other stockholders, serving the objective of long-term alignment with stockholder interests.

RSUs are a prevalent form of director compensation among the Company’s Peer Group.

The Company determines the number of RSUs to be granted by dividing the annual equity award value of($135,000 for the Chairman, and $90,000 for board members) by the

closing

closing

price of Common Stock on the date of the annual grant, which is the dayshortly after the annual meeting of stockholders, provided the director is providing services to the Company on the date of grant. RSUs vest on the earlier of the first business day 12 months from the date of grant (unless deferred) or upon the director’s termination of service with the Board. Directors may elect to defer receipt of shares issuable under RSU awards to termination of their Board service; and beginning with the February 2015 RSU awards, shares that have vested and been deferred earn a dividend (in the form of Common Stock equivalents) to the same extent the Company pays a dividend on outstanding shares.
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 31

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND STOCK OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS

Director Ownership and Stock Holding Requirements


The Board believes that all directors should maintain a meaningful personal financial stake in the Company to align their long-term interests with those of our stockholders. Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Principles and Practices, the Board desires that, within a reasonable period after joining the Board, eachnon-employee director hold Common Stock with a value of at least threefive times the annual cash Board service retainer.retainer equal to $325,000. Direct holdings, unvested and deferred RSUs, and Common Stock equivalents count toward ownership value. In addition, each director is required to hold at least 50% of the shares resulting from RSU grants until termination of his or her Board service. The table below shows eachnon-employee director’s ownership value as of fiscal year-end 2017,2021, based on a closing stock price of $101.92$99.51 on the last trading day of fiscal 2017, September 29, 2017.2021, October 3, 2021. Each of our directors except Ms. Yeung who joined the board in April 2017, meets the stock holding requirement.

Name  Board Service
Effective Date
   

Direct Holdings/

Unvested RSUs

   Deferred
Units &
Common Stock
Equivalents
   

Total

Value

 

 

Mr. Goebel

 

  

 

 

 

 

Dec. 2008

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

1,665,067

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

482,082

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

2,147,149

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. John

 

  

 

 

 

 

Sept. 2014

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

345,509

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

345,509

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. Kleiner

 

  

 

 

 

 

Sept. 2011

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

765,725

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

578,090

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

1,343,815

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Murphy

 

  

 

 

 

 

Sept. 2002

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

165,722

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

6,063,934

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

6,229,656

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Myers

 

  

 

 

 

 

Dec. 2010

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

693,056

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

941,945

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

1,635,001

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Tehle

 

  

 

 

 

 

Dec. 2004

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

354,376

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

4,726,540

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

5,080,916

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Wyatt

 

  

 

 

 

 

May 2010

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

713,542

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

880,385

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

1,593,927

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. Yeung

 

  

 

 

 

 

April 2017

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT27


Name
Board Service
Effective Date
Direct Holdings/
Unvested RSUs
Deferred
Units &
Common Stock
Equivalents
Total Value
Mr. Goebel
Dec. 2008
$791,602
$1,436,725
$2,228,327
Ms. John
Sept.2014
$327,587
$449,188
$776,775
Ms. Kleiner
Sept.2011
$737,867
$1,020,674
$1,758,541
Mr. Murphy
Sept.2002
$85,479
$6,607,962
$6,693,441
Mr. Myers
Dec.2010
$666,916
$1,783,418
$2,450,334
Mr. Tehle
Dec.2004
$769,312
$4,863,054
$5,632,366
Ms. Yeung
April2017
$85,479
$683,136
$768,615
32 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES  

REQUIREMENTS

Fiscal 20172021 Compensation


The table below shows the compensation amounts for each of the Company’snon-employee directors. Each director directors who served in fiscal 2021. Mr. Goebel, Chairman of the Board, received an annual equity award of 9571,288 RSUs valued at $135,000 on the date of grant (March 1, 2021), and each of the other directors, except for Ms. Birch and Mr. Gainor who did not stand for re-election in February 2021, received an annual equity award of 859 RSUs, valued at $90,000 on the date of grant (March 1, 2017), except Ms. Yeung who joined the Board in April 2017.grant. The RSUs vest 100% on the earlier of the first business day 12 months from the date of grant or upon the director’s termination of service with the Board.

For fiscal 2017, the average annual compensation of directors was $177,857, comprised of (i) $87,857 in cash and (ii) $90,000 in RSUs. This average excludes dividend payments on deferred accounts and thepro-rated compensation paid to Ms. Yeung.

Name  Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash  (1)
   Stock
Awards (2)
   All Other
Compensation (3)
   Total 

 

Mr. Goebel

 

  

 

$

 

 

95,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

90,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

6,564

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

191,564

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. John

 

  

 

$

 

 

77,500

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

90,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

167,500

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. Kleiner

 

  

 

$

 

 

85,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

90,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

1,508

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

176,508

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Murphy

 

  

 

$

 

 

95,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

90,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

78,852

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

263,852

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Myers

 

  

 

$

 

 

80,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

90,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

11,315

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

181,315

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Tehle

 

  

 

$

 

 

87,500

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

90,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

53,412

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

230,912

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Wyatt

 

  

 

$

 

 

95,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

90,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

3,202

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

188,202

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. Yeung

 

  

 

$

 

 

70,769

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

70,769

 

 

 

 

Name
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash(2)
Stock
Awards(3)
All Other
Compensation(4)
Total
Ms. Birch(1)
$0
$0
$0
$0
Mr. Gainor(1)
$0
$0
$0
$0
Mr. Goebel
$61,250
$135,000
$22,942
$219,192
Ms. John
$38,750
$90,000
$7,011
$135,761
Ms. Kleiner
$43,750
$90,000
$8,710
$142,460
Mr. Murphy
$47,500
$90,000
$95,263
$232,763
Mr. Myers
$43,750
$90,000
$26,322
$160,072
Mr. Tehle
$47,500
$90,000
$60,822
$198,322
Ms. Yeung
$40,000
$90,000
$10,544
$140,544
(1)
(1)Ms. Birch and Mr. Gainor did not stand for re-election in February 2021 and did not receive any cash retainers or stock awards in fiscal 2021.
(2)

“Fees Earned or Paid in Cash” reflects Board and Committee retainers paid to each director in 20172021 either (a) in cash or (b) deferred at the director’s election.election (in the case of Ms. Yeung, who joined the Board in April 2017, received apro-rated retainer payment for board and committee service from April 2017 through the next annual stockholder meeting in February 2018.

Messrs. Goebel and Myers).
(3)
(2)

“Stock Awards” reflects the grant date fair value of RSUs granted under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, computed in accordance with ASC 718.

(4)
(3)

The amount reported in the “All Other Compensation” column reflects four dividend payments made during fiscal 20172021 that were credited to the applicable directors’ common stock equivalent accounts, in connection with (1) the respective director’s prior deferral of cash retainers, under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan described in the above section “a. Cash Retainers” and/or (2) beginning with the February 2015 RSU award, vested deferred RSUs as described in section c. “Annual Equity Grant – Restricted Stock Units.” Dividends are paid only to the same extent the Company pays a dividend on outstanding shares.

Outstanding Equity at Fiscal Year-End

The table below sets forth the aggregate number of unvested and deferred RSUs held by ournon-employee directors at the end of fiscal 2017.

Name  

Unvested

RSUs

   

Deferred

RSUs

 

 

Mr. Goebel

 

  

 

 

 

 

957

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,333

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. John

 

  

 

 

 

 

957

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. Kleiner

 

  

 

 

 

 

957

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

5,647

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Murphy

 

  

 

 

 

 

957

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

11,471

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Myers

 

  

 

 

 

 

957

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,957

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Tehle

 

  

 

 

 

 

957

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

14,640

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Wyatt

 

  

 

 

 

 

957

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

8,596

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. Yeung

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

28    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 33

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The following is the report of the Audit Committee with respect to Jack in the Box Inc.’s audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2017.

3, 2021.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the annual consolidated financial statements with Management and KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (the “independent auditor”). Management is responsible for the financial reporting process, the system of internal controls, including internal control over financial reporting, risk management and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent auditor is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, as well as expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the independent auditor. The Committee was also involved in selection of the firm’s lead engagement partner for fiscal 2017.
The Audit Committee met on sixfour occasions in the fiscal year ended October 1, 2017.3, 2021. The Audit Committee met with the independent auditor, with and without Management present, to discuss the results of its auditsaudit and quarterly reviews of the Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent auditor the matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Statement on Auditing Standards No. 161301 Communications with Audit Committees.The Audit Committee also received from the Company’s independent auditor the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable
requirements of the PCAOB regarding their communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent auditor its independence from the

Company. The Audit Committee also has considered whether the provision ofnon-audit services to the Company is compatible with the independence of the independent auditor.

In connection with the Company’s evaluation of potential alternatives with respect to the Qdoba brand, during 2017 the Audit Committee approved the scope and fees for the engagement of KPMG to perform audit services in connection with the Qdoba business on a separate,carved-out basis.

In performing its functions, the Audit Committee acts only in an oversight capacity and necessarily relies on the work and assurances of the Company’s Management and internal audit group as well as the Company’s independent auditor whose reports express opinions on the conformity of the Company’s annual financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, and the reports of KPMG, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors approved, the inclusion of the audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2017,3, 2021, for filing with the SEC.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Michael W. Murphy,

David M. Tehle, Chair


Madeleine Kleiner
James M. Myers

David M. Tehle


Vivien M. Yeung

This report is not deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this report by reference.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT29


34 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FEES AND SERVICES

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FEES AND SERVICES

The following table presents fees billed for professional services rendered by KPMG, the Company’s independent registered public accountants, for the fiscal years ended October 1, 20173, 2021, and October 2, 2016.

    2017   2016 

 

Audit Fees (1)

 

  

 

$

 

 

1,098,414

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

1,003,001

 

 

 

 

 

Qdoba Audit Fees(2)

 

  

 

 

 

 

880,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Fees (3)

 

  

 

 

 

 

612

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

8,750

 

 

 

 

 

All Other Fees

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

KPMG Total Fees

 

  

 

$

 

 

1,979,026

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

 

 

1,011,751

 

 

 

 

September 27, 2020.
 
2021
2020
Audit Fees(1)
$1,091,883
$1,421,196
Securitization Related Audit Fees(2)
$110,000
$110,000
Tax and other Fees
$
$
KPMG Total Fees
$1,201,883
$1,531,196
(1)

Audit Fees include fees for the audit of the Company’s consolidated annual financial statements and the audit of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. Audit Fees also include fees for review of the interim financial statements included in our Form10-Q quarterly reports and the issuance of consents and services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

(2)

QdobaSecuritization Related Audit Fees include fees for the audit of Jack in the Qdoba Restaurant Corporation’s (“QRC’s”)carved-outBox SPV Guarantor, LLC and Subsidiaries’ consolidated annual financial statements for fiscal years 2014, 2015 and 2016. Qdoba Audit Fees also include fees for review of the QRC’scarved-out interim financial statements and work performed by the independent registered public accounting firm through October 1, 2017 related to the audit of the QRC’scarved-out financial statements for fiscal year 2017.

(3)

Tax fees include fees for services rendered for sales tax audit defense, and additionally in fiscal 2016, tax advice in connection with amendment to the Company’s credit facility, and interest rate swaps.

statements.

Registered Public Accountants’ Independence. The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of the above-noted services, other than audit services, is compatible with maintaining KPMG’s independence, and has determined that the provision of such services has not adversely affected KPMG’s independence.

Policy on Audit CommitteePre-Approval of Services. The Company and its Audit Committee are committed to ensuring the independence of the independent registered public accountants, both in fact and in appearance. In this regard, the Audit Committee has established apre-approval policy in accordance with applicable securities rules. The Audit Committee’spre-approval policy is set forth in the Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policy, which is available on our website athttp://investors.jackinthebox.com.

30    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 35

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL TWO — RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

PROPOSAL TWO — RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Audit Committee has appointed the firm of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for fiscal year 2018.2022. Although action by stockholders in this matter is not required, the Audit Committee believes it is appropriate to seek stockholder ratification of this appointment.

KPMG LLP has served as the Company’s independent auditor since 1986. One or more representatives of KPMG LLP is expected to be present atattend the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement and to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders present at the meeting. The following proposal will be presented at the Annual Meeting:

Action by the Audit Committee appointing KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accountants to conduct the annual audit of the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018,October 2, 2022, is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.

Vote Required for Ratification

Ratification requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on such proposal. Abstentions will be included in the number of shares present and entitled to vote and will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” this proposal. Brokers have discretionary authority to vote uninstructed shares on this matter.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT31


36 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL THREE — ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

PROPOSAL THREE — ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

As required under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), stockholders have the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”) as disclosed in the CD&A, the compensation tables, narrative disclosures, and related footnotes included in this Proxy Statement. This “Say on Pay” vote is advisory, and therefore nonbinding on the Company; however, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which is comprised entirely of independent directors, values the opinions of our stockholders and will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions. We received a 96.3%92.8% favorable vote on Say on Pay at our February 20172021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Compensation Committee engages the services of an independent compensation consultant to advise on executive compensation matters, including competitive compensation targets within the marketplace, and Company performance goals and analysis.

As discussed in more detail in the CD&A, our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain a talented team of executives who can deliver on our commitment to build long-term stockholder value. The Compensation Committee believes our program is competitive in the marketplace, links pay to performance by rewarding our NEOs for achievement of short-term and long-term financial and operational goals (and, in some years, strategic goals), and aligns our NEOs’ interests with the long-termlong- term interests of our stockholders by providing a mix of performance and service-based equity awards. Specifically, a significant portion of compensation paid to our NEOs is based on the Company’s business performance.

Our fiscal 20172021 NEOs consist of three Brand Services executives supporting both brands, namelyinclude our Chief Executive Officer (CEO),; Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (CFO); Vice President, Controller and Financial Reporting (Former Interim PFO); Executive Vice President, Chief LegalMarketing Officer (CMO); Senior Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer (CSCO); Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer (CPO); and RiskFormer Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer (CLO), and the Jack in the Box Brand President and the Qdoba Brand President.

(CIO).

The Compensation Committee believes stockholders should consider the following key components of our compensation programs and governance practices when voting on this proposal:

Pay for Performance Orientation

Competitive, Targeted PayPay.. We target executive base salary, total cash compensation, and total direct compensation to deliver competitive pay for performance that meets expectations, and the opportunity for higher pay only if performance exceeds expectations.

Pay MixMix.. Our executive compensation program includes a mix of fixed and variable compensation, with a majoritysignificant portion of target compensation in the form of annual and long-term incentives that directly tie to achievement of key Company financial and strategic goals and drive long-term stockholder value.

Long-Term IncentivesIncentive (“LTI”).. Annual equity awards for our NEOs in fiscal 2021 included a mix of stock options, performance shares (“PSUs”) and time-vested restricted stock units (“RSUs”), equally weighted, and with holding requirements. The PSUs vest three years after the grant dependingdate with the final number of PSUs earned based on the Company’s achievement of Company financial goals over a three-fiscal year period. The grant guidelines, goals, and performance metrics for the LTIPSU awards granted in November 2016December 2020 for the performance period fiscal 2017-20192021-2023 are further described in the CD&A.

20172021 Annual IncentivesIncentive.. In 2017,2021, our NEOs’ annual incentive opportunity was based partly on two financial metrics, (1) Operating Earnings Per Share (“EPS”EBIT (weighted 50%) and (2) System Same-Store Sales (weighted 30%), with (a) the Brand Services executives’and Strategic Goals (weighted 20%). The total incentive also partly based on a consolidated Restaurant Operating Margin (“ROM”) target;payout attained was between target and (b) the Jackmaximum performance, as described further in the Box and Qdoba Brand Presidents’ incentive opportunity partly based on their respective brand’s Earnings from Operations and ROM.

CD&A.

The three Brand Services NEOs earned an annual incentive payment based on the Company performing just above its threshold financial performance target for EPS. As the Company did not achieve its threshold consolidated ROM target (on a consolidated basis or by either brand), there was no payout for ROM.

The Jack in the Box and Qdoba Brand Presidents earned an annual incentive payment based on the Company’s EPS achievement, which was a smaller proportion of their total incentive opportunity than it was for the Brand Services executives. As neither brand met its threshold financial targets on Earnings from Operations or ROM, there was no payout for these metrics.

32    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 37

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL THREE — ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Alignment with Long-Term Stockholder Interests

Equity Awards. The largest portion of our NEOs’ total pay is delivered in equity awards (including options,(for fiscal 2021, PSUs and RSUs), with such equity awards accounting for 68%60% of the CEO’sMr. Harris targeted total direct compensation in fiscal 2017.

2021.

Option awards

The RSUs granted in fiscal 2021 vest 25% per year over four years, and time-vested RSUs have multi-year vesting;the PSUs granted in fiscal 2021 vest at the end of a three-year performance awards areperiod based on achievement of financial goals over a three-fiscal year period.

pre-established performance goals. All RSUs,RSU and PSUs beginningPSU awards granted in fiscal 2016,2021 to our NEOs and other executive officers are subject to a holding requirement, of at leastwhereby each executive must hold 50% ofafter-tax net shares resulting from the vesting of such awards until the executive’s termination or retirement.

of service. Beginning in fiscal 2022, RSU and PSU awards granted to our NEOs and other executive officers will be subject to a revised holding requirement, whereby each executive must hold 50% of after-tax net shares resulting from the vesting of such awards until the executive meets their multiple of base
salary stock ownership requirement (“hold until met”). This change was made to better align our holding requirement with prevailing market practice.

Stock Ownership Requirement. Our NEOs and other senior executivesexecutive officers are required to own a significant amount of the Company’s stock, based on a multiple of salary.

base salary, in addition to the holding requirement on after-tax net shares resulting from the vesting of PSUs and RSUs.

No Evergreen No Repricing. We do not have an evergreen plan, and we prohibit repricing equity awards without stockholder approval.

No Pledging or HedgingHedging.. We As described in greater detail in the CD&A, we prohibit Section 16 officers (including our NEOs and Corporate Vice Presidentsother executive officers) from pledging Company stock as collateral for any obligation or engaging in hedging transactions involving our stock.

Recommendation

With the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee has thoughtfully developed our executive compensation programs, setting NEO compensation that links pay to performance and provides an appropriate balance of short-term and long-term incentives that are aligned with long-term stockholder interests. Accordingly, the Board of Directors recommends that you vote in favor of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that Jack in the Box Inc. stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as described in the Company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis, tabular disclosures, and other narrative disclosures in this Proxy Statement for the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.”

Approval of the Say on Pay proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on such proposal. Abstentions will be included in the number of shares present and entitled to vote and will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal. Brokernon-votes will not count as votes cast “FOR” or “AGAINST” the proposal and will not be included in calculating the number of votes necessary for approval for this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT33


38 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) explains the key objectives and elements of our executive compensation program and the compensation decisions for our named executive officers (“NEOs”) in fiscal 2017.2021. The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors (the “Committee”), with input from its independent compensation consultant, oversees these programs and determines compensation for our NEOs.

Our fiscal year 20172021 NEOs are:

• Darin S. Harris

Leonard A. Comma

Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), our principal executive officer

• Timothy E. Mullany(1)

Jerry P. Rebel

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), our principal financial officer

• Dawn E. Hooper(2)
Vice President, Controller and Financial Reporting, our former interim principal financial officer (“Interim PFO”)

• Ryan L. Ostrom(1)

Frances L. Allen

Jack in the Box Brand President (“JIB President”)

Keith M. Guilbault

Qdoba Brand President (“Qdoba President”)

Phillip H. Rudolph

Executive Vice President, Chief LegalMarketing Officer (“CMO”)
• Dean C. Gordon
Senior Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer (“CSCO”)
• Steven Piano(1)
Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer (“CPO”)
• Andrew T. Martin(3)
(Former) Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer (“CIO”)
(1)
Messrs. Mullany, Ostrom and RiskPiano joined the Company in January 2021, February 2021, and April 2021, respectively.
(2)
Ms. Hooper was appointed Interim Principal Financial Officer (“CLO”)effective August 10, 2020, and Corporate Secretary

she served in that role until Mr. Mullany joined the Company on January 18, 2021 as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer. Prior to becoming Interim PFO, and currently, Ms. Hooper serves as the Company’s Vice President, Controller and Financial Reporting, a non-executive officer position. Ms. Hooper was only a NEO by reason of her Interim PFO role and accordingly, as described in this CD&A. Ms. Hooper was not a participant in the same executive compensation programs for our other executive officers.

(3)
Mr. Martin separated employment with the Company on May 7, 2021.

Quick Reference Guide

Executive Summary
Section I

Executive Summary

Section I

Compensation Principles and Objectives

Section II

Compensation Competitive Analysis

Section III

Elements of Compensation

Section IV

Compensation Decision-Making Process

Section V

Fiscal 20172021 Compensation

Section VI

Additional Compensation Information

Section VII

34    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure
Section VIII

  CD&A — I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Jack in the Box is committed to responsibly building long-term stockholder value. Our executive compensation program is designed to deliver on this commitment by using a balanced performance measurement framework that is aligned with the key drivers of Company performance and stockholder value creation. This executive summary provides an overview of our fiscal 20172021 performance, compensation framework and pay actions, targeted total direct compensation, and CEO pay for performance alignment.

a. Fiscal 20172021 Review
Fiscal 2021 was another uniquely challenging year for the restaurant industry, but due to our innovation, perseverance, and continued focus on making significant progress on our strategic pillars and growth objectives, it was also a very exciting year for Jack in the Box, our employees, franchisees, and the communities in which we operate, as we laid much of the foundation for the brand’s future success.
In spite of significant challenges posed by the COVID pandemic, fiscal 2021 included many achievements. We continued to successfully execute on our growth strategy by, among other things, improving our relationship and alignment with franchisees, kickstarting our unit growth strategy, creating modular and flexible restaurant designs, and enhancing the digital experience for our guests. Furthermore, we strengthened our uniquely broad menu, with the addition of Spicy Tiny Tacos and an improved Cluck Sandwich, as well as the return of Popcorn Chicken and Monster Tacos.
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 39

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Our marketing and advertising efforts during fiscal 2021 – including the “Jackletes” college athlete platform, owning Chicken (Alaska), and a partnership with musician and viral star Jason Derulo – also built brand awareness and drove sales. In addition to these accomplishments, we also continued to drive systemwide financial and operational performance, and for the eleventh consecutive year, we achieved same-store sales growth.
Returns to Stockholders

The Company’sCompany returned approximately $237.6 million to shareholders through stock price increased 6.2%buybacks and dividends in Fiscal 2021, and continues to $101.92 per share at fiscalyear-end (“FYE”) 2017, versus $95.94 at FYE 2016, on top ofoffer a 20.4% increaseviable long-term opportunity for shareholders seeking a value-oriented stock with a new, growth-focused strategy in FY 2016.

place.

Cumulative total shareholder return increased year over year, and increased for the sixth consecutive year in fiscal 2017. TheTSR-CEOpay-for-performance alignment graph in Section I.d. below illustrates how CEO pay has corresponded to performance over the last five years.

Financial and Operational Results

While we made progress on key strategic initiatives, fiscal 2017 was a challenging year for

Systemwide sales increased 13.1% year-over-year. The increase is inclusive of the Company.

Systemwide same-store sales grew 0.5% at Jackfavorable 53rd week in the Box (“JIB”), but declined 1.4% at Qdoba.

fourth quarter of 2021, which resulted in incremental systemwide sales of $77.9 million. Excluding the 53rd week, systemwide sales in fiscal 2021 increased 11.0% year-over-year.

Consolidated restaurant operating margin (“ROM”)

System same-store sales1(1) declined 260 basis points to 17.6%increased 10.3% year-over-year, marking the eleventh consecutive year of same-store sales with JIB margin down 110 basis points to 20.1% of sales, and Qdoba margins down 450 basis points to 13.6% of sales.

growth.

Total revenues increased 12.0% year-over-year. The increase is inclusive of the favorable 53rd week in the fourth quarter of 2021, which resulted in incremental revenue of approximately $21.3 million.

Operating Earnings Per Share (“Operating EPS”)2 of $3.88

Net earnings and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”)(2)increased approximately 3% over prior year, excluding84.7% and 90.9% year-over-year, respectively.
Earnings from operations increased 25.7% year-over-year.
Adjusted EBITDA(3) increased 20.9% year-over-year to $331.4 million. The increase is inclusive of the $0.09 benefit from thefavorable 53rd week in fiscal 2016.

the fourth quarter of 2021, which resulted in incremental Adjusted EBITDA of $5.6 million.

Restaurant level margin(4) decreased 40 basis points year-over-year to 24.2% of company-owned restaurant sales.
Franchise level margin(4) increased 210 basis points year-over-year to 42.0%, or $317.6 million.

The Company made progress onkey strategic initiatives, including reducing our corporate general

Net units decreased 1.0% year-over-year with 37 closures and administrative expenses (“G&A”), and refranchising 178 JIB restaurants which increased our franchise mix from 82% at14 store openings during the end of fiscal 2016 to 88% at 2017 fiscalyear-end.year.

Impact on Incentive Compensation

The Operating EPS result was just slightly above the minimum threshold goal for annual incentive compensation.

The Company fell short of its threshold goals on systemwide sales and ROM at both brands.

As a result, the CEO and other Brand Services NEOs received annual incentive payouts of less than 9% of target, and the Jack in the Box and Qdoba brand presidents received below 4% of target.

Other

During fiscal 2017, the Company retained Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC to assist our Board of Directors in its evaluation of potential strategic alternatives with respect to the Qdoba business, as well as other ways to enhance shareholder value. Following the completion of a robust process, our Board determined that the sale of Qdoba is the best alternative for enhancing shareholder value and is consistent with our desire to transition to a less capital-intensive business model. In December 2017, we announced that the Company had entered into an agreement to sell Qdoba Restaurant Corporation for approximately $305 million in cash. The transaction is expected to close by April 2018.

1
(1)

As set forthSystem same-store sales represents changes in Note 1 insales at company and franchise restaurants open more than one year. Franchise sales represent sales at franchise restaurants and are revenues of our franchisees. We do not record franchise sales as revenues; however, our royalty revenues and percentage rent revenues are calculated based on a percentage of franchise sales. We believe system same-store sales information is useful to investors as it has a direct effect on the Proxy Summary, restaurant operating margin isCompany’s profitability.

(2)
Fiscal year 2020 Diluted EPS included non-recurring items, notably a pension settlement charge and the sale of a corporate office building, that affect the comparability to fiscal year 2021 Diluted EPS.
(3)
Adjusted EBITDA represents net earnings on a GAAP basis excluding income taxes, interest expense, net, gains or losses on the sale of company-operated restaurants, impairment and other charges, net, depreciation and amortization, the amortization of franchise tenant improvement allowances and other, and pension settlement charges. See “Appendix A - Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measurements to GAAP Results.”
(4)
Restaurant-Level Margin and Franchise-Level Margin are non-GAAP measure. For a reconciliation of this measuremeasures. These non-GAAP measures are reconciled to earnings from operations, the most comparable GAAP measure, please referin the attachment to this release. See “Appendix A - Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measurements to GAAP Results.”
(5)
Operating EBIT is a non-GAAP measure defined by the Company as net earnings before interest expense, net and income taxes, excluding gains or losses on the sale of company operated restaurants and/or the sale of the corporate office facility, restructuring costs and/or other non-recurring charges, any gain or loss associated with the Company’s corporate-owned life insurance policies (COLI), net period benefit costs/credits or settlement gain/loss related to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-Kpension and accompanying press release filed November 29, 2017.

post-retirement health plans, and earnings or losses from discontinued operations. See “Appendix A — Reconciliation of non-GAAP measurements to GAAP Results.”
2

As set forth in Note 2 in the Proxy Summary, Operating EPS is anon-GAAP measure. For a reconciliation of this measure to the most comparable GAAP measure, please refer to the Company’s Current Report on Form8-K and accompanying press release filed November 29, 2017.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT35


40 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Incentive Compensation Results
Annual Incentive Plan – Weighted payout equal to 143.3% of target payout for our CEO and 179.2% of target payout for our other NEOs.
Performance Metric
Weight
Target Goal
Maximum Goal
Result
Actual Payout(1)
(% of Target)
Operating EBIT
First-half FY21 goal
25%
$125.8 million
$127.4 million
$144.7 million
CEO: 150%
Other NEOs: 200%
Second-half FY21 goal
25%
$125.0 million
$127.6 million
$132.0 million
CEO: 150%
Other NEOs: 200%
System Same-Store Sales
First-half FY21 goal
15%
10.4%
12.4%
15.9%
CEO: 150%
Other NEOs: 200%
Second-half FY21 goal
15%
4.0%
6.0%
4.8%
CEO: 120%
Other NEOs: 140%
Strategic Goals
A. Be a Great Franchisor
7.5%
See CD&A Section VI.b for a
description of the pre-established
strategic goals
A. Maximum
All NEOs: 150%
B. Brand Position and Strategy
5%
B. Target
All NEOs: 100%
C. Ignite Development and Growth
7.5%
C. Maximum
All NEOs: 150%
(1)
The maximum incentive payout for our CEO for both the financial goals and the strategic goals is 150% of target payout; and for our other NEOs, the maximum payout is 200% of target payout for the financial goals and 150% of target payout for the strategic goals. Performance and payouts are between performance levels and payout opportunity.
Long-Term Incentive Plan – For PSUs vested and payable in 2021 (granted in November 2018 for the three-fiscal year performance period FY2019-FY2021), the weighted payout resulted in 131.0% of the target number of PSUs granted. Mr. Gordon is the only NEO who received this payout.
Performance Metric
Weight
Target Goal
Result
Payout % of
PSUs Granted
Adjusted Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) from Operations(6) (ROIC at FYE 2021)
50%
22.5%
46.8%
150.0%
Systemwide Sales ($M) (Goals set annually)
Year 1 – 16.7%
$3,566.0
$3,504.7
69.3%
Year 2 – 16.7%
$3,631.0
$3,672.7
116.5%
Year 3 – 16.7%
$3,933.0
$4,155.3
150.0%
Leadership Transitions
During fiscal 2021, Mr. Harris focused on building a senior executive leadership team that possessed the key skills, knowledge, and experience to strengthen the Company’s relationship with its franchisees and to grow the brand over the long-term, resulting in several leadership changes:
On January 18, 2021, Mr. Mullany commenced employment as our new Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Ms. Hooper completed her assignment as Interim PFO, returning to her position as Vice President, Controller and Financial Reporting.
On February 1, 2021, Mr. Ostrom commenced employment as our new Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer.
On April 26, 2021, Mr. Piano commenced employment as our new Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer.
Mr. Martin (Former CIO) separated employment with the Company on May 7, 2021.
(6)
Adjusted ROIC from Operations is calculated as after-tax earnings from operations, excluding gains or losses on the sale of company-operated restaurants and restructuring charges, divided by average invested capital (which excludes accumulated other comprehensive income or loss related to the Company’s retirement plans).
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 41

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
b. Fiscal 20172021 Compensation Framework and Key Pay Actions

Our executive compensation program is designed to motivate, engage, and retain a talented executive leadership team and to appropriately reward them for their contributions to our business. Our performance measurement framework consists of a combination of financial and operationalmultiple performance metrics, varying time horizons, and multiple equity vehicles. The largest portion of our executives’ compensation is variable and is directly tied to the achievement of annual and longer-term financial and operating goals.goals, and stock price performance. In combination, these metrics and variablesvehicles provide a balanced and comprehensive view of performance and drive the Committee’s executive compensation decisions.

Consistent with the fundamental principle that compensation programs should align pay with performance, the Company’s fiscal 20172021 performance directly impacted compensation decisions and pay outcomes, as shown below in the chart below that summarizes the compensation framework and key fiscal 20172021 performance measures and 2017 pay actions.

LOGO

In fiscal 2017, the Company only gave pay increases to restaurant employees – no increases were given to NEOs, executives and staff as part of an enterprise-wide cost savings initiative. Base Salary Annual Incentive BRAND SERVICES CEO, CFO, CLO 70% Jack in the Box Inc. Operating Earnings Per Share (EPS) 30% Consolidated Restaurant Operating Margin (ROM) JACK IN THE BOX Brand President 30% Jack in the Box Inc. Operating Earnings Per Share (EPS) 40% JIB Earnings from Operations 30% JIB Restaurant Operating Margin (ROM) QDOBA Brand President 30% Jack in the Box Inc. Operating Earnings Per Share (EPS) 40% Qdoba Earnings from Operations 30% Qdoba Restaurant Operating Margin (ROM) 2017 Results Annual incentives were paid at 8.8% of target payout, based on the weighted results below. EPS was just above the minimum threshold goal (8.8% of target payout). Consolidated ROM did not reach the minimum threshold goal (No payout). 2017 Results Annual incentives were paid at 3.8% of target payout, based on the weighted results below. EPS was just above the minimum threshold goal (3.8% of target payout). JIB Earnings from Operations did not reach the minimum threshold goal (No payout). JIB ROM did not reach the minimum threshold goal (No payout). 2017 Results Annual incentives were paid at 3.8% of target payout, based on the weighted results below. EPS was just above the minimum threshold goal (3.8% of target payout). Qdoba Earnings from Operations did not reach the minimum threshold goal (No payout). Qdoba ROM did not reach the minimum threshold goal (No payout). Long-Term Incentive 34% Stock Options 33% vesting per year 7 year term 33%

Performance Share Units (PSUs) Vesting based on performance goal achievement over three-fiscal year performance period,Measurement Framework with 50% holding requirement 33% Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) 25% vesting per year, with 50% holding requirement ROIC Goal (50%) Return on Invested Capital From Operations (“ROIC”) Sales Goal (50%) Consolidated Systemwide Sales (All Restaurants) 2017 Actions For the FY 2017-2019 PSU grant, the Committee established two goals: (1) an adjusted ROIC from Operations measure based on the third fiscal year of the three-fiscal year performance period (FY 2019), and (2) Consolidated Systemwide Sales Growth, with goals set annually at the beginning of each fiscal year of the three-fiscal year performance period. For the FY 2015-2017 PSU grant, the Committee certified goal achievement and approved a payout of 118.6% of target PSUs granted based on performance during the three-fiscal year performance period, as described in Section VI.c. of the CD&A.

36    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT

2021 Pay


Base Salary
  In November 2020, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Martin (our former CIO), and Ms. Hooper (who was serving as Interim PFO) received salary increases to maintain market competitiveness and recognize individual performance.
Annual Incentive
Fiscal 2021 Design

Fiscal 2021 Results
Annual incentives were paid at 143.3% of target payout for our CEO (maximum payout of 150% of target payout for both the financial goals and the strategic goals), and 179.2% of target payout for our other NEOs (maximum payout of 200% of target payout for the financial goals and 150% of target payout for the strategic goals), based on the weighted results described in CD&A Section VI.b. Payouts were prorated for NEOs who joined the Company during fiscal 2021.
42 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Long-Term Incentive
Fiscal 2021 Design

Ms. Hooper received an annual equity award of RSUs in December 2020 in her capacity as a non-executive officer that vests 33% per year over three years and is not subject to stock holding requirements. Mr. Martin forfeited the annual equity award he received in fiscal 2021 upon his separation of employment with the Company in May 2021.
Fiscal 2021 Actions Relating to PSU Grants
•  For the FY 2021-2023 PSU grant,

the Committee established two goals (1) an adjusted ROIC from Operations measure and (2) a Systemwide Sales growth measure, each based on performance at the end of the third fiscal year of the three-fiscal year performance period (FY 2023).
•  For the FY 2019-2021 PSU grant, the Committee certified goal achievement and approved a payout of 131.0% of target PSUs granted, based on performance for the three-fiscal year performance period, as described in CD&A Section VI.c.
Special Pay Actions
•  Upon the completion of Ms. Hooper ’s service as Interim PFO in January 2021, her base salary was adjusted to reflect the reduction of the $7,500 per month increase she received as Interim PFO.
•  During fiscal 2021, in consultation with its independent compensation consultant, the Board established compensation packages to induce Messrs. Mullany, Ostrom, and Piano to join the Company, each of which included (a) a market-competitive salary, (b) a one-time cash bonus subject to repayment under certain circumstances, (c) an equity award of RSU/PSUs and/or a one-time RSU equity award, and (d) relocation assistance. Mr. Mullany received a one-time cash bonus of $150,000, and Messrs. Ostrom and Piano each received a one-time cash bonus of $200,000. In addition, pursuant to their compensation packages, Messrs. Mullany, Ostrom, and Piano were each eligible to receive receive a prorated annual incentive incentive based on the Company’s fiscal year performance, and they each received one or more equity awards as described in CD&A Section VI.c – “Equity Awards for New Executive Officers.”
•  Mr. Martin separated employment with the Company in May 2021 in connection with the restructuring of the executive leadership team. He received severance benefits as described in the section entitled “Potential Payments on Termination of Employment or Change in Control” of this Proxy Statement.
JACK IN THE BOX INC.��� |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
c. Fiscal 2017 Targeted Total Direct Compensation2021 Pay Mix

The chart below shows the

A significant percentage breakdown of targetedour NEO’s target total direct compensation (“TDC”) (consisting of base salary, target annual incentive, and target long-term incentive) for each NEO in fiscal 2017. Target TDC is set within a competitive range of the median of “Market” compensation based on market data and advice provided by the Committee’s independent consultant (as described in Section III.a “Compensation Competitive Analysis”). Consistent with our objective of pay for performance alignment (described in Section II “Compensation Principles and Objectives”), the largest portion of compensation is variableat-risk pay delivered in the form of annual and long-term incentives, including annual incentive, stock options and PSUs. In fiscal 2017, 61.5%representing 80% of our CEO’s pay was at risk, and54%-55% of pay for our other NEOs was at risk.

LOGO

CEO — 2017 TDC

For fiscal 2017, the Committee determined that the target TDC for our CEO, would be $5.7 millionand an average of 60% of target TDC for our other NEOs (excluding Ms. Hooper, who completed her Interim PFO assignment in January 2021 and participated in the compensation programs for her non-executive officer role as Vice President, Controller and Financial Reporting).

The at-risk, performance-based components of our fiscal 2021 executive compensation program (consisting of base salary of $900,000, target annual incentive of $900,000, and target long-term incentivePSUs), represents 50% of $3.9 million), which was approximately 7% below thetarget TDC Market median.

    Target   SCT (1) 

Salary

  $900,000   $900,000 

Annual Incentive

  $900,000   $78,660 

Long-Term Incentive (LTI)

  $3,900,000   $3,654,992 

FY 2017 Annual TDC

  $5,700,000   $4,633,652 
for our CEO and an average of 42% of target TDC for our other NEOs (excluding Ms. Hooper).


(1)

This column showschart excludes (a) the CEO’s actualTDC--target TDC for Ms. Hooper, who did not participate in our executive compensation program for fiscal 2021, as reflected in the “Summary Compensation” (“SCT”)described above, and “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” tables. The difference between Target and SCT compensation is due to: (a) on the Annual Incentive,(b) Mr. Comma’s fiscal 2017 payout amounting to only 8.8% of target (due toMartin, who separated his employment with the Company substantially under-performing target performance on its goals); and (b) on the LTI: (i) the difference in stock price between the price on the actual grant date of the long-term incentive awards and the earlier60-day average price used by the Committee to establish the number of options, RSUs and PSUs to be granted; and (ii) the SCT use of the grant date fair value for RSU and PSU awards, as described in the footnotes to those tables.

May 2021.

The LTI components are described in detail in proxy Section VI.d “Fiscal 2017 Compensation — Long-Term Incentive Compensation.”

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT37


  CD&A — I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  

d. CEO Compensation and Pay for Performance Alignment

Each year, the Committee assesses our CEO’s actual compensation relative to the Company’s performance. The following graph below shows the relationship of our CEO’s actual TDC compared to our cumulative total shareholder return (TSR) performance in each of the last five fiscal years. Actual TDC in this chart includes base salary, actual annual incentive earned for the fiscal year, and the long-term incentive grant date award value, based on the stock price at the time of grant,all as detailedreported in the section immediately above. Pay for performance alignment is shown relative to the TDC of our current CEO, Mr. Comma, for fiscal 2014-2017, and relative to our former CEO, Ms. Lang, for fiscal 2013.SCT.
44 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As illustrated the Company’s TSRbelow, pay and performance has increased each year, and CEO compensation wasare generally aligned, with higher pay in years with strong financial and TSR performance, and lower pay in years when financial performance did not meet goals and/or TSR declined. In fiscal 2021, however, our TSR increased more than 23% year-over-year, while our CEO’s compensation declined. The year-over-year reduction in our CEO’s compensation is not a reflection of poor financial or TSR performance, as evidenced above, but rather reflects the Company’s TSR. However, CEO pay decreased despite an increase in TSRlower target compensation structure established in fiscal 2014 (during2020 for the transition fromCEO position to ensure sound alignment with pay for performance following the former CEO to the current CEO). And in fiscal 2017, CEO pay decreased from fiscal 2016 due to the Company failing to achieve internal performance targets (our CEO earned 167% of target on his annual incentive in FY 2016, but less than 9% of target in FY 2017). Even without the impact of the 2016 special award described in Note 2 to the chart, ongoing CEO total direct compensation decreased from 2016 to 2017.

LOGO

transition.


(1)

(1)    

The graph above shows the cumulative return to holders of the Company’s Common Stock at September 30th of each year assuming $100 was invested on September 30, 2012,2016, and assumes reinvestment of dividends. The Company began paying dividends in fiscal 2014.

(2)    2016 Special Retention Award: In fiscal 2016, the CEO was awarded a special stock award (reflected in the top portion of the FY 2016 bar) to recognize the criticality of his role and the Company’s strong performance under his leadership, and to incentivize him to remain with the Company while providing measured increases to ongoing, target TDC. Thisone-time RSU grant (detailed in our 2017 Proxy Statement), which cliff vests 50% four years from the grant date and the remaining 50% five years from grant, is not included in “total direct compensation.”

e.Say-on-Pay Feedback from Stockholders

In 2017,2021, we sought an advisory vote from our stockholders regarding our executive compensation program and received a 96.3%92.8% favorable vote supporting the program. Each year, the Committee considers the results of the advisory vote as it completes its annual review of each pay element and the compensation provided to our NEOs and other executives. Given the significant level of stockholder support and our stockholder outreach throughout the year, the Committee concluded that our executive compensation program continues to align executive pay with stockholder interests and provides competitive pay that encourages retention and effectively incentivizes performance of talented NEOs and executives. Accordingly, the Committee determined not to make any significant changes to our programs as a result of the vote. The Committee will continue to consider the outcome of oursay-on-pay votes and our stockholders’ views when making future compensation decisions for the NEOs and executives.

38    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 45

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — II. COMPENSATION PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES

II. COMPENSATION PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES


The Committee focuses on the following principles and objectives in determining and measuring the various components of our executive compensation programs:

Competitive target pay structure, including base salary, annual incentive, and long-term incentives that enable us to attract and retain talented, experienced executives who can deliver successful business performance and drive long-term stockholder value.

Pay for performance alignment, with a higher percentagethe largest proportion of executive pay in the form of annual and long-term incentives that directly tie payouts, if any, to the achievement of incentive goals.

corporate goals and strategies.

Comprehensive goal setting, with financial, operational, and/orand strategic performance metrics that drive long-term stockholder value.

Incentivizing balanced short-term and long-term executive decision making, through variable compensation components (cash and stock) using varying timeframes.

Executive alignment with stockholder interests, through stock ownership and holding requirements.

requirements that build and maintain an executive’s equity investment in the company.

Sound governance practices and principles in plan design and pay decisions, with the Committee considering both what and how performance is achieved.

Management of compensation risk, by establishing incentive goals that avoid placing too much emphasis on any one metric or performance time horizon, thereby discouraging excessive or unwise risk-taking.

Internal Pay Equity

Our compensation programs are designed so that potential compensation opportunities are appropriate relative to each executive’s level of responsibility and impact. While program design is similar for executives at the same level, actual pay may vary based on job scope and individual performance over time. In fiscal 2017,Additionally, we strive to ensure pay equity between our CEO’s targeted TDC was approximately 3.1 times higher thanfemale employees and male employees performing equal or substantially similar work. Each year, we review the next highestmedian pay of our male and female employees, share the results with the Board of Directors, and take remedial action as appropriate to ensure that male and female employees are paid executive.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT39

equally.


46 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — III. COMPENSATION COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

III. COMPENSATION COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS


a. Competitive Analysis

Each year the Committee relies on multiple data points to assess the competitiveness of our executive compensation program and the individual compensation of our executives. Information the Committee uses to perform this analysis includes:

The Company’s performance against its financial and operationalperformance goals;

The mix of short-term and long-term compensation in the form of cash and equity-based compensation;

A review of “Market”market compensation data provided by the Committee’s independent consultant, which includes data from (a) proxy statement disclosures of our Peer Group (described below), and (b) a restaurant industry compensation survey, and (c) general industry data from national compensation surveys; and

The Company’s financial performance relative to our Peer Group.

b. Fiscal 20172021 Peer Group

We use a Peer Group to assess

Each year the competitive pay levels of our NEOsCommittee reviews and other executives, and to evaluate program design elements. The Committee believesapproves the Peer Group should consistthat its independent compensation consultant uses in its market analysis of a combination of restaurantcompetitive compensation levels and retail companies because these areprogram design elements, and for which the primary companies with which we competeCommittee then references when determining target total compensation levels and practices for executive talent.

our NEOs.

Our practice in selecting Peer Group companies is to look forfocus primarily on companies in the restaurant industry thatwho are comparable in size (GAAPscale, as measured by, among other criteria, systemwide sales, revenue, market capitalizationfranchise mix, number of locations, number of employees, and systemwide sales) generallydining format. In July 2020, the
Committee established the fiscal 2021 Peer Group with an emphasis on companies with revenue between 0.5x0.33x and 2.0x3.0x that of Jack in the Box Inc. The Committee also considers number of locations, business models and consumer focus. In reviewinghighly franchised companies with systemwide sales comparisons,between 0.33x and 3.0x that of Jack in the Committee focuses onBox. This resulted in removing three companies from our fiscal 2020 Peer Group (Bloomin’ Brands, Inc.; Brinker International Inc.; and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.) and adding seven companies (Shake Shack Inc.; Del Taco Restaurants, Inc.; Ruth’s Hospitality Group Inc.; Noodles & Co.; El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.; Chuy’s Holdings Inc.; and Wingstop Inc.). The table below lists the eleven restaurant companies in the fiscal 2021 Peer Group.
Fiscal 2021 Peer Group (for which comparative data is applicable). Given the small number of

public restaurant companies that meet the above criteria, our Peer Group also includes retail companies, using the same criteria described above.

For 2017, the Committee’s independent consultant recommended that no changes be made to the Peer Group. At the time the Committeere-affirmed using the same Peer Group for fiscal 2017, the Peer Group members’ median trailing four-quarter revenue was $2.3 billion and the median market capitalization (as most recently reported) was $2.4 billion, compared with projected Jack in the Box Inc. trailing four-quarter revenue of $1.5 billion and market cap of $2.8 billion. For the Peer Group restaurant companies, median systemwide sales (as of their most recently completed fiscal year) was $4.4 billion, compared to $4.5 billion projected for Jack in the Box.

Company Name
2017 Peer Group
RestaurantRetail

Brinker International,

BJ’s Restaurants, Inc.

Chico’s FAS

Chuy’s Holdings Inc.

Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc.

Children’s Place Retail Stores Inc.

The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated

DSW Inc.

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

Express, Inc.


Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.

Finish Line,

Del Taco Restaurants Inc.

DineEquity, Inc

Genesco

Denny’s Corporation
Dine Brands Global Inc.


Domino’s Pizza, Inc.


El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.
Noodles & Co.

Urban Outfitters, Inc.

Panera Bread Company

Papa John’s International Inc.

Sonic Corporation


Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.
Ruth’s Hospitality Group Inc.
Shake Shack Inc.
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
The Cheesecake Factory Inc.
The Wendy’s Company


Wingstop Inc.

40    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 47

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — IV. ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

IV. ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION


Our executive compensation programs consist of the elements summarized below, and are designed to (a) achieve our compensation principles and objectives, (b) enable the Company to attract, retain, motivate, engage, and reward our NEOs and other executives, and (c) encourage an appropriate level of risk taking, as discussed later in this CD&A.

Element /


Type of Plan

Link to Compensation Objectives
Key Features

Current Year Performance

Base Salary



(Cash)

• Fixed amount ofcash compensation for performingday-to-day responsibilities. Provides financial stabilityto attract and security, and represents the smallest portion of TDC.retain executive talent that drives Company success.
Competitive pay that is targeted to approximate a reasonable range of the median of the Market, taking into accountmarket relative to job scope and complexity and criticality of position, and individual knowledge, skills and experience. Generally, executivesBase salary levels are eligible for an annual salary increase, dependingreviewed annually and may be adjusted if appropriate based on individual performance, market pay changes, and internal equity.
Annual
Incentive  

(Cash)

Annual

Incentive

(Cash)

• Variable compensation component.cash compensation.
 Motivates and rewards for achievement of annual financial and operationalperformance goals and in some years, other annual strategic objectives.that create long-term stockholder value.
Incentives are targeted to approximate a reasonable range of the Market median. Total potentialmarket median and are set as a percentage of base salary. Actual payouts range from 0% - 200%vary (up to a stated maximum payout amount) as a percentage of target payout.payout based on achievement of pre-established performance targets. Goals and weightingweightings are set annually to align with specific financial, operational, and/or strategic performance objectives andaligned with the Company’s operational plan and budget.Fiscal 20172021 goals are described in Section VI.b.

Multi-Year Performance

Long-Term


Incentive (LTI)



(Equity)

• Variable compensation component.delivered in equity awards.
 Motivates and rewards for sustained long-term financialachieving longer term objectives and operational performance designed to increase long-termincreasing stockholder value.

Encourages continued employment

• Promotes executive retention through requiredmulti-year vesting periods in order to obtain shares.

and potential for wealth accumulation through stock appreciation.

• Stock ownership and holding requirements align the financial interests of our executives with the financial intereststhose of our stockholders.

The target LTI guidelinesaward values are reviewed annually and set to result in total pay that is within a reasonable range of the Marketmarket median. Actual grants may vary from the LTI guidelinetarget based on individual performance. No dividends are paid on unvested RSUs or PSUs.

Stock Options: In For fiscal 2017, option2021, the Committee awarded equity grants consisting exclusively of PSUs and RSUs, which were given equal weighting; no stock options were granted. The Committee chose these forms of equity awards represented 34%because it believes reducing the use of each executive’s LTI guideline; they vest 33% per year over three yearsstock options and expire seven years fromincreasing the grant date. The exercise price is equal to the closing priceweighting of Jack in the Box Common StockPSUs supports our continued focus on the date of grant.

pay-for-performance alignment.


Performance Shares (PSUs): In fiscal 2017,2021, PSUs represented 33%50% of the LTI guideline; theyvalue, vest at the end of three years, and are payable in stock, with the amount vesting based upon achievement ofpre-established performance goals (ranging from zero to 150% of the target number of sharesPSUs granted). Since fiscal 2016, PSUs have beenare subject to a holding requirement (executives must hold 50% ofafter-tax net shares resulting from the vesting of PSUs until termination of service).The goals for the FY 2017-20192021 grant for the fiscal 2021-2023 performance period are described in Section VI.c.

VI.c.


Restricted Stock Units (RSUs): In fiscal 2017,2021, RSUs represented 33%50% of the LTI guideline,value, vest 25% per year over four years, and are payable in stock. RSUs are subject to a holding requirement (executives must hold 50% ofafter-tax net shares resulting from the vesting of RSUs until termination of service). Prior

Beginning in fiscal 2022, RSU and PSU awards granted to FY 2016, RSU awards were generallyour NEOs and other executive officers will be subject to a50-100% revised holding requirement, depending on whetherwhereby each executive must hold 50% of after-tax net shares resulting from the recipient had metvesting of such awards until the executive meets their multiple of base salary stock ownership guideline atrequirement (“hold until met”). This change was made to better align our holding requirement with prevailing market practice.

Ms. Hooper received an annual equity award of RSUs that vests 33% per year over three years and is not subject to stock holding requirements. Ms. Hooper was only a NEO by reason of her Interim PFO role and was not a participant in the time of grant.

same executive compensation programs for our other executive officers.

Attraction & Retention

Perquisites

(Cash)

Perquisites

(Cash)

Provides a limited

• Limited cash value for certain other benefits that are typically offered toconsistent with market practices for executives.

A taxable benefit provided to executivesexecutive officers and paidbi-weekly. This benefit bi-weekly, which is intended to assist with each executive’s expenses for financial planning and use of their personal automobile and cell phone for business purposes.
purposes, and to assist with financial planning. Effective October 3, 2021, this benefit was eliminated. Ms. Hooper receives an annual car allowance that is provided to vice presidents that are non-executive officers.

Other

2017 Qdoba President Conditional Transaction Bonus

In connection with the Company’s evaluation of strategic alternatives with respect to Qdoba, the Committee approved a conditional cash bonus to the Qdoba President to assure his continued employment with the Company, payable on the earlier of (a) January 2, 2018 or (b) the consummation of any sale orspin-off of Qdoba.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT41


48 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — IV. ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

Element /


Type of Plan

Link to Compensation Objectives
Key Features
New Hire Awards, Sign-on Bonuses, and Relocation Assistance  

(Cash and Equity)
• Encourages employment, provides financial stability and retention over the longer-term.
To induce three of our NEOs (Messrs. Mullany, Ostrom, and Piano) to join the Company and to facilitate stock ownership prior to the next annual grant in fiscal 2022, the Company provided in each of their respective offer letters (a) a one-time cash bonus, (b) a one-time new hire equity award grant, and (c) relocation assistance, including a limited tax gross-up for certain relocation expenses consistent with the Company’s relocation policy. The respective amounts for each NEO is reported in the SCT and the “All Other Compensation Table”.

Interim PFO


Salary Increase

(Cash)
• Increase in cash compensation for performing increased job responsibilities and to promote retention for Company success during limited critical time period.
Due to her appointment as Interim PFO, Ms. Hooper received a $7,500 per month increase in salary starting on August 10, 2020 and ending on January 24, 2021, following a one-week transition upon Mr. Mullany joining the Company as our Chief Financial Officer.
Retirement


Benefits

(Pension, SERP, 401(k)



(401(k), Deferred Compensation)

EDCP,

Pension)
• Provides market competitive benefits to attract and retain top talent.

• Provides for retirement income to reward service and to encourage retention and commitment to the Company.
401(k) Plan — The 401(k) Plan is a qualified deferred compensation plan that is available to all employees who are at least age 21. The 401(k) Plan includes a Company andmatching contribution of 100% of the first 4% of an employee’s deferred compensation, subject to encourage retention.

annual IRC limits.


Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (“EDCP”) — The EDCP is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that is offered to highly-compensated employees. Participants may receive an annual restoration matching contribution if their deferrals to the 401(k) Plan (and related Company matching contributions) are limited due to tax code limits applicable to the 401(k) Plan. A participant must be employed on the last day of the calendar year to receive the restoration matching contribution.

Pension — The Company’s employee pension plan that provides benefits based on years of service and earnings up to IRC limitations, was closed to employees hired on or after January 1, 2011, and was “sunset” on December 31, 2015 (after which time participants no longer accrue added benefits based on additional pay or service). Four NEOsMr. Gordon and Ms. Hooper are participants in the pension plan.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) — The SERP was closed to new participants in 2007. One NEO, who was hired into an Officer position prior to 2007, is a participant in the plan. The plan provides retirement income on anon-qualified basis, without regard to IRC limitations.

401(k) Plan — The 401(k) Plan is a qualified deferred compensation plan that is available to all employees who are at least age 21. The 401(k) Plan includes a Company matching contribution of up to 4% of compensation deferred by employees, subject to annual IRC limits.

Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (“EDCP”) — The EDCP is anon-qualified deferred compensation plan that is offered to highly-compensated employees. Prior to January 1, 2016, the EDCP included a Company matching contribution of up to 3% of compensation deferred, and beginning January 1, 2016, was replaced with an annual restoration matching contribution for participants whose deferrals to the 401(k) plan (and related Company matching contributions) are limited due to tax code limits applicable to the 401(k) plan. A participant must be employed on the last day of the calendar year to receive the restoration matching contribution. Executives hired or promoted to an Officer position after 2007, and not eligible for the SERP (including four NEOs), also receive a Company contribution to the EDCP for ten years from their hire date dates, equal to 4% of their base salary and annual incentive. In January 2017, Mr. Comma reached the maximum ten years of Company contributions to the EDCP and ceased receiving the enhanced EDCP Company contribution.

42    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 49

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — V. COMPENSATION DECISION-MAKING PROCESS

V. COMPENSATION DECISION-MAKING PROCESS


a. Role of the Compensation Committee

The Committee works closely with its independent consultant and meets regularly, including in executive session without members of Managementthe executive team (“Management”) present, to make decisions on our executive compensation program and on the compensation of our CEO and other executives. The Committee reviews a variety of market data and information, including Company, Peer Group, restaurant/retailrestaurant industry, and general industry compensation information, and considers the recommendations of its independent consultant when making compensation decisions. The Committee Chair reports thekey actions of the Committee to the Board at each regular meeting. The Committee’s responsibilities include, but are not limited to, reviewing and approving:

The Peer Group;

Our compensation principles and objectives;

The amount and form of executive compensation (pay increases, equity grants);

CEO performance and compensation, and executive officer compensation;

Annual and long-term incentive plans and benefit plans;

Performance metrics and goals, and the achievement of annual and long-term incentive plan goals;

Board compensation; and

Annual proxy statement/CD&A disclosure.

b. Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant

The Committee has retained Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC (“Semler Brossy”) as its independent compensation consultant through July 2021 to advise it regarding fiscal 2021 executive compensation decisions. In August 2021, the Committee replaced Semler Brossy with Meridian Compensation Partners (“Meridian” or the “Consultant”) as its new independent compensation consultant since January 2010.consultant. The Consultant reports directly to the Committee and performs no other work for the Company.Committee. The Committee has analyzed whetherassessed the workindependence of Semler Brossy as a compensation consultant raises any conflict of interest, taking into consideration the following factors: (i) whether Semler Brossy provides any other services to the Company; (ii) the amount of fees paid by the Company to Semler Brossy as a percentage of Semler Brossy’s total revenue; (iii) Semler Brossy’s policies and procedures that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest; (iv) any business or personal relationship of Semler Brossy or the individual compensation advisors employed by the firm with any executive officers of the Company; (v) any business or personal relationship of the individual compensation advisors with any member of the Committee; and (vi) any stock of the Company owned by Semler Brossy or the individual compensation advisors whom it employs. The Committee has determined, based on its analysis of the above factors, that the workeach of Semler Brossy and the individual compensation advisors employed by

Semler Brossy as compensation consultants to the CommitteeMeridian and concluded that its respective engagements of these firms has not created any conflict of interest.

The Consultant does the following for the Committee:

Attends Committee meetings;

Provides independent advice to the Committee on current trends and best practices in compensation design and program alternatives, and advises on plans or practices that may improve effectiveness of our compensation program;

Provides and discusses peer group and survey data for competitive comparisons and, based on this information, offers independent recommendations on CEO and NEO compensation;

Reviews the CD&A and other compensation-related disclosures in our proxy statements;

Offers recommendations, insights and perspectives on compensation related matters;

Evaluates and advises the Committee regarding enterprise and related risks associated with executive compensation components, plans and structures; and

Assists the Committee in designing executive compensation programs that are competitive and align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders.

In fiscal 2017,2021, Semler Brossy attended all Committee meetings in person or by video/telephone through July 2021, and Meridian from August 2021 through the end of the fiscal year, including executive sessions as requested, and consulted frequently with the Committee Chair between meetings.

c. Role of the CEO in Compensation Decisions

When making decisions on executive compensation, the Committee considers input from the Company’s CEO, who reviews the performance of the other NEOs and executives and provides his recommendations to the Committee on NEOs’ and other executives’ compensation. The Company’s Chief People CultureOfficer, Compensation and Corporate Strategy Officer (“CPO”), compensation and benefits department,Benefits Department, and the CFO and finance departmentFinance Department also provide information and answer the Committee’s questions regarding Company financial targets and projections. The CEO meets privately with the Committee and its Consultant to discuss his executive pay recommendations and provides his insight and perspectives to the Committee on the reports and recommendations of the Committee’s Consultant relating to plan design and strategies, goal setting, payout structure, stock grants and holding requirements, and related topics.

The Committee reviews and discusses pay decisions related to the CEO in executive session without the CEO or any other members of Management present.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT43


50 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — VI. FISCAL 20172021 COMPENSATION

VI. FISCAL 20172021 COMPENSATION


a. Base Salary

In

The Committee approved the following NEO base salaries for fiscal 2017,2021 to maintain market competitiveness, and to recognize individual performance, skills, and criticality of their roles, using the Company only gave pay increases to restaurant employees — no increasesanalysis and methodology described in Section III.a. “Compensation Competitive Analysis.” Except as otherwise noted below, the fiscal 2021 base salaries were given to executives and staff positions as part of an enterprise-wide cost savings initiative. Accordingly, none of the NEOs received a base salary increase.

2017 Base Salary — No Increases 
Name  Fiscal 2016 Salary   Fiscal 2017 Salary   % Increase 

 

Mr. Comma (CEO)

 

  

 

 

 

 

$900,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

$900,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0.0%

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Rebel (CFO)

 

  

 

 

 

 

$564,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

$564,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0.0%

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. Allen (JIB President)

 

  

 

 

 

 

$515,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

$515,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0.0%

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Guilbault (Qdoba President)

 

  

 

 

 

 

$375,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

$375,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0.0%

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Rudolph (CLO)

 

  

 

 

 

 

$512,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

$512,000

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0.0%

 

 

 

 

effective November 2020.

Name
Salary FYE 2020
Salary FYE 2021
% Increase
Mr. Harris (CEO)(1)
$825,000
$825,000
0.0%
Mr. Mullany (CFO)(2)
N/A
$500,000
N/A
Ms. Hooper (Interim PFO)(3)
$333,000
$255,393
-23.3%
Mr. Ostrom (CMO)(2)
N/A
$480,000
N/A
Mr. Gordon (CSCO)
$363,000
$374,000
3.0%
Mr. Piano (CPO)(2)
N/A
$420,000
N/A
Mr. Martin (Former CIO)(4)
$356,000
$366,000
2.8%
(1)
Mr. Harris joined the Company in June 2020 and did not receive an increase in November 2020.
(2)
Messrs. Mullany, Ostrom, and Piano joined the Company in January 2021, February 2021, and April 2021, respectively.
(3)
Upon the completion of Ms. Hooper’s service as Interim PFO in January 2021, her base salary was adjusted to reflect the reduction of the $7,500 per month increase she received as Interim PFO.
(4)
Mr. Martin’s base salary applied through his separation of employment with the Company on May 7, 2021.
b. Performance-Based Annual Incentive Compensation (Cash)

In November 2016,December 2020, the Committee approved the annual incentive goals for the fiscal 20172021 annual incentive plan (the “AIP”) consistent with the Company’s fiscal 20172021 operational plan and budget approved by the Board. For Brand Services executives (Mr. Comma, Mr. Rebel,
Due to the continuing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and Mr. Rudolph),economic uncertainty into 2021, and the annualresulting challenges in setting fiscal 2021 performance goals when comparing to fiscal 2020 expectations and actual performance, the Committee determined at the beginning of fiscal 2021 that it was in the best interest of the Company to establish goals for the full fiscal year for strategic goals and only for the first half (Q1 and Q2) of fiscal 2021 for financial goals; and to establish financial goals for the second half (Q3 and Q4) of fiscal 2021 after Q2 was completed, and the Company had a better read on the economic situation and the impact on its financial forecast for the balance of the fiscal year. The primary reasons our target goals for the second half of the fiscal year were lower than the first half were (1) we anticipated an increase in restaurant re-openings, (2) we were rolling-over unusually high sales driven by our drive-thru capability during the pandemic, and (3) our first half of the fiscal year represents seven accounting periods while the second half is six accounting periods.
The AIP performance metrics included: (1) Operating EPS, using the same calculation that ManagementEBIT, (2) System Same-Store Sales, and the investment community commonly use to assess the Company’s performance; and (2) Consolidated Restaurant Operating Margin (ROM),(3) Strategic Goals, weighted as described below. For the JIB President, Ms. Allen, and the Qdoba President, Mr. Guilbault, the goals included a combination of the Company Operating EPS goal, and specific goals for each of their respective brands.

follows:

Operating EBIT(1)
50%
System Same-Store Sales(2)
30%
Strategic Goals
20%
When setting fiscal 20172021 annual incentive goals, the Committee considered: (1) the Company’s fiscal 2017 operational planused a rigorous process to set challenging, yet reasonably attainable goals aimed at ensuring appropriate and budget, that included then-current

economic conditions, and potential events that could impact future sales and earnings levels; (2) a sensitivity analysiscompetitive levels of Company and brand performance resultspayout relative to the incentive targets; and (3) the advice of the Committee’s Consultant. performance achievement. The process included consideration of:

(1)
the Company’s fiscal 2021 operational plan and budget that included then-current economic conditions;
(2)
key Company initiatives to grow and strengthen the brand;
(3)
current and projected performance of the restaurant industry in general and companies within our Peer Group, and other potential internal and external events that could impact future sales and earnings levels;
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 51

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — VI. FISCAL 2021 COMPENSATION
(4)
a sensitivity analysis of performance results relative to the incentive targets; and
(5)
the advice of the Committee’s Consultant.
Based on this review, the Committee set goals based on key financial metrics and strategic metrics that it believed would increase stockholder value if achieved, with target and higher goals set at challenging, yet reasonable levels. The plan structure
Additionally, the Committee established the range of payout opportunity for the financial and relative weightsstrategic metrics: for
achievement of financial goals, there is no payout at threshold and the maximum payout is 200% of target payout (except for Mr. Harris with a maximum payout of 150% of target payout); and, for achievement of strategic goals, payout at threshold is 50% of target payout and the maximum payout is 150% of target payout. Incentive payouts for each financial goal are shown in the table below.

Brand Services Executives JIB/Qdoba Brand Executives

 

70%

 

 

 

Jack in the Box Inc. Operating EPS

 

 

 

30%

 

 

 

Jack in the Box Inc. Operating EPS

 

 

30%

 

 

 

Consolidated ROM

 

 

 

40%

 

 

 

JIB/Qdoba Brand Earnings from Operations

 

    

 

30%

 

 

 

JIB/Qdoba ROM

 

prorated between performance levels. For incentive payouts, strategic goals are not prorated between performance levels.

2017
2021 Performance Metrics
Why Goal Is Used

Operating EPS (diluted)EBIT1(1)

This is a primary measure of how well the Company is performing overall, and is a key driver of stockholder return over the long term. This metric excludes restructuring charges and gains and losses from refranchising.

Consolidated Restaurant Operating Margin (ROM)

Consolidated ROM measures how effectively the Company manages its business operations and costs, and is a key performance metric for alignment with our franchise operators, our franchising strategy, and our stockholders and potential investors.

JIB/Qdoba Brand Earnings from Operations

Brand Earnings from Operations

This is a key performance metric for measuring operational performanceperformance. In fiscal 2021, the metric excluded (a) net gains or losses from the sale of company-operated restaurants and/or the sale of the Company’s corporate office facility, (b) restructuring and/or other non-recurring charges, (c) any gain or loss associated with the Company’s corporate-owned life insurance policies (COLI), (d) net period benefit costs/credits or settlement gain/loss related to the Company’s pension and post-retirement health plans, and (e) discontinued operations.
System Same-Store Sales(2)
System same-store sales is a key metric to best measure how well our franchise and company restaurants that have been opened for more than one year are performing financially, both in growing top-line sales and revenues (through royalty income from our franchise restaurants). It is also the basis to measure our success relative to profitability, and is reportedour competitors in the footnotesindustry.
Strategic Goals:
 Be a Great Franchisor
 Brand Position and Strategy
 Ignite Development and Growth
Strategic goals are critical to ourthe Company achieving its business objectives to grow and strengthen the brand. Each of the goals is intended to improve the financial statementsand operational effectiveness of the Company over the long-term. At the beginning of fiscal 2021, pre-defined objective criteria were established for expectations of performance to attain threshold, target, and maximum, with the Committee reserving its discretion to assess qualitative components when determining performance achievement.
(1)
Operating EBIT is a non-GAAP measure, defined by the Company as Earnings from Operations by Segment. It includes allnet earnings for the specified brand — all revenue less costs — before interest expense, net and income taxes, where such costs include regional administrative costs, but excludes unallocated costs related to shared service functions (such as accounting/finance, information technology, human resources, audit services, legal, tax and treasury) as well as unallocated costs such asexcluding gains or losses on the sale of company operated restaurants, gain on the sale of our corporate office, restructuring costs, pension expense and share-based compensation.

JIB/Qdoba Restaurant Operating Margin (ROM)2

Brand ROM measures how effectively JIB and Qdoba manage their respective business operations and costs, and is a key performance metric that alignspostretirement expenses, net gains or losses associated with the interestsCompany’s company owned life insurance policies, and earnings or losses from discontinued operations. See Appendix A — Reconciliation of each brand’s franchise operators, as well as with our stockholders and potential investors.

1

As set forth in Note 2 in the Proxy Summary, Operating EPS is a non-GAAP measure. For a reconciliation of this measureNon-GAAP measurements to the most comparable GAAP measure, please refer to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K and accompanying press release filed November 29, 2017.

Results.
2
(2)

As set forth

System same-store sales represents changes in Note 1 in the Proxy Summary, restaurant operating marginsales at company and franchise restaurants open more than one year. Franchise sales represent sales at franchise restaurants and are revenues of our franchisees. We do not record franchise sales as revenues; however, our royalty revenues and percentage rent revenues are calculated based on a percentage of franchise sales. We believe system same-store sales information is useful to investors as it has a non-GAAP measure. For a reconciliation of this measure to the most comparable GAAP measure, please refer todirect effect on the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K and accompanying press release filed November 29, 2017.

profitability.

44    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


  CD&A — VI. FISCAL 2017 COMPENSATION  

Fiscal 20172021 Performance Results

The Company and Committee use a rigorous process to set challenging, yet reasonably attainable goals. This process includes (a) aligning annual goals with the fiscal year budget approved by the Board, (b) considering current and projected performance of the restaurant industry in general and companies within our peer group, (c) considering internal and external situations that could impact performance, and (d) ensuring appropriate and competitive levels ofoverall weighted payout relative to performance achievement.

Jack in the Box Inc. performance:The Company performed just above its minimum threshold goal set for fiscal 2017 Operating EPS ($3.77), but fell substantially short2021 goals was 143.3% of target performance ($4.65). The Company did not achievepayout for our CEO (maximum payout of 150% of target payout for both the minimum threshold goal setfinancial goals and the strategic goals), and 179.2% of target payout for Consolidated ROM (19.7%).

JIB performance:The JIB brand did not achieveour other NEOs (maximum payout of 200% of target payout for the minimum thresholdfinancial goals setand 150% of target payout for brand ROM (21.1%) or Earnings from Operations ($284.6 million).

Qdoba performance:The Qdoba brand did not achieve the minimum threshold goals set for Qdoba ROM (17.5%) or Earnings from Operations ($46.4 million)strategic goals).

LOGO

The charts below show actual financial performance relative to the target performance forgoal in the two corporate goalsfirst half (Q1 and Q2) and the two JIBsecond half (Q3 and Qdoba brand-specific goals, respectively.

LOGO

LOGO

Q4) of the fiscal year.
Financial Metrics/Goals – First Half of Fiscal Year (Q1 and Q2)

52 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — VI. FISCAL 2021 COMPENSATION
Financial Metrics/Goals – Second Half of Fiscal 2017Year (Q3 and Q4)

For the Strategic goals (weighted 20%), the Committee awarded a payout based on the level of attainment of pre-established expectations of performance to attain threshold, target, and maximum payout on each of the goals, as follows:
Be a Great Franchisor (Maximum Payout) – We attained maximum payout, resulting from the Company reaching a settlement with the Jack in the Box National Franchisee Association (“NFA”), the NFA’s nearly two-year old lawsuit with the Company, which has led to an enhanced and aligned relationship with our franchisees. We also established a new Leadership Advisory Council (“LAC”) that meets quarterly and is intended to improve communications with our franchisees. Additionally, our Franchise Relationship Survey (administered by the Franchise Relationship Institute), resulted in an overall satisfaction score improvement of 15.5 percentage points to 72%, representing a 27% improvement.
Brand Position and Strategy (Target Payout) – We attained target payout, resulting from the completion of a brand segmentation study, and the creation and launch of a new consumer-facing brand position and product/promotion campaign.
Ignite Development and Growth (Maximum Payout) – We attained maximum payout, resulting from the creation and launch of a franchise sales and marketing strategy that generated over 950 leads in fiscal 2021, in addition to 23 development agreements signed for a total of 111 restaurants.
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 53

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — VI. FISCAL 2021 COMPENSATION
Fiscal 2021 Strategic Goals
Strategic Goals (20%)
THRESHOLD
TARGET
MAXIMUM
Be a great
Franchisor
7.5%
Settlement of the NFA lawsuit, establishment of the Leadership Advisory Council and task forces comprised of franchisees.
Improve overall satisfaction score on the Franchise Relationship Survey by 5 pts, from 56% and 61%.
Improve overall satisfaction score on the Franchise Relationship Survey by 10 pts, from 56% to 66%.
Refine,
communicate, and
amplify our brand
position and
strategy
5.0%
Complete segmentation study, rewrite garget segments, brand positioning, and brand story, and obtain franchisee alignment.
Launch a consumer-facing brand message and tagline in a dedicated campaign, aligning remaining annual product/promotion creative to live within the same strategy and message. Support with $30M+ advertising spend to FY21.
Improve "Brand Recommend" metric in the brand tracker study by 2% from 69% to 71%.
Ignite development
and growth
7.5%
Create and launch a franchise sales and marketing strategy that generates 500 leads in FY21.
Sign franchise development agreements for 10 restaurants planned for FY22.
Approve 18 new sites (company or franchise) in FY21 for operating in FY22.
Fiscal 2021 Payouts

The 20172021 target and maximum annual incentive payout percentages for the NEOs, expressed as a percentage of annual base salary, are shown in the table below. The target potential payout percentages are set by position level, taking into account the competitive compensation competitive analysis described in CD&A Section III.a. and each executive’s role in the Company. There is no minimum amount of incentive payout guaranteed for the NEOs, but the maximum amount is capped at 2x target payout (which is 200% of salary for the CEO, and 150% of salary for the other NEOs). NEOs.
The incentive payouts as a percent of target incentive and as a percent of annual salaryto our fiscal 2021 NEOs are shown below.

   Potential Payout
(As Percent of Annual Salary)
    

Target

Incentive

   

Actual Payout

(As Percent of

Target Payout)

  

Actual Payout

(As Percent of

Annual Salary)

  

Actual Incentive

Payout

 
   Target           Max            

Mr. Comma (CEO)

  100%  200%    $900,000    8.7  8.7 $78,660 

Mr. Rebel (CFO)

    75%  150%    $423,000    8.9  6.7 $37,506 

Ms. Allen (JIB President)

    75%  150%    $386,250    3.8  2.9 $14,678 

Mr. Guilbault (Qdoba President) 

    75%  150%    $281,250    3.8  2.9 $10,688 

Mr. Rudolph (CLO)

    75%  150%    $384,000    8.9  6.7 $34,048 

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT45


 
Potential Payout
(% of Base Salary)
Actual
Incentive
Payout
(% of Target)
Actual
Incentive
Payout
(% of 2021
Base Salary)
Actual
Incentive
Payout
 
Target
Maximum(1)
Mr. Harris (CEO)
100%
150%
143.3%
143.3%
$1,182,606
Mr. Mullany (CFO)
75%
143%
179.2%
134.4%
$465,387(2)
Ms. Hooper (Former Interim PFO)
30%
57%
179.2%
53.8%
$153,920(2)
Mr. Ostrom (CMO)
60%
114%
179.2%
107.5%
$337,433(2)
Mr. Gordon (CSCO)
50%
95%
179.2%
89.6%
$335,090
Mr. Piano (CPO)
50%
95%
179.2%
89.6%
$159,205(2)
(*)

  CD&A — VI. FISCAL 2017 COMPENSATION  

Mr. Martin (Former CIO) separated employment with the Company during fiscal 2021 and was not eligible to receive payment under the AIP.

(1)
Reflects, for our CEO, the maximum payout for both financial and strategic goals of 150% of target payout; and for our other NEOs, the maximum payout for financial goals of 200% of target payout, and for strategic goals, the maximum payout of 150% of target payout.
(2)
For Messrs. Mullany Ostrom, and Piano, who were hired during fiscal 2021, the incentive payout is prorated based on hire date. Ms. Hooper’s actual payout was prorated using her salary for the period of time as Interim PFO and her salary for the period of time she resumed her current role of Vice President, Controller and Financial Reporting after our CFO was hired in January 2021.

c. Long-Term Incentive Compensation

In

For fiscal 2017,2021, the Committee awarded LTI program for all our Company NEOs was comprisedgrants of 34%equally-weighted PSUs and RSUs to support executive stock ownership and retention, and to drive achievement of long-term company performance goals. No stock options 33% performance shares (“PSUs”), and 33% restricted stock units (“RSUs”). were granted.
The Committee chose these forms of equity awards and weightings tobecause (a) provide options which align executive pay with the creation of value for our stockholders through stock price appreciation, (b) provide PSUs that directly link executive pay to achievement of longer-term Company financial and operational goals, and (c) provide time-vested(b) RSUs tovest over time and facilitate stock ownership and retention. All executives (Brand Services, JIB Brand, and Qdoba Brand) share the same PSU goals.

54 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — VI. FISCAL 2021 COMPENSATION
Each year, the Committee’s Consultant advises the Committee on the competitive LTI grant guidelinesvalues that, reflect approximately the median of Market TDC when combined with base salary and the target annual incentive.incentive, positions our executives’ TDC at the market median. For the fiscal 20172021 LTI grant, the Committee considereddetermined the equityamount of each NEO’s actual LTI grant guidelines,value, in its discretion, taking into consideration
the competitive LTI grant values, the Company’s overall performance, each brand’s performance for the prior fiscal year, recommendations from the CEO (except with regard to his own compensation), and input from the Consultant to determine the actual grant value for each NEO.its Consultant. The chart below illustrates our LTI structure and the key elements of each type of award forgranted to our NEOs and other executives for fiscal 2017.

2021.

LOGO

Vests at the end of the 3-fiscal year period based on goal achievement, and settled in stock; beginning fiscal 2016, after-tax net shares subject to stock holding requirement. Two performance metrics: ROIC from Operations (50%) - Measures efficient use of capital on adjusted ROIC from Operations for the third fiscal year of the performance period. Consolidated Systemwide Sales Growth (50%) - Three annual goals set at the beginning of each fiscal year; measures growth in sales of all company and franchise restaurants. 4-year vesting, 25% per year and settled in stock; after-tax net shares subject to stock holding requirement. 3-year vesting, 33% per year, and 7-year term. Exercise price is equal to the closing price of Jack in the Box Common Stock on the date of grant.

46    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


2021 Long-Term Incentive Awards
Award Type
Weight
Highlights
PSUs

Performance-Based
50%
• Cliff vest at the end of the 3-fiscal year performance period based on goal achievement

•  Settled in stock 
• 50% of after-tax net shares subject to stock holding requirement 
• Two performance metrics:
Adjusted ROIC from Operations (50%) - measures efficient use of capital for the third fiscal year of the performance period
Systemwide Sales (50%) - measures sales of all franchise and company-operated restaurants for the third fiscal year of the performance period
RSUs

  CD&A — VI. FISCAL 2016 COMPENSATION  Time-Vested

50%
• Vest 25% per year over four years
• Settled in stock
• 50% of after-tax net shares subject to stock holding requirement

*
Mr. Martin forfeited the annual equity award he received in fiscal 2021 upon his separation of employment with the Company in May 2021.

Performance Shares

(PSUs)

PSUs are granted annually and vest after three years based on achievement of performance metrics that are established for the three-fiscal year performance period (“Performance Period”). TheFor PSUs granted in fiscal 2021, the Committee sets specificestablished performance goals (including minimum, target, and maximum) either (a) at the beginning of the Performance Period or (b) annually at the beginningthreshold, target, and maximum levels of each fiscal year of the Performance Period, depending on the goal; in the latter case, the threshold performance goals set for the second and third years of the Performance Period generally may not be lower than the threshold set for the first year. The Committee believes that for some metrics, setting annual performance goals improves its visibility into the relative attainability and difficulty of the goals and, as a result, better aligns performance and payouts.achievement. Vesting ranges from 0% to 150% of the target number of shares granted; the threshold payout (50% of target) requires achieving an established minimum performance requirement (there is no payout if performance doesn’t meet the minimum requirement).

PSUs Granted in Fiscal 20172021: In November 2016,December 2020, the Committee granted PSU awards to our NEOs and executivesserving at the time for the fiscal 2017-2019three-fiscal year 2021-2023 Performance Period,Period. The PSU grants are based on two equally-weighted metrics: (a) adjusted ROIC from Operations (“ROIC”) and (b) Consolidated Systemwide Sales, Growth. Thewith the Committee setting the three-year ROIC performance goals were established forgoal and the full Performance Period and will be measured at the end of the third fiscal year (fiscal 2019), while the sales goals were set only for the first year (fiscal 2017) of the Performance Period. Goals for fiscal 2018 and 2019 will be setthree-year Systemwide Sales goal at the beginning of each respective year.

the three-year Performance Period.

These two metrics, Systemwide Sales and ROIC, support the critical drivers of our success: growingtop-line profitable sales profitably at both brands,in all franchise and company restaurants, and encouraging prudent deployment of capital to drive the business. For each metric, the Committee believes the goals set are appropriately challenging, yet reasonably attainable. The actual goals are not being disclosed before the end of the Performance Period because we believe such disclosure would be competitively harmful.

PSUs Vested in 20172021: PSUs granted in November 20142018 (based on the fiscal 2015-2017three-fiscal year 2019-2021 Performance
Period), vested and were payable in December 2017. Consistent with our pay for performance philosophy, the payout2021. The level of achievement was determined based on the two weighted metrics, ROIC and Systemwide Sales, as follows:
Systemwide Sales
The PSU payout level for Systemwide Sales was determined as the average of (a) the performance level attained in each fiscal year of the Performance PeriodPeriod. The threshold, target, and maximum Systemwide Sales goals were established at the beginning of each fiscal year. The threshold, target, and maximum goals were:
Fiscal 2019 — $3.466 billion, $3.566 billion, and $3.659 billion, respectively
Fiscal 2020 — $3.505 billion, $3.631 billion, and $3.719 billion, respectively
Fiscal 2021 — $3.673 billion, $3.933 billion, and $4.005 billion, respectively
Actual Systemwide Sales achievement was $3.505 billion for fiscal 2019, $3.673 billion for fiscal 2020, and $4.155 billion for fiscal 2021, resulting in an average payout of 111.9% for the Consolidated Systemwide Sales measure (weighted 50%) and (b)portion of the award.
ROIC
The PSU payout level for ROIC was determined as the performance level attained on the ROIC measure set at the beginning of the three-year Performance Period forin fiscal 2017,2021, the third year of the Performance Period (weighted 50%).ThePeriod. The threshold, target, and maximum goals weightingwere established at the beginning of the three-fiscal year Performance Period (in November 2018). The threshold,
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 55

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — VI. FISCAL 2021 COMPENSATION
target, and maximum goals were 16.3%, 22.5%, and 28.6%, respectively.
Actual ROIC achievement for fiscal 2021 was 46.8%, exceeding the maximum goal and resulting in a payout are shown on the chart below. The achievement level onof 150% the ROIC from Operations goal was substantially aboveportion of the target of 15.0% (or 146.6% of target). Achievement onaward.
PSU Vesting and Payout for Fiscal 2021
Together, the Consolidated Systemwide Sales goal exceeded the maximum in fiscal 2015, and was above threshold but below target in each of fiscal 2016 and 2017 (resulting in an average achievement level of 90.7% on the sales goals). Together, thisROIC performance outcomes resulted in a weighted payout of 118.6%131.0% of the target number of PSUs granted to NEOs employed for the full Performance Period.
Equity Awards for New Executive Officers
The Committee approved equity awards for three NEOs to induce each to join the Company in fiscal 2021 and to facilitate stock ownership in the Company prior to the next annual grant in fiscal 2022, as described below, with each grant and amount determined in consultation with the Committee’s Consultant:
To new CFO, Mr. Mullany, who joined the Company in January 2021, the Committee approved a one-time new hire grant of RSUs equal to $250,000 at grant, and an annual equity grant under our LTI program for fiscal 2021 equal to $600,000 at grant (PSUs and RSUs, weighted equally), each with the number of shares determined using a 60-day average closing price of our Common Stock on
and prior to the date of grant. The RSUs vest 25% per year over four years and PSUs cliff-vest at the end of the NEOs.

3-fiscal year Performance Period based on goal achievement; and, upon vesting of PSUs and RSUs, 50% of the after-tax net shares are subject to our stock holding requirement.

Fiscal 2015-2017 PSU GoalsTo new CMO, Mr. Ostrom, who joined the Company in February 2021, the Committee approved an annual equity grant under our LTI program for fiscal 2021 equal to $600,000 at grant (PSUs and RSUs, weighted equally), with the number of shares determined using a 60-day average closing price of our Common Stock on and prior to the date of grant. The RSUs vest 25% per year over four years and PSUs cliff-vest at the end of the 3-fiscal year Performance

Performance
Period
          Goal  

FY15

Actual

   

FY16

Actual

   

FY17

Actual

 
  Approved Measures  Weight  Threshold  Target  Maximum      

2015-2017

 

  

ROIC from Operations (at FYE2017)

 

  50%

 

  13.2%

 

  15.0%

 

  17.9%

 

             

 

17.7%

 

 

 

2015

  Consolidated Systemwide Sales  50%  $3.926  $4.018  $4.135  $4.149           

2016

  (All Restaurants) ($ in billions)    $4.201  $4.502  $4.610    $4.330    

2017

        $4.288  $4.502  $4.581            $4.291 

Period based on goal achievement; and, upon vesting of PSUs and RSUs, 50% of the after-tax net shares are subject to our stock holding requirement.

To new CPO, Mr. Piano, who joined the Company in April 2021, the Committee approved a one-time new hire grant of RSUs equal to $225,000 at grant, with the number of shares determined using a 60-day average closing price of our Common Stock on and prior to the date of grant. The RSUs vest 25% per year over four years, and upon vesting, 50% of the after-tax net shares are subject to our stock holding requirement.
Each of the equity awards is detailed in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table shows the LTI awards to each of our NEOs in fiscal 2017.

table.

d. Cash Perquisite Allowance

Executives receive an annual

Prior to fiscal 2021 our executive compensation program provided a cash perquisite allowance to our executive officers, except for our CEO upon his commencement of employment in June 2020. The program was intended to contributeprovide assistance to executives, in the executive’samount the Committee had determined was appropriate, for expenses for financial planning, and the executive’srelated to use of their personal automobile and cell phone for business purposes. Thepurposes, and for financial planning. However, the executive could choose to use the perquisite allowance isin any manner
they chose, and the Company did not require the executive to disclose how it was used. During fiscal 2021, Messrs. Gordon and Martin were the only NEOs who received the allowance, which was paid bi-weekly and was taxable to each executive, with no tax gross-up. Effective fiscal 2022, the cash perquisite allowance will be eliminated for all executive officers. During Ms. Hooper’s service as Interim PFO, she continued to receive an annual car allowance provided in her role as Vice President, Controller and the Company does not provide a related taxgross-up.

Financial Reporting.
Name  Allowance 

Mr. Comma (CEO)

  $66,500 

Mr. Rebel (CFO)

  $52,000 

Ms. Allen (JIB President)

  $52,000 

Mr. Guilbault (Qdoba President)

  $52,000 

Mr. Rudolph (CLO)

  $52,000 

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT47


56 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — VII. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION INFORMATION

VII. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION INFORMATION


a. Executive Stock Ownership and Holding Requirements

Our senior vice presidents and higher, including our NEOs,executive officers are subject to stock ownership guidelines. The guidelinesrequirements that are intended to assure that these executives maintainencourage them to have a meaningful long-term financial stake in the Company in order to promote a long-term perspective in managing the business, and to align their long-term financial interests with those of our stockholders. Our stock ownership guidelinesThe requirements consist of (1) an ownership requirement set asowning shares of common stock with a value equal to a multiple of base salary and (2) holding 50% of after-tax net shares resulting from the vesting of PSUs and RSUs until (a) the executive’s termination of service for awards granted prior to October 2021 or (b) the executive meets their multiple of base salary ownership requirement for awards granted in or after October 2021, a change made to better align our holding requirement with prevailing market practice. Each executive officer generally has a five year “transition period” from becoming subject to the requirements to achieve the multiple of base salary ownership requirement.

1.Stock Ownership GuidelineRequirement

Position
Minimum Ownership
(base salary multiple)
Position
CEO
Minimum Ownership
(multiple of base salary)
6.0x

Chairman and CEO

5.0x

Executive Vice President

3.0x

JIB and Qdoba Brand Presidents

3.0x

Senior Vice President

1.5x

2.Holding RequirementsRequirement

Beginning in fiscal 2014 for RSU grants and in fiscal 2016 for PSU grants, executives

As of October 2021, executive officers are required to hold until termination50% of service 50% ofafter-tax net shares resulting from the vesting of RSUs and PSUs. (For shares resulting from RSU grants prior to fiscal 2014, executives who had not yet met their ownership guideline are required to hold 100%PSUs until the multiple of net shares.)

Prior to 2011, the executive stock ownership program consisted ofone-time grants of restricted stock units that executives must hold until termination of service with the Company.

base salary requirement is met.

NEO Stock Ownership

Each year the Committee reviews our NEOs’ stock ownership relative to their respective requirement, with new executives who first become subject to their requirement expected to meet their ownership requirement within five years from the date they became subject to the requirement. As ofFor our NEOs currently serving at the end of fiscal 2017, all of our NEOs2021, Mr. Gordon has met theirhis stock ownership requirement except Ms. Allen, who was hired in October 2014 and is stillthe other NEOs, including our CEO, are progressing towards meeting their requirement within herthe transition period for compliance.

Name  Shares
Directly
Held
   Restricted
Stock/
Unvested
Shares  (1)
   Total
Shares
   Value at 10/01/17
@ $101.92
   

Stock
Ownership

Requirement
(000s)

   Meets
Requirement
 

Mr. Comma (CEO)

   46,914    127,473    174,387   $17,773,523   $4,500,000    Yes 

Mr. Rebel (CFO)

   35,240    73,674    108,914   $11,100,515   $1,692,000    Yes 

Ms. Allen (JIB President)

   2,932    8,577    11,509   $1,172,997   $1,545,000    No 

Mr. Guilbault (Qdoba President)

   13,203    3,986    17,189   $1,751,903   $1,125,000    Yes 

Mr. Rudolph (CLO)

   23,612    68,741    92,353   $9,412,618   $1,536,000    Yes 
(1)

This column includes restricted shares and unvested RSUs; and for Mr. Comma, also includes deferred performance vested restricted stock. Unvested PSUs and unvested or unexercised options do not count toward meeting ownership guidelines.

b. Executive Benefits

Our NEOs and other executivesexecutive officers receive the same benefits as those generally available to other employees in the Company. Both Company-subsidized and voluntary benefit programs are provided and include medical, dental, vision, life insurance,

insurance, and disability coverage. Additionally, the Company provides each NEOexecutive officers, including our NEOs, with an enhanced level of employer-paid term life insurance with a value for each NEO of $770,000.

48    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


  CD&A — VII. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION INFORMATION  

c. Retirement Plans

The Company’s retirement plans are designed to provide our employees, including our NEOs and other executives, with some retirement income security. These plans reward for service and provide an additional incentive for our employees to build long-term careers at Jack in the Box.

Defined Benefit Pension Plan (“Retirement Plan”). Four NEOs and all other All employees hired before 2011 (including one NEO currently serving, and one former NEO serving as Interim PFO for a portion of fiscal 2021) are participants in atax-qualified defined benefit pension plan. This plan was closed to new employees hired on or after January 1, 2011, and was “sunset” on December 31, 2015. This means that participants no longer accrue additional benefits based on additional pay and service as of that date. Participants may begin receiving their accrued benefit on or after retirement.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”). One of our NEOs and three other Company executives are participants in the SERP. Effective January 1, 2007, the SERP was closed to new participants. The SERP is unfunded and not qualified for tax purposes. The SERP was established in 1990 to address IRC limitations on pension benefits that could be accrued under our

tax-qualified pension plan.

Qualified 401(k) Plan (“401(k) Plan”).Effective January 1, 2016, our NEOs became eligible to defer base salary and annual incentive compensation through the Company’s The 401(k) Plan is a qualified defined contribution plan the 401(k) Plan. (Prior to that time, our NEOs and other highly compensated employees were excluded from participating.) The 401(k) Plan is available to all Company employees and provides to all employeesemployees. Employees who participate in the plan by deferringcan defer eligible compensation and receive a

Company matching contribution equal toof 100% of the first four percent4% of an employee’s deferred compensation, deferred, with immediate vesting.

All of our NEOs participated in the 401(k) Plan during fiscal 2021.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (“EDCP”). In light of IRC limits imposed on the 401(k) Plan, we sponsor the EDCP Plan into whichwhereby our NEOsexecutive officers and other highly compensated employees may also defer up to 50% of their base salary and up to 85% of their annual incentive compensation. In coordination with the 401(k) Plan changes that took effect January 1, 2016, the EDCP Company matching contribution (previously 100% of the first three percent of compensation deferred) was replaced with a “restoration matching contribution.” This means the Company will match up to the full four percent potential matching contribution forFor participants whose compensation or deferrals to the 401(k) Plan (and related Company matching contributions) are limited due to the IRC limits applicable to the 401(k) Plan.Plan, the Company provides a “restoration matching contribution” to the EDCP of up to 4% of compensation deferred (as compensation is defined in the 401(k) Plan). A participant must be employed on the last day of the calendar year to receive the restoration matching contribution, which is then 100% vested. Company matching contributions made prior to January 1, 2016 vested at a rate of 25% per year (such that the match fully vests after completion of four full years of service with the Company). Participants choose from an array of investment options,

JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 57

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — VII. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION INFORMATION
and their accounts are credited based upon the performance of the investment options. These obligations under the EDCP represent an unsecured claim against the
Company.

Enhanced EDCP. Due to Two NEOs currently serving, and one former NEO serving as Interim PFO for a portion of fiscal 2021 participated in the closure of the SERP in 2007, employees hired or promoted into a Corporate Vice President position between January 1, 2007 and May 7, 2015 receive a supplemental contribution to their EDCP account of four percent of base salary and annual incentive each year for up to ten years. During 2017, four of our NEOs received the enhanced EDCP.

during 2021.

d. Prohibition of Pledging and Hedging Transactions

The Company prohibits directors and Section 16 officers from engaging in certain derivative transactions in Company stock that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of equity securities granted as compensation to, or held directly or indirectly by, the employee or director, including:

Trading in “puts”, “calls”, or other derivative vehicles involving the Company’s securities (often referred to as hedging transactions);

Engaging inzero-cost collars, forward sales contracts or other hedging transactions in Company securities;

Holding Company securities in margin accounts; or

Pledging Company securities.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT49


  CD&A — VII. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION INFORMATION  

e. Executive Compensation Recovery (“Clawback”) Policy

The Company’s compensation recovery policy provides that in the event Jack in the Box Inc. materially restates all or a portion of its financial statements due to fraud or intentional misconduct, either committed by a Corporate Officer or knowingly permitted by a Corporate Officer, the Committee may take action to recover incentive cash compensation and performance-based equity awards that were based on the achievement of financial results that were subsequently restated. For purposes of this policy, a Corporate Officer is defined as an employee with the title of Corporate Vice President or above, and includes the JIB President and Qdoba President, as well as former Corporate Officers who were employed by the Company at the time of any fraud or intentional misconduct.

Executive compensation subject to recovery and/or cancellation may include:

i)

Annual incentive or incentive cash compensation paid to the Corporate Officer, plus a reasonable rate of interest,

ii)

Economic gains realized from the sale of shares awarded under a performance-based equity plan, and

iii)

Restricted stock or units (PSUs, RSUs), deferred stock awards or units, and outstanding stock options to the extent vesting of such awards is performance-based.

The Committee has the sole discretion to determine what action to take in the event of a restatement, including soliciting recommendations from the Audit Committee and the full Board and retaining outside advisors to assist in making its determinations. Any actions taken by the Committee would be independent of consequences imposed by law enforcement agencies, regulators or other authorities.

Since November 2015, all PSU grant agreements contain specific terms providing that the award is subject to recoupment in accordance with any clawback policy that the Company adopts pursuant to the listing standards of any national securities exchange or association on which the Company’s securities are listed or as is otherwise required by the Dodd-Frank Act or other applicable law. The Committee will continue to review potential changes to its policies, as appropriate in light of the Dodd-Frank Act final regulations.

f. Termination of Service

None of the 2017 NEOs have employment agreements that provide for benefits upon termination of service, except (a) in the event of a change in control (“CIC”) (including for Mr. Guilbault, a change in control of the Qdoba business) as described in the “Compensation and Benefits Assurance Agreements discussion in the next section; and (b) in the case of Ms. Allen, whose employment offer letter provides for her to receive one year base salary in the event she is terminated without cause.

When ana NEO terminates employment with the Company, the NEO will receive amounts according to the specific terms and provisions of each compensation plan or benefit plan in which he or she participates. Such amounts may include:

Amounts contributed to and distributed under the Company’s qualified andnon-qualified deferred compensation plans (subject to the specific terms and requirements of IRC Section 409A).

Under the Company’s equity incentive plan and standard equity agreements, upon a CIC: (a) vesting of PSUs based on actual levels achieved for completed performance

periods and target level for incomplete periods, and (b) accelerated vesting of RSUs and options only upon both a qualified CIC and qualifying termination, as described in the “Compensation & Benefits Assurance Agreements” section below.

Amounts accrued and vested in the Company’s pension plansplan (Retirement Plan for four NEOs; plus the SERP for Mr. Rebel only)two NEOs (Mr. Gordon and Ms. Hooper).

If termination is after the end of the fiscal year but before payment, the annual cash incentive award, subject to the Company’s achievement of performance goals.

58 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — VII. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION INFORMATION

If eligible to retire under a Company-sponsored retirement plan, in addition to the above, and consistent with the terms of our standard equity agreement, a corporate officerCorporate Officers (including all NEOs) isare entitled to the following:

Accelerated vesting of options equal to 5% additional vesting for each full year of service with the Company.

Prorated vesting of PSUs and full vesting of time-vested RSUs inIn accordance with the vesting schedule of each award.

award, prorated vesting of PSUs; and full vesting of time-vested RSUs.

A prorated annual cash incentive award based on the number of full reporting periods worked in the fiscal year before retirement, subject to the Company’s eligibility requirements and achievement of performance goals.

If ana NEO dies while employed by the Company, under the terms of the respective stock award agreements, all outstanding options and stock awards will become 100% vested on the date of his or her death (in the case of PSUs, subject to the number of periods completed during the performance period and actual performance achieved).

The values of additional potential payments to the NEOs are provided in the section entitled “Potential Payments Onon Termination of Employment or Change in Control” of this Proxy Statement.

50    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


Severance Plan for Executive Officers
In February 2020, the Committee adopted the Severance Plan for Executive Officers (the “Executive Severance Plan”) effective March 9, 2020, that provides severance benefits to the Company’s CEO and other executive officers, in the event of an involuntary termination without Cause that constitutes a Qualifying Termination (as defined in the Executive Severance Plan, a “Non-CIC Qualifying Termination”) either before, or more than 24 months after, a change in control of the Company.
The Executive Severance Plan provides for certain cash severance and other benefit payments contingent on the executive timely executing an effective general release of claims against the Company as described in more detail in the section entitled “Potential Payments on Termination of Employment or Change in Control” of this Proxy Statement.
The Committee adopted the Executive Severance Plan to provide benefits that they felt were consistent with market practices and that would provide reasonable protection to our executives and serve as an important retention tool.
In addition to the Executive Severance Plan, the 2021 NEOs have executed change in control (“CIC”) agreements that provide for benefits upon termination of service in the event of CIC as described in the “Compensation and Benefits Assurance Agreements” discussion in the next section.
Severance Arrangement with Mr. Martin
The Committee approved severance benefits payable to Mr. Martin in connection with his separation of service with the Company in May 2021, which consisted of a cash payment under the terms of the Company’s Executive Severance Plan for Executive Officers, as described in the “Potential Payments on Termination of Employment or Change in Control” section. The Committee determined these severance benefits were appropriate in connection with our CEO’s restructuring of the executive leadership team.
Standard Severance Program for Ms. Hooper
As a vice president, Ms. Hooper is not eligible for benefits under the Executive Severance Plan, however she is eligible for severance benefits under the Company’s standard severance program for management and staff. The plan provides that in the event of an involuntary termination without Cause, vice presidents may receive two weeks cash severance per year of service up to a maximum of 52 weeks; and if enrolled in the Company’s medical plans at the time of termination, cash severance to assist with COBRA premiums, equal to a fixed amount for every 4 weeks of severance.
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 59

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — VII. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION INFORMATION

g. Compensation & Benefits Assurance (Change in Control) Agreements

The Committee believes that Compensation & Benefits Assurance Agreements (otherwise known as a Change in Control or “CIC” Agreements) benefit stockholders by providing an important incentive to senior executivesexecutive officers to remain focused on running the business in the case of a pending or actual CIC event. Accordingly, eachWe have entered into CIC Agreements with all of our NEOs, other than Ms. Hooper, provided that Mr. Martin, who left during fiscal 2021, ceased to be eligible for benefits under the NEOs and seven other officers haveCIC Agreements as a result of his departure.
Each CIC Agreement providingprovides for compensation in the form of a lump sum payment and other benefits in the event of a qualifying termination within 24 months offollowing the effective date of the CIC of the Company (a “double-trigger” agreement).

In 2009, in line with market practices, The Company does not provide a tax gross-up on any provisions of the Committee determined not to enter into any future compensatory agreements with executives that obligate the Company to provide taxgross-up payments intended to offset the cost of excise taxes imposed on “excess parachute payments.” Accordingly, no CIC Agreements entered into since 2009 includegross-up provisions. One grandfathered CIC Agreement, entered into with our CFO prior to 2009, was still in effect at fiscalyear-end, and includes agross-up provision. The CFO has announced his plan to retire in fiscal 2018.

Agreement.

The Company’s current form CIC agreementAgreement includes a “bestafter-tax” provision where benefits would be reduced only if doing so would result in a betterafter-tax economic position for the affected executive. Under this provision, there are nogross-ups payable; theThe executive is solely responsible for payment of any excise taxes and all other applicable federal, state, and local income and employment taxes. The Committee plans to continue to monitor the costs and appropriate terms and conditions of CIC Agreements in the future.

In fiscal 2017, in connection with the Company’s evaluation of strategic alternatives with respect to Qdoba, the Company entered into a CIC agreement with the Qdoba Brand President that would be triggered upon his termination following a separation of the Qdoba business.

A detailed discussion of the provisions of the CIC Agreements and associated monetary values is provided in thesub-section following the compensation tables entitledCompensation & Benefits Assurance Agreements.

h. Tax and Accounting Information

Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)

The Committee and its Consultant consider the IRC Section 162(m) implications of all compensation decisions for our NEOs and other executives. Section 162(m) places a $1 million limit on the amount of compensation that the Company can deduct in any one taxable year for certain NEOs.covered employees. Historically, certain performance-based paycompensation has been excluded from this limit. However, the performance-based paycompensation exemption has been repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, such that compensation paid to certain NEOscovered employees in excess of $1 million per taxable year will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017.

For the reasons discussed earlier, our2017 (the “Section 162(m) Transition Relief”).

Our compensation programs have generallyhistorically been designed to provide the largestfor a substantial portion of an executive’s compensation to be delivered through programs generally intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), including our annual performance incentive plan and long-term incentive plan in the form of stock options and performance shares.options. However, corporate objectives may not necessarily align withany such compensation will no longer qualify for the requirements of Section 162(m). Accordingly, the Committee may grant awards or enter intoperformance-based compensation arrangements under which payments are not deductibleexemption under Section 162(m). For example, restricted stock awards are not considered performance-based under unless it qualifies for the Section 162(m) Transition Relief and accordingly, are subject to the $1 million deductibility limit. Despitedespite the Committee’s efforts to structure certain compensation into qualify for a manner intended to be exempt from Section 162(m) and therefore not subject to itsmaximum allowable tax deduction, limit, because of ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m) and the regulations issued

thereunder, including the uncertain scope of the transition relief under the legislation repealing the performance-based exemption from the deduction limit, no assurance can be given that such compensation intended to satisfywill be eligible for the requirements for exemption from the $1 million deductibility limit imposed by the Section 162(m) in fact will.. Further, the Committee may modify compensation that was initially intended to be exempt from the $1 million deductibility

limit under Section 162(m) if it determines that such modifications are consistent with our business needs.

The Committee will continue to monitor the applicability of Section 162(m) to the Company’s ongoing compensation arrangements.

Internal Revenue Code Section 409A

Under IRC Section 409A, amounts deferred by an employee under anon-qualified deferred compensation plan (such as the SERP and EDCP) may be included in gross income when deferred and be subject to a 20% additional federal tax, unless the plan complies with certain requirements related to the timing of deferral election and distribution decisions.

The Company administers the SERP and EDCP intending to comply with Section 409A. The Company intends that its stock options are exempt from Section 409A.

Expensing of Stock and Option Awards

The Company accounts for compensation expense associated with stock and option awards in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) authoritative guidance on stock compensation, and it uses a Black Scholes valuation model to determine the “fair value” of our stock options at grant. For further details regarding the accounting for the compensation expense associated with stock and option awards, refer to Note 12,Share-Based13, Share-Based Employee Compensationin the Company’s 20172020 Annual Report on Form10-K.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT51


60 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CD&A — VIII. CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE
VIII. CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE
Under SEC rules, we are required to calculate and disclose the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the annual total compensation of our median compensated employee. This ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in accordance with applicable SEC rules.
Below is: (i) the fiscal 2021 annual total compensation of our CEO, (ii) the fiscal 2021 annual total compensation of our median employee, and (iii) the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to that of our median employee.
CEO PAY RATIO

CEO Annual Total Compensation(1)
$4,709,511 
Median Employee Annual Total Compensation
$19,128 
CEO to Median Employee Pay Ratio
246.2 
(1)
As set forth in the fiscal 2021 Summary Compensation Table.
Methodology
The majority of our employee population consists of hourly part-time restaurant employees for which we provide work schedule flexibility to accommodate individual personal schedules. For fiscal 2021, we used the same median employee identified in fiscal 2019, which was determined based on gross base wages and target incentive potential (“total cash compensation”) for the twelve-month period ending September 29, 2019 for all full-time and part-time employees employed on such date. We did not annualize pay for employees employed for less than the full fiscal year.
Our median employee is a restaurant Team Member who worked an average of 29.5 hours per week in fiscal 2021. We used the same methodology to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee for the twelve-month period ending October 3, 2021 as we used for our NEOs, as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 2021.
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 61

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Jack in the Box Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent members of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities regarding compensation matters and is responsible under its charter for determining the compensation of the Executive Officers. This includes reviewing all components of pay for our CEO and the other NEOs. The Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement with its Consultant, with Management and with the Board. Based on this review and discussion, the Committee, on behalf of the Board, has authorized that this Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement for fiscal 2017,2021, which ended on October 1, 2017.

3, 2021.

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

John T. Wyatt,

Michael W. Murphy, Chair


David L. Goebel


Sharon P. John

Madeleine A. Kleiner

52    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


62 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION RISK ANALYSIS

COMPENSATION RISK ANALYSIS

The Committee has engaged in a thorough risk analysis of our compensation plans, programs, policies, and practices for all employees. This includes advice from the Committee’s independent Consultant regarding executive programs, and a detailed report, prepared by a Company Internal Compensation Risk Committee, describing the risk mitigation characteristics of the Company’s annual and long-term incentive programs. For the following reasons, the Committee believes that the design of our compensation programs, the governance of our programs, and our risk oversight process guard against imprudent risk taking that could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Compensation Program Design Protections


Our base pay programs consist of competitive salaries that provide a fixed level of income on a regular basis. This mitigates incentives on the part of our executives and employees to take unnecessary or imprudent risks.

The Board approves the Company’s strategic plan, capital budget, and long-term financial and operational plans that serve as the basis for setting short and long-term incentive goals. Goals are intended to drive stockholder value and are set relative to the approved budget, historical and future expected performance, and a reasonable amount of stretch so that they do not encourage imprudent risk taking.

Our annual incentive programs provide variable pay opportunities for certain position levels based on achievement of multiple annual performance goals including both financial, operational, and, for some years, strategic goals. Goals are set at reasonable levels and payouts are managed as a percentage of pay.

The maximum awards that may be paid to executive officers under the annual and long-term incentive programs are capped, and the Committee retains the discretion to reduce payouts under the plans.

The largest amount of executive incentive compensation opportunity is generally tied to long-term incentive compensation that emphasizes sustained Company performance over time. This reduces incentive for executives and other employees to take risks that might increase short-term compensation at the expense of longer termlonger-term Company results.

Equity awards have multi-year vesting, and RSU and PSU awards for executives have holding requirements until termination of service. This aligns the long-term interests of our NEOs and executives with those of our stockholders and discourages taking short-term risks at the expense of longer-term performance.

Structural Governance Protections


The Committee has adopted a clawback/compensation recovery policy that allows the Committee to take action to recover both cash compensation and performance-based equity awards for all NEOs and executives in the event of a material restatement based ondue to fraud or intentional misconduct.

The Company has strong internal controls over the measurement and calculation of performance goals designed to keep them from being susceptible to manipulation.

Company policy also:

Prohibits directors and executive officers from engaging in hedging transactions involving our stock, which prevents executives from insulating themselves from poor stock performance by betting against our success;

Prohibits directors and officers from pledging Company stock or holding Company stock in margin accounts. This reduces the risk that executives might create incentives to focus on short-term performance at the expense of long-term performance; and

Has a formal ethics code of conduct and an ethics helpline and provides ethics training and communications to employees. The ethics program is intended to reinforce a culture of integrity.

The Company also has a Compensation Risk Committee that includes functional experts tasked specifically with evaluating potential unintended or unforeseen consequences of our compensation programs and their component parts.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT53


JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 63

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) summarizes the total compensation of our NEOs for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2017,3, 2021, and the prior two fiscal years to the extent required under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules.

Summary Compensation Table

Name &

Principal Position

 

Fiscal

Year

  Salary(1)  Bonus  

Stock

Awards(3)

  

Option

Awards(4)

  

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation (5)

  

Change in

Pension

Value &

NQDC

Earnings (6)

  

All

Other

Comp (7)

  Total 

Mr. Comma

  2017  $900,000  $0  $2,796,728  $858,264  $78,660  $0  $114,281  $4,747,933 

Chairman and CEO

  2016  $909,615  $0  $5,963,780  $703,380  $1,506,240  $97,294  $260,745  $9,441,054 
   2015  $842,308  $0  $2,631,761  $1,013,216  $1,632,000  $36,357  $239,702  $6,395,344 

Mr. Rebel

  2017  $564,000  $0  $618,362  $182,381  $37,506  $687,915  $176,235  $2,266,399 

Executive Vice President,

  2016  $573,615  $0  $648,609  $170,813  $708,243  $1,620,465  $179,577  $3,901,322 

Chief Financial Officer

  2015  $553,539  $0  $925,277  $283,110  $801,335  $1,256,873  $155,541  $3,975,675 

Ms. Allen

  2017  $515,000  $0  $593,882  $182,381  $14,678  $0  $94,635  $1,400,576 

JIB President

  2016  $522,596  $0  $489,171  $180,869  $644,651  $0  $146,770  $1,984,057 
   2015  $461,538  $200,000 (2)  $614,752  $171,581  $683,654  $0  $291,636  $2,423,161 

Mr. Guilbault

Qdoba President

  2017  $375,000  $0  $352,383  $116,922  $10,688  $577  $97,831  $953,401 

Mr. Rudolph

  2017  $512,000  $0  $609,155  $182,381  $34,048  $2,578  $149,063  $1,489,225 

Executive Vice President,

  2016  $520,308  $0  $612,256  $170,813  $642,944  $64,290  $186,302  $2,196,913 
Chief Legal and Risk Officer
& Secretary
  2015  $499,385  $0  $731,084  $246,271  $723,508  $48,499  $171,248  $2,419,995 

Name &
Principal Position
Fiscal
Year
Salary(1)
Bonus(2)
Stock
Awards(3)
Option
Awards(4)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(5)
Change in
Pension
Value &
NQDC
Earnings(6)
All
Other
Comp(7)
Total
Mr. Harris
CEO
2021
$840,865
$0
$2,634,444
$0
$1,182,606
$0
$51,596
$4,709,511
2020
$237,981
$200,000
$598,150
$0
$325,000
$0
$8,809
$1,369,940
Mr. Mullany(8)
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
2021
$355,769
$150,000
$840,484
$0
$465,387
$0
$128,622
$1,940,262
Ms. Hooper(9)
Vice President, Controller and
Financial Reporting (Former
Interim Principal Financial Officer)
2021
$288,945
$0
$106,387
$0
$153,920
$16,557
$29,406
$595,215
2020
$254,375
$0
$45,446
$0
$106,995
$103,562
$25,324
$535,702
Mr. Ostrom(10)
Executive Vice President, Chief
Marketing Officer
2021
$323,077
$200,000
$595,202
$0
$337,433
$0
$253,748
$1,709,460
Mr. Gordon(11)
Senior Vice President
Chief Supply Chain Officer
2021
$379,712
$0
$228,865
$0
$335,090
$9,995
$52,208
$1,005,870
2020
$361,519
$0
$170,758
$70,053
$253,737
$44,341
$48,748
$949,156
Mr. Piano(12)
Senior Vice President
Chief People Officer
2021
$185,769
$200,000
$246,337
$0
$159,205
$0
$203,177
$994,488
Mr. Martin(13)
(Former) Senior Vice President
Chief Information Officer
2021
$223,885
$0
$228,865
$0
$0
$0
$613,681
$1,066,431
2020
$354,519
$0
$141,887
$56,034
$248,844
$0
$49,185
$850,469
(1)

This column showsReflects the base salary earned during the fiscal year, including any amounts deferred by the NEOs ininto the Company’s deferred compensation plans, the 401(k) and/or the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (EDCP). The amounts for 2016fiscal 2021 reflect one additional week of compensation due to the Company’s53-week fiscal year.

(2)

Ms. Allen joinedMessrs. Mullany, Ostrom and Piano received a one-time new hire bonus which was paid upon commencing employment with the Company during fiscal 2015 and this amount representsis required to be repaid in the newevent of resignation or termination with Cause within one year from hire cash bonus she received.

date.
(3)

This column showsReflects the aggregate grant date fair value of the PSUs and RSUs granted during the applicable fiscal year, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (“ASC 718”) based on the assumptions and methodologies set forth in the Company’s 20172021 Annual Report on Form10-K (Note 12,13, Share-Based Employee Compensation). The 2016 amount for Mr. Comma also includes his specialone-time retention RSU award which vests 50% four years after the date of grant, and the remaining 50% five years after grant. The 2015 amount for Ms. Allen also includes hernew-hire grant of 4,207 RSUs, which vest 33% per year over three years on each anniversary of the grant.

PSU awards cliff vest after three years and best based on the Company’s performance for the three-fiscal year performance period. The performance metrics and goals are established at the beginning of the three-year performance period when the grant is made. For Messrs. Gordon and Martin, a portion of their award includes one year of the three-fiscal year performance period, for which the Committee established goals at the beginning of fiscal 2021.The amounts for each year include the sum of the grant date fair values under ASC 718 for current year PSU grants and past year PSU grants, for which performance metrics were set in that year, at target values. Assuming the maximum level of performance achievement (150% of target), the PSU total values for each NEO who received a PSU award in 2021, including Mr. Martin, Former NEO in 2021 are, respectively: Mr. Harris, $1,928,207; Mr. Mullany, $434,090; Mr. Ostrom, $422,491; Mr. Gordon, $181,382; and Mr. Martin, $181,382.
(4)

PSU awards, which cliff vest after three years vest based on our performance during a three-fiscal year period. The performance metrics are established at the beginning of the three-year period when the grant is made; the specific performance goals for all or a portion of the award are reviewed and set by the Committee (a) for the full three-year performance period at the time of grant for some performance metrics, and (b) for aone-year period at the beginning of each fiscal year for other performance metrics. The amounts for each year include the sum of the grant date fair values under ASC 718 for current year PSU grants and past year PSU grants, for which performance metrics were set in that year, at target values. Assuming the maximum level of performance achievement (150% of target), the PSU total values for each NEO in 2017 are, respectively: Mr. Comma, $2,096,161; Mr. Rebel, $481,649; Ms. Allen, $444,929; Mr. Guilbault, $242,679 and Mr. Rudolph, $467,838.

(4)

This column showsReflects the grant date fair values of stock options granted during the applicable fiscal year in accordance with ASC 718. The grant date fair values have been determined based on the assumptions and methodologies set forth in the Company’s 20172021 Annual Report on Form10-K (Note 12,13, Share-Based Employee Compensation).

(5)

This column shows

Reflects the annual incentive awards earned by each NEO based on achievement of pre-established performance goals under theour annual incentive planprogram, and is prorated if the NEO was not employed by the Company for executives.the full fiscal year. Performance achievement is approved by the Committee following the end of the fiscal year. Annual incentive payments are made following Committee approval of performance achievement and reported in the SCT in the fiscal year for which the incentive is earned.

(6)

This column showsReflects the change in the estimated present value of each NEO’s accumulated benefit under (a) the qualified pension plan (the “Retirement Plan”) for Messrs. Comma, Rebel, Rudolph and Guilbault, and (b) the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) for Mr. Rebel only.. The estimates are determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in the Company’s financial statements for fiscal years ending October 1, 2017, October 2, 2016,3, 2021, September 27, 2020, and September 27,29, 2019

For 2021 the Pri-2012 Mortality Table was used with the MP-2020 generational scale projected from 2006; for 2020 the Pri-2012 Mortality Table was used with the MP-2019 generational scale projected from 2006, modified to use 15-year convergence to an ultimate rate of 0.75%; the RP-2014 Mortality Table was used for 2019 estimates. The amounts reported in this column may fluctuate significantly in a given year based on a number of factors that affect the formula to determine pension benefits, including changes in: (i) salary and annual incentive; (ii) years of service; and, predominantly (iii) the discount rates used in estimating present values, which were 3.11% for 2021, 3.10% for 2020; and 3.36% for 2019. Participating NEOs become vested in the Retirement Plan after five years. The Retirement Plan is closed to new participants and was sunset on December 31, 2015. For a detailed discussion of the Company’s pension benefits, see the sections of this Proxy Statement titled “Retirement Plan” and “Pension Benefits Table” and accompanying footnotes. The Company does not provide above-market or preferential earnings on non-qualified deferred compensation.
64 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(7)
TheRP-2014 Mortality Table is used table below shows the components of All Other Compensation for the Retirement PlanNEOs:
All Other Compensation Table
 
Perquisite
Allowance(a)
Deferred
Compensation
Matching
Contribution(b)
Company-
Paid Life
Insurance
Premiums
Other
Total
All Other
Compensation
Mr. Harris (CEO)
$300
$11,600
$0
$39,696(c)
$51,596
Mr. Mullany (CFO)
$300
$10,000
$187
$118,135(c)
$128,622
Ms. Hooper (Former Interim PFO)
$12,037
$17,369
$0
$0
$29,406
Mr. Ostrom (CMO)
$300
$9,600
$164
$243,684(c)
$253,748
Mr. Gordon (CSCO)
$25,073
$26,678
$457
$0
$52,208
Mr. Piano (CPO)
$240
$10,738
$137
$192,062(c)
$203,177
Mr. Martin (Former CIO)
$15,138
$5,515
$0
$592,746(d)
$613,681
(a)
Reflects the technology allowance for Messrs. Harris, Mullany, Ostrom and SERP estimates (the SERP usesPiano who do not receive a white collar adjustment)cash perquisite allowance, and for Messrs. Gordon and Martin, represents the cash perquisite allowance described in CD&A Section VI.d. (“Cash Perquisite Allowance”). Both Plans usedFor Ms. Hooper, represents theMP-2016 generational scale projected from 2006, modified to use 15 year convergence to an ultimate rate of 0.75%. The allowance she receives as Vice President, Controller and Financial Reporting and continued while serving as Interim PFO. For Ms. Hooper and Mr. Gordon, the amounts reported in this column may fluctuate significantly in a given year based on a number of factors that affect the formula to determine pension benefits, including changes in: (i) salary and annual incentive; (ii) years of service; and, predominantly (iii) the discount rates used in estimating present values, which were 3.80% for the SERP and 3.99% for the Retirement Plan for 2017, 3.60% for the SERP and 3.85% for the Retirement Plan for 2016, and 4.45% for the SERP and 4.79% for the Retirement Plan for 2015. Participating NEOs become vested in the Retirement Plan after five years, and in the SERP after attaining age 55 and completing ten years of service. Both plans have been closed to new participants, and the Retirement Plan was sunset on December 31, 2015. For a detailed discussion of the Company’s pension benefits, see the sections of this Proxy Statement titled “Retirement Plan,” “Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan” and “Pension Benefits Table” and accompanying footnotes. The Company does not provide above-market or preferential earnings onnon-qualified deferred compensation.

54    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION   

(7)

Amounts in this column for fiscal 2017 are detailed in2021 reflect one additional week of compensation due to the following table:

Company's 53-week fiscal year.

All Other Compensation Table 
    

Perquisite

Allowance

   Deferred
Compensation
Matching
Contribution (a)
   Company-
Paid Life
Insurance
Premiums
   Other  

Total

All Other
Compensation

 

Mr. Comma (CEO)

  $66,500   $47,781   $0   $0  $114,281 

Mr. Rebel (CFO)

  $52,000   $23,813   $307   $100,115 (b)  $176,235 

Ms. Allen (JIB President)

  $52,000   $42,256   $379   $0  $94,635 

Mr. Guilbault (Qdoba President)

  $52,000   $31,384   $599   $13,848 (c)  $97,831 

Mr. Rudolph (CLO)

  $52,000   $43,490   $384   $53,189 (b)  $149,063 
(b)
(a)

ReflectReflects matching contributions under the 401(k) planPlan and the restoration matching contribution in the EDCP related to fiscal 20172021 compensation. For Messrs. Comma, Rudolph and Guilbault and Ms. Allen, these amounts include the enhanced EDCP Company contribution they receive in place of the SERP, as discussed in the“Non-qualified Deferred Compensation” section below. In January 2017, Mr. Comma reached the maximum ten years of Company contributions to the EDCP and ceased receiving the enhanced EDCP Company contribution.

(c)
(b)

Represents cash dividends paid on December 16, 2016; March 20, 2017; June 12, 2017Reflects relocation expenses and September 5, 2017tax gross-ups (if any) for Mr. Rebelqualified expenses consistent with the Company’s relocation policy and Mr. Rudolph’s restricted stock shares being held in an escrow account until each executive’s termination or retirement.

approved by the Compensation Committee.
(d)
(c)

Represents reimbursement for relocation-related expenses whileFor Mr. Guilbault was based in Denver, Colorado, pendingMartin, represents severance benefits he received under the Executive Severance Plan following his separation of employment due to the Company’s decision to relocaterestructuring of the Qdoba corporate office to San Diego.

executive leadership team. He received cash payments totaling $592,746, which represents12 months of base pay, 12 months of the employer portion of COBRA premiums, a prorated annual incentive based on the Company’s fiscal 2021 performance; and, the cash equivalent for a portion of shares that would have vested within six months of his separation date.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT55

(8)
Mr. Mullany joined the Company on January 18, 2021 as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer.
(9)
Ms. Hooper completed her service as the Company’s interim principal financial officer (PFO) on January 24, 2021 after Mr. Mullany joined the Company in January 2021. Ms. Hooper was not a NEO in fiscal 2019; therefore, in accordance with the SEC’s disclosure rules, information regarding her compensation in fiscal 2019 is not included.
(10)
Mr. Ostrom joined the Company on February 1, 2021 as Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer.
(11)
Mr. Gordon was not a NEO in fiscal 2019; therefore, in accordance with the SEC’s disclosure rules, information regarding his compensation in fiscal 2019 is not included.
(12)
Mr. Piano joined the Company on April 26, 2021 as Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer.
(13)
Mr. Martin separated employment with the Company on May 7, 2021.


JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 65

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Grants of Plan-Based Awards


The following table provides information on fiscal 2017 cashthe annual incentive awards and equity incentive awards granted to our NEOs. Cash incentive awards are based onNEOs in fiscal year performance under our annual incentive plan (“AIP”). Long-term equity incentive compensation includes stock options, time-based restricted stock units, and performance share awards that vest, if at all, upon achievement of performance goals over a three fiscal year period.2021. The 20172021 incentive award terms are further described in CD&A Sections IV (“Elements of Compensation”) and VI (“Fiscal 20172021 Compensation”).

  

Grant

Date(1)

  

Approval

Date

  

Award

Type(2)

  Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (3)
  Estimated Future Payouts Under
  Equity Incentive Plan Awards (4)
  

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of

Stock or

Units #(5)

  

All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of

Securities

Underlying

Options # (6)

  

Exercise

or Base
Price of
Option

Awards

($/Share)

  

Grant

Date Fair
Value of
Stock and

Option

Awards

($) (7)

 
Name    

Threshold

($)

  

Target

($)

  

Maximum

($)

  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
     

Mr. Comma

(CEO)

  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   PSU 15-17               1,264   2,528   3,792              $253,441 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   PSU 16-18      1,193   2,385   3,578     $239,120 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   PSU 17-19      4,513   9,025   13,538     $904,880 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   RSU         13,538    $1,399,288 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   Option          41,026  $104.95  $858,264 
   11/17/2016   AIP   $ —  $900,000  $1,800,000        

Mr. Rebel

(CFO)

  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   PSU 15-17               353   706   1,059              $70,800 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   PSU 16-18      290   579   869     $58,067 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   PSU 17-19      959   1,917   2,876     $192,232 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   RSU         2,876    $297,263 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   Option          8,718  $104.95  $182,381 
   11/17/2016   AIP   $ —  $423,000  $846,000        

Ms. Allen (JIB President)

  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   PSU 15-17               214   428   642              $42,911 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   PSU 16-18      307   613   920     $61,476 
  11/29/2016   11/29/2016   PSU17-19      959   1,917   2,876     $192,232 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   RSU         2,876    $297,263 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   Option          8,718  $104.95  $182,381 
   11/17/2016   AIP   $ —  $386,250  $772,500        

Mr. Guilbault (Qdoba President)

  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   PSU 15-17               107   214   321              $21,456 
  11/29/2016   11/12/2016   PSU 16-18      85   170   256     $17,078 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   PSU 17-19      615   1,229   1,844     $123,253 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   RSU         1,844    $190,596 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   Option          5,589  $104.95  $116,922 
   11/17/2016   AIP   $ —  $281,250  $562,500        

Mr. Rudolph

(CLO)

  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   PSU 15-17               307   614   922              $61,593 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   PSU 16-18      290   579   869     $58,067 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   PSU 17-19      959   1,917   2,876     $192,232 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   RSU         2,876    $297,263 
  11/29/2016   11/17/2016   Option          8,718  $104.95  $182,381 
       11/17/2016   AIP   $ —  $384,000  $768,000                             
Name
Grant
Date(1)
Approval
Date(1)
Award
Type(2)


Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity incentive Plan Awards(3)


Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity incentive Plan Awards(4)
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units(5)
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Share)
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards(6)
Threshold
Target
Maximum
Threshold(#)
Target(#)
Maximum(#)
Mr. Harris
12/18/2020
$82,500
$825,000
$1,237,500
(CEO)
12/2/2020
11/12/2020
RSU
14,759
$1,348,973
12/21/2020
11/12/2020
PSU 21-23
7,232
14,463
21,695
$1,285,471
Mr. Mullany
12/18/2020
$37,500
$375,000
$712,500
(CFO)
2/1/2021
11/12/2020
RSU-New Hire
2,714
$250,529
2/1/2021
12/18/2020
RSU
3,256
$300,561
2/1/2021
12/18/2020
PSU 21-23
1,628
3,256
4,884
$289,393
Ms. Hooper (Former Interim PFO)
12/18/2020
$10,500
$105,000
$199,500
12/2/2020
11/12/2020
RSU
591
$54,017
2/4/2021
2/2/2021
RSU-Special
539
$52,369
Mr. Ostrom
12/18/2020
$28,800
$288,000
$547,200
(CMO)
2/15/2021
12/18/2020
RSU
3,169
$313,541
2/15/2021
12/18/2020
PSU 21-23
1,585
3,169
4,754
$281,661
Mr. Gordon
12/18/2020
$18,700
$187,000
$355,300
(CSCO)
12/2/2020
11/12/2020
RSU
1,181
$107,943
12/21/2020
11/12/2020
PSU 19-21
101
203
304
$17,998
12/21/2020
11/12/2020
PSU 21-23
579
1,158
1,737
$102,923
Mr. Piano
3/23/2021
$21,000
$210,000
$399,000
(CPO)
5/10/2021
3/23/2021
RSU-New Hire
2,035
$246,337
Mr. Martin (Former CIO)
12/18/2020
$18,300
$183,000
$347,700
12/2/2020
11/12/2020
RSU
1,181
$107,943
12/21/2020
11/12/2020
PSU 19-21
101
203
304
$17,998
12/21/2020
11/12/2020
PSU 21-23
579
1,158
1,737
$102,923
(1)

AllAnnual equity grants were approved at the November 201612, 2020 Committee meeting, with a grant date of November 29, 2016,December 2, 2020 for RSUs, and a grant date of December 21, 2020 for PSUs which was the secondfirst business day following the date in which the Committee established the PSU performance goals. For the NEOs who joined the Company after the annual equity grants (Messrs. Mullany, Ostrom, and Piano), the Committee approved the equity awards to be granted two weeks following each of the Company’s next open trading window, as is the Company’s standard practice.their respective hire dates. In accordance with ASC 718, the “grant date” is shown for the portion of the PSUs awarded in fiscal 20172021 that relate to the fiscal 20172021-2023 performance period, and for Messrs. Gordon and Martin, the portion of the PSUs awarded in fiscal 2015 and 2016 related to2019 for the fiscal 20172021 performance period, as further described in Footnote 7 to this table.

(2)

For PSU awards, this column shows the three fiscal years of the PSU performance period.

(3)

This column showsReflects the potential payouts under the fiscal 20172021 annual incentive plan which(“AIP”) that could have been earned based on performance in fiscal 2017. The2021. Under the AIP, the threshold payout represents the amount payable for achieving threshold level of performance on the strategic goals and is zero at threshold on financial goals; target payout represents the amount payable for achieving the target level of performance,performance; and for maximum payout, is capped at two timesfor our CEO represents 150% of target payout. Incentivepayout for both financial and strategic goals, and for our other NEOs, represents 200% of target payout for financial goals and 150% of target payout for strategic goals. Performance achievement and incentive payouts are prorated between performance levels, and the payout values are calculated using the executive’s annual salary rate as specified at the time performance goals are approved by the Committee.levels. The SCT for fiscal 20172021 shows the actual cash incentive compensation earned by our NEOs for fiscal 2017 performance.

2021 performance, including prorated amounts for NEOs who joined the Company during the fiscal 2021.
(4)

This column showsReflects the threshold, target, and maximum potential share payout levels for the PSUs under the Company’s long-term incentive plan for the three year performance period, fiscal2017-19 2021-23 PSU award, and for Messrs. Gordon and Martin the fiscal 20172021 performance period of the2015-17 and2016-18 2019-2021 PSU awards. The amount for the2017-19 PSU award represents (a) the entire three-fiscal year period for one of the two performance metrics (ROIC from Operations), and (b) the fiscal 2017 performance period only for the second metric (consolidated systemwide sales growth) for the reasons explained in Footnote 7. Threshold payout for all of the PSUs reflected above is 50% of target and requires achieving an established minimum performance requirement (there is no payout if performance doesn’t meet the minimum requirement). Maximum payout is 150% of target.

(5)

This column showsReflects the number of RSUs granted on November 29, 2016 that vest 25% per year over four years on each anniversary of the grant date.

(6)

This column shows the number of stock options granted on November 29, 2016 that vest 33% per year over three years on each anniversary of the grant date. The options expire seven years from grant date. The exercise price is the closing price of Common Stock on the grant date ($104.95).

(7)

For stock options, the value represents the grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC 718, which is a theoretical value at grant using a valuation model that requires the input of assumptions, including the expected volatility of our stock price. As such, the values may not reflect the actual amounts that our NEOs will realize; rather the actual amount realized will depend on the Company’s stock price relative to the exercise price. The values of PSUs and RSUs also represent the grant date fair values, as computed in accordance with ASC 718, based on the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the grant date discounted by the present value of the expected dividend stream over the vesting period, as applicable, which for the annual PSU grants was $100.26$88.88 and the RSU grants was $91.40. The grant date fair values of the RSU grants to Messrs. Mullany, Ostrom, and Piano was $92.31, 98.94, and $121.05 respectively; and for PSUs and $103.36 for RSUs.Ms. Hooper’s special RSU retention grant, $97.16. The grant date fair values of all awards were determined based on the assumptions and methodologies set forth in the Company’s 20172021 Annual Report on Form10-K (Note 12,13, Share-Based Employee Compensation). PSU awards, which cliff vest after three years are made annually and vest based on the Company’s performance duringfor the succeeding three-fiscal year performance period. The performance metrics and goals are established at the beginning of the three- fiscalthree-fiscal year performance period when the grant is made; whilemade. For Messrs. Gordon and Martin, the specific performance goals are either set byfiscal 2019 PSU award (“PSU 19-21) represents the Committee (a) at that time also forlast fiscal year of the full three-fiscal year performance period or (b)for a portion of the PSU award, for which the Committee established goals at the beginning of each fiscal year for that portion of the performance period;2021; in accordance with SEC rules and ASC 718, the values shown on each of the three rows for the PSUs reflectPSU 19-21 reflects the grant date fair value of the fiscal 2017 performance period (total or2021 portion as applicable) of the awardaward. The grant date fair value for PSUs is reported based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions (target level performance) of each ofat the PSU awards.

grant date.

56    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


66 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION|  

2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2017

2021

The following table provides information on all outstanding option awards and unvested stock awards held by each of the NEOs at the end of fiscal 2017. Each option grant is shown separately and the vesting schedule is shown as Footnote 1 to the table.2021. The market value of the stock awards is based on the closing price of Jack in the Box Inc. Common Stock as of the last trading day of the fiscal year, September 29, 2017,October 3, 2021, which was $101.92.

  Option Awards(1)  Stock Awards 
Name 

Option

Grant Date

  

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

(#)

  

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Unexercisable

(#)

  

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

  

Option

Expiration

Date

  

Number

Of Shares

or Units

of Stock

That

Have Not

Vested

(#)(2)

  

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

($)

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other Rights

That Have

Not Vested

(#) (3) 

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other Rights

That Have

Not Vested

($)

 

Mr. Comma (CEO)

  11/25/2014   30,640   15,320  $73.53   11/25/2021   148,682  $15,153,669   18,656  $1,901,420 
  11/24/2015   14,455   28,910  $75.24   11/24/2022     
   11/29/2016      41,026  $104.95   11/29/2023                 

Mr. Rebel (CFO)

  11/26/2013   25,263     $47.29   11/26/2020   80,147  $8,168,582   4,216  $429,695 
  11/25/2014   8,561   4,281  $73.53   11/25/2021     
  11/24/2015   3,511   7,020  $75.24   11/24/2022     
   11/29/2016      8,718  $104.95   11/29/2023                 

Ms. Allen

  11/25/2014   5,188   2,595  $73.53   11/25/2021   13,130  $1,338,210   4,334  $441,721 

(JIB President)

  11/24/2015   3,717   7,434  $75.24   11/24/2022     
   11/24/2015      8,718  $104.95   11/29/2023                 

Mr. Guilbault

  11/26/2013   1,925     $47.29   11/26/2020   6,087  $620,387   2,003  $204,146 

(Qdoba President)

  11/25/2014   1,297   1,297  $73.53   11/25/2021     
  11/24/2015   1,033   2,064  $75.24   11/24/2022     
   11/29/2016      5,589  $104.95   11/29/2023                 

Mr. Rudolph (CLO)

  11/25/2014   7,447   3,724  $73.53   11/25/2021   74,560  $7,599,155   4,216  $429,695 
  11/24/2015   3,511   7,020  $75.24   11/24/2022     
   11/29/2016      8,718  $104.95   11/29/2023                 
$99.51.
 
Option Awards(1)
Stock Awards
Name
Option
Grant
Date
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number Of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(1)
Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)(2)
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)
Mr. Harris (CEO)
21,167
$2,106,328
14,463
$1,439,213
Mr. Mullany (CFO)
5,970
$594,075
3,256
$324,005
Ms. Hooper (Former Interim PFO)
1,718
$170,958
$
Mr. Ostrom
(CMO)
3,169
$315,347
3,169
$315,347
Mr. Gordon(3)
(CSCO)
11/29/2016
2,051
$104.95
11/29/2023
4,354
$433,267
2,135
$212,454
2/26/2018
4,859
$90.06
2/26/2025
12/16/2019
1,669
3,338
$75.23
12/16/2026
Mr. Piano
(CPO)
2,035
$202,503
$
Mr. Martin(4) (Former CIO)
$
$
(1)

All option awards vest 33% each year for three years from date of grant.

(2)

The amounts in this column are:

Reflects (a) unvested restricted stock awards or RSUs granted under the stock ownership program with vesting subject to the executive’s continued employment with the Company, and full vesting ten years from the grant date and issued only upon termination (Mr. Comma, 34,700; Mr. Rebel, 62,572; and Mr. Rudolph, 58,815);

(b) unvested RSUs that vest (i) for each executive: (A) 20% each year for five years for grants prior to November 2015, and (B)executive, except Ms. Hooper, 25% each year forover four years beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date; and for Ms. Hooper, 33% each year over three years beginning on the regular November 2015first anniversary of the grant date; and 2016 grants (Mr. Comma, 40,213; Mr. Rebel, 11,102; Ms. Allen, 8,577; Mr. Guilbault, 3,986; and Mr. Rudolph, 9,926); and (ii)(b) for Mr. Comma’s FY 2016 special retention stock award: 49,560 RSUs that vest 50% four years after the date of grant and the remaining 50% five years after grant; and

(c)Gordon, unvested PSUs for which the performance goals have been met for a completed performance period and that vest upon the third anniversary of the November 2014, November 2015 and November 20162018 grant dates,date (1,591), subject to the executive’shis continued employment with the Company (Mr. Comma, 24,209; Mr. Rebel, 6,473; Ms. Allen, 4,553; Mr. Guilbault, 2,101; and Mr. Rudolph, 5,819).

Company.
(3)
(2)

This column showsReflects the number of unvested PSUs granted in November 2014, November 2015December 2019 and November 2016December 2020 at target payout level, for which the performance achievement was not yet known at fiscalyear-end (“FYE”), and that vestvests upon the third anniversary of each grant date. The share amount is reported at target payout level.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT57

(3)
Options vest 33% per year beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.
(4)
Mr. Martin separated employment with the Company on May 7, 2021 and all unvested equity awards were automatically forfeited.


JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 67

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2017

2021

The following table provides information on stock option exercisesoptions that were exercised and shares that were acquired on the vesting of stock awards by theour NEOs during fiscal 2017. Option award value realized is calculated by subtracting the aggregate exercise price of the options exercised from the aggregate fair market value of the shares of Jack in the Box Inc. stock acquired on the date of exercise.2021. Stock award value realized is calculated by multiplying the number of shares shown in the table by the closing price of our stock on the date the stock awards vested.

   Option Awards   Stock Awards(1) 
    Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)
   Value Realized on
Exercise ($)
   Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
   Value Realized on
Vesting ($)
 

Mr. Comma (CEO)

   25,529   $1,474,431    36,557   $3,930,757 

Mr. Rebel (CFO)

   0   $0    13,714   $1,471,296 

Ms. Allen (JIB President)

   0   $0    2,836   $286,210 

Mr. Guilbault (Qdoba President)

   1,297   $42,051    2,747   $295,673 

Mr. Rudolph (CLO)

   20,722   $1,200,371    10,763   $1,155,575 
 
Option Awards
Stock Awards(1)
 
Number of Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
Number of Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
Mr. Harris (CEO)
$
2,137
$259,752
Mr. Mullany (CFO)
$
$
Ms. Hooper (Former Interim PFO)
$
558
$51,377
Mr. Ostrom (CMO)
$
$
Mr. Gordon (CSCO)
2,171
$55,511
1,845
$169,989
Mr. Piano (CPO)
$
$
Mr. Martin (Former CIO)
6,914
$205,346
1,627
$149,884
(1)

The reported number of shares and value realized on vesting includes time-vested RSUs, granted in prior years, and for Messrs. Gordon and Martin, also includes the PSUs granted in November 2013December 2017 for the fiscal 2018-2020 performance period, fiscal 2014-2016, which vested in November 2016December 2020 and resulted in a payout of 122.4%91% of the target PSU award.

Retirement Plan Benefits


The following table provides information on the pension benefits forunder the NEOs under each of the following pension plans:

Company’s Retirement Plan

for NEOs. The Retirement Plan is a Company-funded andtax-qualified retirement plan that was offered to eligible employees hired prior to January 1, 2011 that had reached age 21 and completed one year of service (at least 1,000 hours/year). Four NEOs who were hired prior to 2011 participate in the plan. Participants are 100% vested after completing five years (1,000 hours per year) of service. Ms. Hooper and Mr. Gordon were hired prior to 2011 and are vested participants in the plan. As of December 31, 2015, the Retirement Plan was “sunset” and employees no longer accrue additional benefits based on additional pay and service. The plan provides that a participant retiring at the normal retirement age of 65 will receive benefits based primarily on the formula described below:

(1)
(1)

1% of the average of the five highest consecutive calendar years of pay (“Final Average Pay”, includes base(base salary and annual incentive)incentive out of the last ten years of eligible service (referred to as “Final Average Pay”), multiplied by the number of full calendar years and months while an eligible employee.

PLUS

(2)
(2)

0.4% of Final Average Pay in excess of Covered Compensation (average of the Social Security taxable wage bases) multiplied by the number of full calendar years and months while an eligible employee (up to a maximum of 35 years).

A participant in the Retirement Plan who has at least ten years of vesting service may elect to begin receiving reduced payments as early as age 55. Note: Prior to 1989, benefits are subject to grandfathered minimum benefit accruals under the previous plan. Retirement plan benefits are (i) not

permitted to be paid to participants while actively employed with Jack in the Box Inc., and (ii) typically paid in the form of a monthly annuity unless the present value of the accrued benefit is equal to or less than $20,000 (previously $15,000) at termination and in such event, may be paid in the form of a lump sum payment.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP)

Effective January 1, 2007, the SERP was closed to new participants. Executives and certain “highly compensated employees” who were hired or promoted into such position prior to January 1, 2007 (including one NEO) are eligible to participate in the SERP. The SERP, established in 1990, provides for retirement benefits above amounts available under the Company’s Retirement Plan due to IRC limits that restrict benefits available under the Company’stax-qualified plan. The SERP is unfunded and not qualified for tax purposes.

The SERP provides that a participant retiring at the normal retirement age of 62 will receive a benefit equal to a target replacement income, based on final average pay and service. When combined with other amounts payable under the Company’stax-qualified pension benefit, and other qualified andnon-qualified deferred compensation programs, the target replacement income is up to 60% of Final Average Pay and subject to the following conditions:

Final Average Pay is defined as the average of the five highest calendar years of pay (base salary and annual incentive) out of the last ten years of employment with the Company.

58    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


68 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION|  

2022 PROXY STATEMENT

Service is defined as the entire period of employment in calendar years and months while an eligible employee.

There is no reduction in the target replacement income (60%) if a participant has 20 or more years of service. For participants with less than 20 years of service, the target replacement income percentage is determined by multiplying the number of years of service times 3%, up to a maximum of 20 years.

To receive a retirement benefit under the SERP, a participant must attain the earlier of (i) age 62 or (ii) age 55 with ten years of service while employed at Jack in the Box or while disabled. A participant may begin receiving payments as early as age 55 subject to a reduction in benefits (equal to 5/12 of 1% for each month by which commencement of benefit payments precedes the participant’s attainment of age 62).


Benefits under the SERP are only available to retirees as monthly payments and cannot be received in a lump sum.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Death benefits are payable if a participant dies while employed.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The SERP provides for spousal joint and survivor annuities.

The following table provides information on the actuarial present value of the NEOs’ accumulated pension and SERP benefits as of the end of fiscal 20172021 (October 1, 2017), using fiscal 2017 earnings (base salary and annual incentive)3, 2021). The maximum amounts used for the Retirement Plan do not exceed theIRS-prescribed limit applicable totax-qualified plans ($270,000
($265,000 for 2017)2015, the year the Retirement Plan was sunset). Present values were calculated using the interest rate and mortality assumptions used in the Company’s financial statements for fiscal year 2017.

2021.

Pension Benefits Table 
    Plan Name (1)  Number of Years
Credited Service
(#)
   Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit at Normal
Retirement Age ($) (2)
   Payments During
Last Year ($)
 

Mr. Comma (CEO)

  Retirement Plan   14   $381,504   $0 

Mr. Rebel (CFO)

  Retirement Plan   12   $525,998   $0 
   SERP   14   $6,676,481   $0 

Ms. Allen (JIB President)

  None   N/A    N/A    N/A 

Mr. Guilbault (Qdoba President)

  Retirement Plan   11   $387,445   $0 

Mr. Rudolph (CLO)

  Retirement Plan   8   $335,935   $0 
Pension Benefits Table
 
Plan Name(1)
Number of Years
Credited Service
(#)
Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit at Normal
Retirement Age
($)(2)
Payments
During
Last Year
($)
Mr. Harris (CEO)
None
N/A
N/A
$0
Mr. Mullany (CFO)
None
N/A
N/A
$0
Ms. Hooper (Former Interim PFO)
Retirement Plan
15
$541,336
$0
Mr. Ostrom (CMO)
None
N/A
N/A
$0
Mr. Gordon (CSCO)
Retirement Plan
6
$334,306
$0
Mr. Piano (CPO)
None
N/A
N/A
$0
Mr. Martin (Former CIO)
None
N/A
N/A
$0
(1)

Messrs. Comma, Rebel, Rudolph

Ms. Hooper and Guilbault participateMr. Gordon are vested participants in the Retirement Plan; Mr. Rebel is the only NEO who participates in the SERP.

Plan.
(2)

As of the end of fiscal 2017, all four Retirement Plan participants are vested in the Plan, and Mr. Rebel has met the service and minimum age requirements for vesting in the SERP. The actuarial present value of accumulated benefits under the Retirement Plan and the SERP is based on a discount ratesrate of 3.99% and 3.80% respectively,3.11%, as of October 1, 2017.3, 2021. TheRP-2014 Pri-2012 Mortality Table is used for bothwith the Retirement Plan and the SERP calculations (the SERP uses a white collar adjustment). Both Plans use theMP-2016MP-2020 generational scale projected from 2006, modified to use 15 year convergence to an ultimate rate of 0.75%.2006. Participants are assumed to retire at the latest of current age and the plan’s earliest retirement date with unreduced benefits. Nopre-retirement mortality, retirement, or termination has been assumed for the present value factors.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation


Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (EDCP)

In addition to eligibility to participate in the 401(k) Plan, the NEOs and other highly compensated employees are eligible to defer up to 50% of base salary and up to 85% of annual incentive pay to the EDCP, an unfunded,non-qualified deferred compensation plan, with benefits paid by the Company out of its general assets. The plan is subject to IRC Section 409A for all deferred compensation earned on or after January 1, 2005; deferred compensation earned prior to 2005 is not subject to Section 409A requirements and continues to be governed under the terms of the plan and tax laws in effect on or before December 31, 2004, as applicable. In conjunction2005. To provide participants with the 401(k) Plan changes that took effect January 1, 2016, the EDCP Company matching contribution (previously 100% of the first three percent of compensation deferred) was replaced with a “restoration matching contribution.” This means the Company will matchopportunity to receive up to the full four percent potential matching contribution offered in the 401(k), the Company provides a “restoration matching contribution” to the EDCP for

participants

participants

whose deferrals to the 401(k) Plan (and related Company matching contributions) wereare limited due to the IRC limits applicable to the 401(k) Plan. A participant must be employed on the last day of the calendar year to receive the restoration matching contribution, which is then 100% vested. Company matching contributions made prior to January 1, 2016 vest at a rate of 25% per year (such that the match fully vests after completion of four full years of service with the Company). Participants may choose from an array of investment options.

Enhanced EDCP — Beginning January 1, 2007, new Corporate Vice Presidents and above who otherwise would have been eligible for the SERP receive an additional annual Company contribution of 4% of base salary and annual incentive to their EDCP account for up to ten years. In January 2017, theten-year period during which Mr. Comma received the additional 4% Company EDCP contribution came to an

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT59


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

end, and he ceased receiving these contributions. Participants become vested in the supplemental contribution at the rate of 25% per year (such that they are fully vested after completing four full years of service with the Company). The Enhanced EDCP was closed to new participants as of May 7, 2015.

The following table provides information on the contributions, earnings, withdrawals and distributions in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan during fiscal 20172021 and the account balances as of the end of fiscal 2017. As of October 1, 2017, all NEOs, except Ms. Allen are 100% vested in Company contributions.

2021.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan Table 
    Executive
Contributions in
Fiscal 2017(1)
   Registrant
Contributions In
Fiscal 2017(2)
   Aggregate
Earnings in
Fiscal 2017
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
   Aggregate
Balance at
FYE17 (3)
 

Mr. Comma (CEO)

  $232,866   $47,781   $297,892   $   $3,798,771 

Mr. Rebel (CFO)

  $24,435   $23,813   $91,907   $   $1,325,431 

Ms. Allen (JIB President)

  $37,518   $42,256   $53,470   $   $527,627 

Mr. Guilbault (Qdoba President)

  $58,922   $31,384   $172,368   $   $2,365,906 

Mr. Rudolph (CLO)

  $54,605   $43,490   $141,393   $   $1,510,627 
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan Table
 
Executive
Contributions in
Fiscal 2021(1)
Registrant
Contributions In
Fiscal 2021(2)
Aggregate
Earnings in
Fiscal 2021
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
Aggregate
Balance at
FYE21(3)
Mr. Harris (CEO)
$0
$0
$0
$—
$0
Mr. Mullany (CFO)
$0
$0
$0
$—
$0
Ms. Hooper (interim PFO)
$6,157
$5,112
$62,461
$—
$346,447
Mr. Ostrom (CMO)
$0
$0
$0
$—
$0
Mr. Gordon (CSCO)
$60,954
$16,948
$31,560
$—
$690,542
Mr. Piano (CPO)
$2,423
$6,280
$(6)
$—
$827
Mr. Martin (Former CIO)
$0
$0
$81,690
$—
$517,678
(1)

These amounts are also included in the salary andnon-equity incentive plan compensation columns in the 20172021 row of the SCT.

(2)

These amounts represent only the restoration matching contributions in the non-qualified EDCP and are reported as “All Other Compensation” in the SCT.

SCT and represent a portion of the total amount reported as deferred compensation matching contribution in footnote 7 to the SCT, which also includes contributions to the 401(k).
(3)

Amounts reported in this column are included in the “Salary” column in the SCT in prior years if the NEO was a named executive officer in previous years. The balance at FYE 20172021 reflects the cumulative value of each NEO’s deferrals, match, and investment gains or losses. These FYE amounts do not include contributions or earnings related to the fiscal 20172021 annual incentive payment which was paid after the end of fiscal 20172021 (but which amounts are included in the executive and registrant contributions columns of this table).

JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 69

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Potential Payments on Termination of Employment or Change in Control


Compensation & Benefits Assurance Agreements (CIC Agreements).The Company provides CIC Agreements because it considers it in the best interest of its stockholders to encourage continued employment of key management in the event of a CIC transaction. These agreements help facilitate successful performance by key executives during an impending CIC, by protecting them against the loss of their positions following a change in the ownership or control of the Company and ensuring that his or her expectations for long-term incentive compensation arrangements will be fulfilled. Generally, under the agreements, a Company CIC is defined to include:

(i)

the acquisition by any person or group of 50% or more of the outstanding stock or combined voting power of the Company (excluding acquisitions by the fiduciary of the Company benefit plans or certain affiliates);

(ii)

circumstances in which individuals constituting our board of directors generally cease to constitute a majority of the board; and

(iii)

certain stockholder-approved mergers, consolidations, sales of assets or liquidation of the Company.

In connection with the Company’s evaluation of Qdoba strategic alternatives, in 2017, the Company entered into a second agreement with Mr. Guilbault, providing him similar benefits to the CIC Agreement in the event of his qualifying termination from Qdoba within 24 months following a separation of the Qdoba business (a “Qdoba CIC”), defined as either (a) a complete liquidation of Qdoba Restaurant

Corporation, or (b) the consummation of a sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the business or assets of the Qdoba business to an unrelated third party. The benefits are the same as those provided in the CIC agreement, except where specified below, and for Mr. Guilbault, references to a CIC below also include a Qdoba CIC.

These CIC Agreements provide certain specified benefits to the executive if, within twenty-four (24) full calendar months following the effective date of a CIC, his or her employment is terminated (“Qualifying Termination”):

(i)

involuntarily other than for cause (which is defined in the agreements and includes acting deliberately and in bad faith or committing fraud), death, or disability, or

(ii)

voluntarily for good reason. Voluntary termination for good reason is generally defined as the executive’s resignation due to: (a) the assignment of the executive to duties or responsibilities inconsistent with his or her status, or a reduction or alteration in the nature or status of his or her duties or responsibilities in effect as of 90 days prior to the CIC event; (b) the acquiring company’s requirement that the executive be based at a location in excess of 50 miles from his or her location immediately prior to a CIC; (c) a material reduction in base salary; (d) a material reduction in the Company’s compensation, health and welfare, retirement benefit plans, or any perquisites, unless an alternative plan is provided of a comparable value; or (e) the Company’s failure to require any successor to assume the CIC Agreement benefits.

CIC benefits under the CIC Agreements are not provided in the event of terminations by reason of death, disability,

60    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

voluntary termination without good reason, or the Company’s involuntary termination of the executive’s employment for cause. CIC benefits under the CIC Agreements are also not provided in the event of a CIC when there is not a corresponding Qualifying Termination (except for a benefit for Mr. Guilbault in the event of a Qdoba CIC).

Termination. In the event of a CIC of the Company and Qualifying Termination of an executive covered under a CIC Agreement as described above, the executive is entitled to the following severance benefits:

1.

A lump sum cash payment equal to his or her accrued but unpaid annual salary and unreimbursed business expenses.

2.

A lump sum cash amount equal to a multiple of the executive’s then-current annual salary, based on his or her position, as follows:

Multiple of Base Salary
Messrs. Harris, Mullany, and Ostrom
Multiple of Salary
2.5x

Mr. Comma

Messrs. Gordon, Piano and Martin
3.0x

Messrs. Rebel, Guilbault and Rudolph and Ms. Allen

1.5x
2.5x

*
Ms. Hooper, Interim PFO, does not have a CIC agreement.
3.

A lump sum cash incentive award equal to the multiple above times the greater of: (a) the average annual incentive percentage for the last three fiscal years prior to the CIC times annual salary; or (b) the average dollar amount of the annual incentive paid for the last three fiscal years prior to the CIC. If an executive does not have three full years of incentive awards, the Company will apply the target incentive award percentage for each missed year.

4.

Continuation of health insurance coverage at Company expense at the same cost and same coverage level as in effect as of the executive’s Qualifying Termination date (subject to changes in coverage levels applicable to all employees generally) for a specified coverage period as provided below, to run concurrently with any coverage provided under COBRA. If an executive receives health insurance coverage with a subsequent employer prior to the end of 18 months, the continuation of health insurance coverage under the agreement is discontinued.

Coverage Period
Messrs. Harris, Mullany, and Ostrom
Coverage Period
30 months

Mr. Comma

Messrs. Gordon, Piano, and Martin
36
18 months

Messrs. Rebel, Guilbault and Rudolph and Ms. Allen

30 months

5.

Standard outplacement services at Company expense, from a nationally recognized outplacement firm selected by the executive, for a period of up to one year from the date of Qualifying Termination.

6.

Vesting of unvested restricted stock and RSUs, PSUs, andin-the-money stock options, in accordance with the terms of the applicable award agreement and stock incentive plan. Since 2014, allAll options and RSU awards provide that unvested units that continue after a CIC are “double-

trigger”“double-trigger”, requiring both a CIC and Qualifying Termination for vesting to accelerate. (For grants prior to 2014, and for PSU grants, no Qualifying Termination is required.) Since 2014, theThe terms of PSU awards provide for accelerated vesting upon a CIC that pays out at actual levels achieved for completed performance periods and at target level for incomplete periods. See Footnote 4 to the following table. With regard to Mr. Guilbault’s additional Qdoba CIC agreement, in the event of a Qdoba separation, the acquiring corporation shall assume the outstanding equity awards or substitute substantially equivalent awards in the acquirer’s stock. Should the acquirer elect not to assume or substitute, the agreement provides that Mr. Guilbault’s outstanding awards will be cancelled and he will receive alump-sum cash payment equal in value to the fair market value of the cancelled awards on the effective date of the Qdoba CIC.

7.

There is one NEO (our CFO) with apre-2009 agreement in effect as of fiscal 2017 year-end (who has announced his intent to retire during fiscal 2018); in the event that any portion of the payments and benefits provided for under his agreement are considered excess parachute payments under IRC Section 280G and are thus subject to the 20% excise tax imposed by IRC Section 4999, the agreement provides for a conditionalgross-up payment to reimburse the CFO for the excise tax and additional taxes resulting from the imposition of the excise tax. Thegross-up payment will be made only if the amounts treated as “parachute payments” under Section 280G exceed the Section 280G threshold by more than 10%. If the parachute payments exceed the Section 280G threshold by 10% or less, then the payments to the executive will be reduced to an amount that is one dollar less the Section 280G threshold. At the time this agreement was entered into, the potential tax “gross up” payment, in the Committee’s view, was an appropriate method for the Company to insulate the executives from excise tax imposed under Section 4999 and was a more common practice in the market.

8.

For agreements in 2009 and later, there is no excise tax gross up. The four remaining NEOs are parties to this form of agreement, which provides for payment of the greater of: (i) the aggregate parachute payments reduced to the maximum amount that would not subject the executive to relevant excise taxes; or (ii) the aggregate parachute payments, with the executive paying the relevant excise taxes and such other applicable federal, state and local income and employment taxes. Under this “best after tax” provision, the executive is solely responsible for payment of excise taxes and other applicable federal, state, and local income and employment taxes.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. For the one NEO who is a SERP participant, in the event of an involuntary termination (or material diminution in duties or responsibilities

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT61


70 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

or material downward change of title) within 24 months following

vesting upon a CIC that pays out at actual levels achieved for completed performance periods and at target level for incomplete periods. See Footnote 4 to the SERP providesfollowing table.
No outstanding CIC Agreements (or any other agreements with our NEOs) provide for any excise tax gross up for excess parachute payments under IRC Section 280G. The Agreements provide for payment of the greater of: (i) the aggregate parachute payments reduced to the participantmaximum amount that would not subject the executive to relevant excise taxes; or (ii) the aggregate parachute payments, with the executive paying the relevant excise taxes and such other applicable federal, state and local income and employment taxes. Under this “best after tax” provision, the executive is solely responsible for payment of the actuarial equivalent of his accrued early retirement benefit unreduced for early commencement, in the form of three annual installments commencing on termination.

excise taxes and other applicable federal, state, and local income and employment taxes.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation.In the event of a CIC, in accordance with the EDCP, a participant shall become 100% vested in any Company contributions without regard to service requirements. Accountsaccounts shall be distributed in accordance with the participant’s existing distribution election (on termination of employment or under a scheduledin-service withdrawal).

Termination of Employment Without Change in Control.In the event of a termination not related to a CIC, NEOs will receive amounts under the terms and provisions of the specific plans in which they are a participant, including the Retirement Plan the SERP and the EDCP, and with respect to

EDCP. Additionally, the NEOs (other than Ms. Allen, her offer letter.

Mr. Rebel is the only NEO who is a SERP participant andHooper) are eligible to retire under that plan. Messrs. Rebel and Rudolph are both eligible to retirefor severance benefits under the Retirement plan.

Executive Severance Plan adopted in February 2020. The Executive Severance Plan provides severance benefits in the event of an involuntary termination other than for cause (which is defined in the plan and includes acting deliberately and in bad faith or committing fraud) and other than upon death, disability or voluntary resignation, and in any case that does not occur during the twenty-four months following a CIC (a Non-CIC Qualifying Termination). Upon such a Non-CIC Qualifying Termination, the Executive Severance Plan provides for the following primary benefits, expressly contingent on the executive timely executing an effective general release of claims against the Company:
A severance payment in the amount of 12 months of base salary (24 months in the case of the CEO);

62    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT

A payment equivalent to the aggregate amount of the executive’s monthly COBRA premium payment in excess of the monthly premium the executive would pay as an active employee of the Company, for 12 months (24 months in the case of the CEO); and


A prorated annual incentive payment for the year in which the termination occurs, based on actual achievement of the performance goals under the Company’s performance incentive program for such fiscal year.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION|  

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 71

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Potential Payments on Termination of Employment or Change in Control


The following table helps illustrateillustrates the potential payments and benefits our current NEOs would be entitled to as of fiscal 20172020 year-end: (1) in the event of a termination of employment not related to a CIC, including (i) voluntary termination, or (ii) involuntary termination without cause that is a Non-CIC Qualifying Termination, or (iii) due to death or disability; and (2) in the event of a CIC and a Qualifying Termination, and (3) in the event of a CIC without a corresponding termination of employment.Termination. All references to “CIC” refer to a “Company CIC” as defined in theCompensation & Benefits Assurance Agreementssection —except in the final two rows for Mr. Guilbault explained in Notes 8 and 8a below.

section.

The potential payments assume that the termination and/or termination resulting from a CIC occurred on the last day of fiscal 2017,2021, October 1, 2017, 3, 2021,

and, where applicable, use the closing price of our Common Stock of $101.92$99.51 on September 29, 2017October 3, 2021 (the last market trading day in the fiscal year). The actual amounts to which ana NEO may be eligible to receive can only be determined at the time of such termination or CIC, and therefore, the actual amounts will vary from the estimated amounts in the table below.below for any NEO who has not terminated service as of the last day of fiscal 2021. For NEOs who separated service with the Company during fiscal 2021, the actual payments such NEOs received, if any in connection with their termination, are described in the section after the table.
 
Cash
Payment(1)
Annual
Incentive(2)
Continuation
of Benefits(3)
Equity
Incentive
and Stock
Awards(4)
Pension
Benefits(5)
Total
Mr. Harris (CEO)
Triggering Event
Voluntary
Involuntary Termination without Cause/Non-CIC
Qualifying Termination
$1,650,000
$1,182,606
$35,739
$
$2,868,345
Death or Disability
$1,182,606
$
$2,590,988
$
$3,773,594
CIC/Qualifying Termination
$2,062,500(6)
$1,943,838
$564,674
$3,484,996
$
$7,546,008
Mr. Mullany (CFO)
Voluntary
Involuntary Termination without Cause/Non-CIC
Qualifying Termination
$500,000
$465,387
$14,602
$979,989
Death or Disability
$465,387
$594,075
$1,059,462
CIC/Qualifying Termination
$1,250,000
$1,012,823
$31,904
$918,080
$3,212,807
Ms. Hooper (Former Interim PFO) *
Triggering Event
Voluntary
$541,336
$541,336
Involuntary Termination without Cause/Non-CIC
Qualifying Termination
$255,478
$10,000
$541,336
$806,814
Death or Disability
$101,914
$97,221
$541,336
$740,471
CIC/Qualifying Termination
Mr. Ostrom (CMO)
Triggering Event
Voluntary
Involuntary Termination without Cause/Non-CIC
Qualifying Termination
$480,000
$317,243
$12,793
$810,036
Death or Disability
$317,243
$315,347
$632,590
CIC/Qualifying Termination
$1,200,000
$761,194
$29,190
$630,694
$2,621,078
Mr. Gordon (CSCO) – Retirement Eligible
Triggering Event
Voluntary
$426,739
$334,306
$761,045
Involuntary Termination without Cause/Non-CIC
Qualifying Termination
$374,000
$335,090
$17,870
$426,739
$334,306
$1,488,005
Death or Disability
$335,090
$459,158
$334,306
$1,128,554
CIC/Qualifying Termination
$561,000
$452,814
$36,804
$568,447
$334,306
$1,953,371
Mr. Piano (CPO)
Triggering Event
Voluntary
$
$
$
Involuntary Termination without Cause/Non-CIC
Qualifying Termination
$420,000
$144,577
$14,457
$
$
$579,034
Death or Disability
$144,577
$202,503
$
$347,080
CIC/Qualifying Termination
$630,000
$289,603
$31,686
$202,503
$
$1,153,792
*
Ms. Hooper is not a participant in the Executive Severance Plan. In the event of an involuntary termination without Cause, she may receive benefits under the Company’s standard severance program for non-executive officers which provides for 2 weeks cash severance per year of service up to a maximum of 52 weeks and the cash value of unvested RSUs that would have vested between fiscal year end 2021 through December 31, 2021; and if enrolled in the Company’s medical plans at the time of termination, cash severance to assist with COBRA premiums, equal to a fixed amount for every 4 weeks of severance.
72 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

    Lump Sum
Cash
Payment (1)
  Annual
Incentive (2)
  Continuation
of Benefits (3)
   Equity
Incentive
and Stock
Awards(4)
   Pension
and SERP
Benefits(5)
   Gross-Up for
Excise Tax (6)
   Total 

Mr. Comma (CEO)

            

Termination Reason

            
Voluntary/Involuntary Termination                $381,504       $381,504 

Death

            $13,922,864   $381,504       $14,304,368 

Disability

            $12,716,610   $381,504       $13,098,114 

CIC/Qualifying Termination

  $(7)  $2,694,010 (7)  $50,596   $15,190,247   $381,504       $18,316,357 

CIC/No Termination

            $5,531,869           $5,531,869 

Mr. Rebel (CFO)

            

Termination Reason

            
Voluntary/Involuntary Termination            $1,735,462   $7,202,479       $8,937,941 

Death

            $1,735,462   $7,202,479       $8,937,941 

Disability

            $1,426,631   $7,202,479       $8,629,110 

CIC/Qualifying Termination

  $1,410,000  $1,298,845  $35,393   $2,017,563   $5,937,738       $10,699,539 

CIC/No Termination

            $891,028           $891,028 

Ms. Allen (JIB President)

            

Termination Reason

            
Voluntary/Involuntary Termination  $515,000                     $515,000 

Death

            $1,453,353           $1,453,353 

Disability

            $1,181,342           $1,181,342 

CIC/Qualifying Termination

  $929,152 (7)  $1,185,144  $122,448   $1,741,483           $3,978,227 

CIC/No Termination

            $738,196           $738,196 

Mr. Guilbault (Qdoba President)

            

Termination Reason

            
Voluntary/Involuntary Termination                $387,445       $387,445 

Death

            $616,066   $387,445       $1,003,511 

Disability

            $524,177   $387,445       $911,622 

CIC/Qualifying Termination

  $864,690 (7)  $740,860  $21,283   $761,293   $387,445       $2,775,571 

CIC/No Termination

            $324,915         $324,915 

Qdoba CIC/Qualifying Termination (8)

  $651,161  $740,860  $21,283   $761,293   $387,445     $2,562,042 

Qdoba CIC/No Termination (8a)

  $187,500         $761,293           $948,793 

Mr. Rudolph (CLO)

            

Termination Reason

            
Voluntary/Involuntary Termination                $335,935       $335,935 

Death

            $5,157,105   $335,935       $5,493,040 

Disability

            $4,864,087   $335,935       $5,200,022 

CIC/Qualifying Termination

  $1,280,000  $1,178,987  $35,393   $5,439,206   $335,935       $8,269,521 

CIC/No Termination

            $4,362,117           $4,362,117 

(1)

Lump Sum Cash Payment (“Cash Payment”):: ForThe amounts in this column reflect (a) for all NEOs, except Ms. Hooper, the cash payment amount equal to a multiple of annual base salary under the Executive Severance Plan, as described in the Termination of Service section VII.f above (the “Non-CIC Section”), and (b) for all NEOs, except Ms. Hooper who does not have a CIC agreement, amounts shown in the table for a CIC/Qualifying Termination reflect a multiple of annual base salary under the CIC Agreement, as described in the Compensation and Benefits Assurance Agreements section VII.g. (“CIC Section”) above. In the case of Ms. Allen, the amount shown in the table for a termination not related to a CIC represents the one year base salary she is entitled to for termination without cause pursuant to her employment offer letter.

(2)

Annual IncentiveIncentive:: Reflects multiple of annual incentive under the Executive Severance Plan as described in the Non-CIC Section and the CIC Section.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT63


(3)

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

(3)

Continuation of BenefitsBenefits:: Reflects benefits continuation under the Executive Severance Plan and CIC Agreements as described in the Non-CIC Section and the CIC section,Section, respectively, including with respect to the CIC Agreements, an outplacement fee estimate of $10,000; and with respect to the CIC Agreements 100% vesting of company restoration matching and supplemental contributions to the EDCP.

contribution.

(4)

Equity Incentive and Stock AwardsAwards:: The amounts shown in the table reflect only the value of unvested awards and options that would be accelerated upon termination and/or CIC as applicable; they do not include the vested portion of awards and options as of the end of fiscal 2017.2021. For Mr. Rebel, the only NEOGordon, who wasis retirement eligible at FYE 2017,2021, the value of his unvested equity that would be accelerated on termination (retirement), is shown in the “Voluntary/“Voluntary and Involuntary Termination” row. For a CIC, the amounts shown reflect only the amount of acceleration of unvested restricted stock awards and stock units, unvested performance shares, andin-the-money unvested stock options. All references to termination exclude terminations for cause.

a)
a)

Pre-2011 Stock Awards (RSA/RSU under the stock ownership program in place prior to fiscal 2011, for Messrs. Comma, Rebel and Rudolph only):

(i)

Upon termination not related to a CIC, if eligible to retire under a Company sponsored retirement plan, determination of shares vested is based on a schedule of the greater of: a) 30% of the award vesting three years from the date of grant, and 10% vesting for each year of service thereafter as of the date of retirement; b) such vesting as would have occurred had 10% of the award vested for each year of service with the Company, or c) in such greater amount as may be determined by the Board in its sole discretion.

(ii)

Upon termination not related to a CIC, and not eligible to retire under a Company sponsored retirement plan, determination of shares vested is based on a schedule of 15% vesting on or after three years from the grant date, and 5% vesting for each year of service thereafter as of the termination date.

(iii)

Upon death, disability, or a CIC, stock awards would vest 100%.

b)

Performance Shares (PSUs):

(i)
(i)

Upon termination not related to a CIC, if eligible to retire under a Company sponsored retirement plan or due to death or disability, and the awardee had been continuously employed by the Company as of the last dateday of the first fiscal year of the performance period, the performance shares would vest on a prorated basis, based on the number of full accounting periods the awardee was continuously employed by the Company during the performance period and to the extent to which performance goals are achieved.

(ii)
(ii)

Upon termination not related to a CIC (other than as described above), the award would be cancelled.

(iii)
(iii)

Upon a CIC, PSUs awarded prior to 2014 would vest and pay out at the greater of the performance level attained as of the date of the CIC or 100% of target, and PSUs granted in 2014 and thereafter would vest and pay out based on (A) actual achievement for completed fiscal years for which targets have been set and performance results measured and (B) at 100% of target for any incomplete fiscal years for which performance results are not known.

For the accelerated portion of PSUs for which performance was unknown as of the last day of fiscal 2017,2021, the amounts in the table assume that the PSUs will be accelerated based on target performance levels.

b)
c)

Time-vested RSUs:

(i)
(i)

Upon termination not related to a CIC, disability, or retirement, the award would be cancelled.

(ii)
(ii)

Upon death, disability or retirement, the RSUs would vest 100%.

(iii)
(iii)

Upon a CIC, RSUs awarded prior to 2014 would vest 100%, and RSUs awarded in 2014 and thereafter would vest only upon a Qualifying Termination.

Termination, unless not assumed by an acquirer.

c)
d)

Option Awards:

(i)
(i)

Upon termination not related to a CIC, and eligible to retire under a Company sponsored retirement plan, determination of shares vested is based on a formula of 5% additional vesting for each year of service with the Company.

(ii)
(ii)

Upon termination not related to a CIC, and not eligible to retire under a Company sponsored retirement plan, there is no acceleration of option awards.

(iii)
(iii)

Upon death, options would vest 100%.

(iv)
(iv)

Upon a CIC, where options are not assumed by the acquiring company, options awarded prior to 2014 would vest 100%, while those awarded in 2014 and thereafter would vest 100% only upon a Qualifying Termination related to the CIC.

(v)
(v)

Vesting upon disability is based on the number of shares which would have been vested as of twelve months following the optionee’s first day of absence from work with the Company, and therefore, for purposes of this table, no additional vesting is applied in the event of a disability.

(5)

Pension and SERPPension:: Annual benefit amounts listed for each NEOMr. Gordon and Ms. Hooper are subject to the eligibility and vesting provisions of the Retirement Plan, (Messrs. Comma, Rebel, Rudolph and Guilbault) and the SERP (Mr. Rebel), which are described above in the sections of this Proxy Statement titled Retirement Plan, Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Pension Benefits Table, and accompanying footnotes. All values shown represent present values and are based on the following:

a)
a)

In the event of a voluntary/involuntary termination (for any reason) or death, benefit values are based on accrued benefits as of fiscal year-end payable at normal retirement. Benefit values were calculated as of October 1, 2017,3, 2021, based on a discount rate of 3.988% for the qualified pension plan and 3.799% for the SERP.3.11%. TheRP-2014 Pri-2012 Mortality Table is used for bothwith the Retirement Plan and the SERP calculations (the SERP uses a white collar adjustment). Both Plans use theMP-2016MP-2020 generational scale projected from 2006, modified to use 15 year convergence to an ultimate rate of .75%. Under the SERP, which applies only to Mr. Rebel, in the event of death, the amount of the survivor benefit would be the greater of one times the participant’s compensation or the actuarial equivalent lump sum present value of the participant’s supplemental retirement benefit.2006. In the event of death while actively employed, the amount of the benefit under the Retirement Plan would be the accrued actuarial equivalent pension benefit as determined on the date of death. Such benefit is not subject to any reduction of benefits.

b)
b)

Disability benefits shown assume ana NEO terminates employment with the Company due to disability and remains continuously disabled until reaching normal retirement age. Benefit values are based on accrued benefits as of the NEOs normal retirement age and were calculated as of October 1, 20173, 2021 based on a discount rate of 3.988% for3.11% and the qualified pension plan and 3.799% for the SERP and theRP-2014Pri-2012 Mortality Table as described above.

c)
c)

In the event of an involuntary termination (or material diminution in duties or responsibilities or material downward change of title) within 24 months following a CIC, a participant would become 100% vested in the SERP. Benefitbenefit values are based on accrued benefits as of fiscal year-end and were calculated as of October 1, 2017. The SERP values are based on an interest rate of 6.0% and theRP-2000 Mortality Table, projected ten years.

3, 2021.

d)

As described in the“Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Section” above, all of the NEOs received a three percent Company match on their contributions made to thenon-qualified deferred compensation (EDCP) prior to January 1, 2016, and an annual restoration match of up to 4% for contributions made after January 1, 2016. In addition, Messrs. Comma, Rudolph, and Guilbault and Ms. Allen, who are not eligible to participate in the SERP, receive an additional 4% Company contribution to their EDCP accounts for up to ten years. In January 2017, Mr. Comma reached the maximum ten years to receive the additional 4% Company contribution to the EDCP and therefore ceased receiving these contributions at that time. As of the end of fiscal 2017, all the NEOs, except Ms. Allen, are 100% vested in the Company matching contributions. Accordingly, these amounts are not included here, but are described in the“Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Section” above.

Former NEOs
Former CIO64, Mr. Martin ceased to be an employee of the company in May 2021. In connection with his departure, and in exchange for entering into a separation and release agreement that includes a general release of claims against the Company, he received benefits under the Executive Severance Plan totaling $592,746, which represents 12 months of base pay ($366,000), 12 months of the employer portion of COBRA premiums ($8,623), a prorated annual incentive based on the Company’s fiscal 2021 performance ($201,798); and, the cash equivalent for a portion of shares that would have vested within six months of his separation date ($16,325).    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


JACK IN THE BOX INC.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION|  

2022 PROXY STATEMENT 73

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(6)

Gross-Up for Excise Tax: Nogross-up would be payable to any NEOs for termination at FYE 2017. While Mr. Rebel does have an agreement (entered into prior to 2009) that could provide for agross-up in the event of “excess parachute payments” under IRC Section 280G(b)(1) subject to excise tax, no suchgross-up would be triggered as of FYE 2017, applying calculations based on the value of all benefits that could have been received and characterized as contingent upon a CIC under IRC Section 280G and related regulations as of FY 2017, except for equity award acceleration which is calculated based on the assumption that the CIC occurred on December 31, 2017. For purposes of this calculation, the value of the acceleration of vesting of all outstanding equity awards is calculated according to Section 280G and the related regulations. Other than Mr. Rebel, all other NEOs have 2009 and later agreements under which nogross-up is provided in any circumstance.

(7)

The CIC Agreement “best after tax” provision applied to Mr. Comma at FYE 2017 would result in reducing his Cash Payment and a portion of his annual incentive payment so as to remain below the maximum amount he may receive without triggering an excise tax; the estimated reduction is $2,700,000 in his Cash Payment and a reduction of $619,250 in his annual incentive. The “best after tax” provision also applied to Ms. Allen and Mr. Guilbault and would result in reducing each of their Cash Payments. The estimated reduction is $358,348 for Ms. Allen and $72,810 for Mr. Guilbault. The net amounts are reflected in the Cash Payment and Annual Incentive columns for Mr. Comma, and the Cash Payment column for Ms. Allen and Mr. Guilbault.

(8)

Under the terms of Mr. Guilbault’s Qdoba CIC Agreement (described in the section above the table): in the event of a Qdoba CIC and his qualifying termination, Mr. Guilbault would receive a Cash Payment based on a multiple of annual base salary under the Qdoba CIC Agreement and additional payments for annual incentive, an equivalent value of the unvested portion of his equity, and other benefits as shown in those columns. The Cash Payment column also includes a $187,500 conditional bonus to which Mr. Guilbault is entitled contingent on continuous employment with the Company and satisfactory performance through the earlier of (a) January 2, 2018 or (b) the consummation of a sale orspin-off of Qdoba. The “best after tax” provision applied to Mr. Guilbault would result in reducing his Cash Payment amount so as to remain below the maximum amount he may receive without triggering an excise tax; the estimated reduction is $473,839 and net amount is shown in the column.

(8a)

This row represents the benefits Mr. Guilbault would receive upon a Qdoba CIC absent a qualifying termination: the conditional bonus described in Note 8 above and the equivalent value of the unvested portion of his equity.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT65


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN

BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following tables set forth, as of December 29, 2017 (“the RecordJanuary 7, 2022 (the “Record Date”), information with respect to beneficial ownership of our Common Stock by (i) each person who we know to beneficially own more than 5% of our Common Stock, (ii) each director and nominee for director of the Company, (iii) each NEO listed in the Summary Compensation Table herein and (iv) all of our directors and executive officers (employed as of the Record Date) of the Company as a group. The address of each director and executive officer shown in the table below is c/o Jack in the Box Inc., 9330 Balboa Avenue,9357 Spectrum Center Blvd., San Diego, CA 92123.

We determined the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by each person under rules promulgated by the SEC, based on information obtained from questionnaires, Company records and filings with the SEC. The information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual or entity has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which the individual or entity had the right to acquire within sixty days of December 29, 2017.January 7, 2022. All percentages are based on the shares of Common Stock outstanding as of December 29, 2017.January 7, 2022. Except as noted below, each holder has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock listed as beneficially owned by that holder.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

Name  Number of Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned as of
December 29, 2017
   Percent
of Class
 

BlackRock, Inc. (1)

   3,064,242    10.4% 

The Vanguard Group, Inc. (2)

   2,431,268    8.2% 

Name
Number of Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned as of
January 7, 2022
Percent
of Class
BlackRock Inc.(1)
2,391,059
11.33%
Vanguard Group Inc.(2)
2,095,185
9.93%
Franklin Resources Inc.(3)
1,759,872
8.34%
(1)

According to its Form 13F filings as of September 30, 2017,2021, BlackRock Inc. had sole investment discretion with respect to accounts holding 3,064,2422,391,059 shares, of which it had sole voting powerauthority with respect to 3,000,7362,329,506 shares and no voting powerauthority with respect to 63,506 shares.61,553 shares . The address of BlackRock Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York NY 10055.

(2)

According to its Form 13F filings as of September 30, 2017, The2021, Vanguard Group Inc., on behalf of itself and its direct subsidiaries, Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Co, and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., and Vanguard Global Advisers, LLC had investment discretion with respect to accounts holding 2,431,2682,095,185 shares. The Vanguard Group Inc. was the beneficial owner of 2,376,9092,053,173 shares, of which it had sole voting power with respect to 2,309 shares and no voting power with respect to 2,374,600 shares.authority. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Co was the beneficial owner of 50,40917,447 shares, of which it had soleshared voting power. Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. was the beneficial owner of 3,9505,407 shares, of which it had shared voting power. Vanguard Global Advisers, LLC. was the beneficial owner of 19,158 shares, of which it had no voting power. The address of The Vanguard Group, Inc. is:is P.O. Box 2600 Valley Forge, Pennsylvania 19482-2600.

66    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT

(3)
According to its Form 13F filings as of September 30, 2021, Franklin Resources Inc. on behalf of itself and its direct subsidiaries, Fiduciary Trust Co International, Fiduciary Trust International, LLC, Franklin Advisers, Inc., and Franklin Mutual Advisers, LLC had investment discretion with respect to accounts holding 1,759,872 shares. Fiduciary Trust Co. International was the beneficial owner of 16 shares, of which it had sole voting authority. Fiduciary Trust International, LLC was the beneficial owner of 15 shares, of which it had sole voting power. Franklin Advisers, Inc. was the beneficial owner of 8,905 shares, of which it had sole voting power of 8,815 shares and no voting power with respect to 90 shares. Franklin Mutual Advisers, LLC was the beneficial owner of 1,750,936 shares, of which it had sole voting power of 1,665,389 shares and no voting power with respect to 85,547 shares. The address of Franklin Resources Inc. is One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, CA 94403.


74 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Security Ownership Ofof Directors and Management

Name  Number of Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned as of
December 29, 2017(1)
   Number Attributable to
Options Exercisable
Within 60 Days of
December 29, 2017
   Percent
of Class
 

Mr. Comma

   169,070    88,545    *   

Mr. Rebel

   167,610    57,354    *   

Ms. Allen

   25,159    18,123    *   

Mr. Guilbault

   25,492    8,447    *   

Mr. Rudolph

   124,881    28,967    *   

Mr. Goebel

   21,085    0    *   

Ms. John

   3,390    0    *   

Ms. Kleiner

   13,188    0    *   

Mr. Murphy

   61,317    0    *   

Mr. Myers

   16,072    0    *   

Mr. Tehle

   49,984    0    *   

Mr. Wyatt

   15,648    0    *   

Ms. Yeung

   0    0    *    

All directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons)

   792,515    243,510    2.6% 

Name
Shares(1)
Direct
Holdings
RSUs
Acquirable
and
Options
Exercisable
Within 60
Days(2)
Deferred
Stock
Equivalents /
Units(4)
Unvested
RSUs(5)
Total Shares
Beneficially
Owned
Percent of
Class(6)
Mr. Harris
3,463
3,463
*
Mr. Mullany
1,493
1,493
*
Ms. Hooper
1,015
1,015
*
Mr. Ostrom
793
793
*
Mr. Piano
*
Mr. Gordon
4,797
11,249
1,676
17,722
*
Mr. Goebel
6,667
14,848
1,288
22,803
*
Ms. John
2,433
4,539
859
7,831
*
Ms. Kleiner
6,556
10,287
859
17,702
*
Mr. Murphy
66,713
859
67,572
*
Mr. Myers
5,843
18,247
859
24,949
*
Mr. Tehle
6,872
49,067
859
56,798
*
Ms. Yeung
7,118
859
7,977
*
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (17 persons)
39,039
16,205
170,819
8,118
234,181
1.1%
*

Asterisk in the percent of class column indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1%

(1)

Represents the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned on January 7, 2022.
(2)
Represents RSUs that vest within 60 days from January 7, 2022 and options that were exercisable on January 7, 2022 and options that become exercisable within 60 days of January 7, 2022.
(4)
Represents (i) Common Stock equivalents attributed to cash compensation deferred under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan and (ii) deferred RSUs and related dividends. (As described in the Director Compensation section of this Proxy Statement, these deferrals are convertible on a one-for-one basis into shares of Common Stock upon a director’s termination of service.)
(5)
Represents (a) for retirement-eligible executive officers, RSUs that fully vest upon termination of service and are convertible on a one-for-one basis into shares of Common Stock upon vesting, and (b) for directors, RSUs that fully vest upon the earlier of 12 months from the date of grant or upon termination of service.
(6)
For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares held by each person or group of persons named in the Beneficial Ownership table on a given date, any security which such person or persons has the right to acquire within 60 days after such date is deemed to be outstanding, but is not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The securities totaled in this column include stock options, direct holdings, stock equivalents under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan, restricted stock and restricted stock units as described below.

Direct Holdings and Restricted Stock — As a group, within 60 days of December 29, 2017, our directors, NEOs and other executive officers’ shares include (a) 243,086 shares directly held by directors and officers and (b) 95,815 restricted stock awards held by NEOs, which shares may be voted, but are not available for sale or other disposition until the expiration of vesting restrictions, which occurs upon each individual’s termination of service.

NameDirect HoldingsRestricted Stock

Mr. Comma

63,645

Mr. Rebel

41,22562,572

Ms. Allen

7,036

Mr. Guilbault

15,005

Mr. Rudolph

28,34533,243

Mr. Goebel

15,380

Ms. John

2,433

Ms. Kleiner

6,556

Mr. Murphy

669

Mr. Myers

5,843

Mr. Tehle

2,520

Mr. Wyatt

6,044

Ms. Yeung

0

All other executive officers

48,385
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 75

Stock Options — As a group, within 60 days of December 29, 2017, our directors, NEOs and other executive officers have the right to acquire through the exercise of stock options, 243,510 of the shares of Common Stock reflected in the Beneficial Ownership table

Common Stock Equivalents — The shares of our directors reflected as beneficially owned include an aggregate of 88,896 Common Stock equivalents attributed to cash compensation deferred under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan and deferred RSUs, and related dividends, as described in the Director Compensation section of this Proxy Statement. These Common Stock equivalents are convertible on aone-for-one basis into shares of Common Stock upon the director’s termination of service.

Name

Stock Equivalents

for Directors

Mr. Goebel

2,415

Ms. John

0

Ms. Kleiner

28

Mr. Murphy

48,220

Mr. Myers

6,315

Mr. Tehle

31,867

Mr. Wyatt

51

Ms. Yeung

0

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL FOUR — AMENDMENT TO JACK IN THE BOX INC. 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
PROPOSAL FOUR — AMENDMENT TO JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT67

2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN TO EXTEND DATE BY WHICH AWARDS MAY BE GRANTED THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2022


  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT  

Restricted Stock Units — As a group, within 60 days of December 29, 2017, our directors, NEOs and other executive officers may convert an aggregate of 121,208 RSUs on aone-for-one basis into shares of Common Stock upon vesting. RSUs may not be voted. The breakdown between directors and NEOs is provided below.

We are asking the Company’s stockholders to approve an amendment to the Jack in the Box Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) to extend the date by which awards may be granted under the 2004 Plan (which we refer to in this Proxy Statement as the “term” of the 2004 Plan) from November 16, 2021 through December 31, 2022 (such amendment, the “2004 Plan Amendment”). The extension of the term is the only proposed amendment to the 2004 Plan. Stockholders are not being asked to approve an increase in the number of shares available for issuance under the 2004 Plan or any other amendment to the 2004 Plan.

RSUs of Directors — These RSUs fully vest upon the earlier of 12 months from the date of grant or upon termination of service with the Board.

Our stockholders’ approval of this Proposal Four will allow us to continue to grant equity incentive awards at levels determined appropriate by the Board or Compensation Committee. If our stockholders do not approve this Proposal Four, we will not be able to grant any equity incentive awards to our current employees, directors and consultants, which would significantly impact our ability to motivate and retain such individuals and to provide long-term incentives that align the interests of such individuals with the interests of our stockholders.
On December 16, 2021, the Compensation Committee approved (1) the 2004 Plan Amendment, and (ii) for a grant date of March 4, 2022, a total of 73,414 shares subject to awards of restricted stock units and a total of 37,822 shares subject to awards of performance shares to the Company’s executive officers and certain non-executive officer leadership level employees. The Compensation Committee’s approval of the 2004 Plan Amendment and such awards were made subject to stockholder approval of the 2004 Plan Amendment. The following table sets forth the number of shares subject to the awards of restricted stock units and performance shares that were approved on December 16, 2021, under the 2004 Plan to each of the Company’s named executive officers currently serving, current executive officers, as a group, and all other employees who are not executive officers, as a group.
Name
Restricted Stock
Units (RSUs)
Performance Shares
(PSUs)
Darin S. Harris, Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
16,581
16,581
Timothy E. Mullany, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
3,782
3,782
Ryan L. Ostrom, Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer (CMO)
3,491
3,491
Dean C. Gordon, Senior Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer (CSCO)
2,328
2,328
Steven Piano, Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer (CPO)
2,328
2,328
All current executive officers, as a group
37,822
37,822
All other employees, as a group
35,592
0
Total
73,414
37,822
When considering the vote to approve this Proposal Four, you should be aware that our executive officers have interests in this Proposal Four that are different from, or in addition to, those of our stockholders, generally. Each of the persons and groups listed in the table above has an interest in this Proposal Four in respect of the restricted stock units and performance shares so awarded if this Proposal Four is approved by our stockholders.
Under the 2004 Plan, up to 11,600,000 shares of Common Stock have been authorized to be reserved for issuance to satisfy grants of equity incentive awards to eligible participants, subject to adjustment for certain changes in our capitalization. As of December 15, 2021, there were approximately 1,759,383 shares remaining available for grant under the 2004 Plan. The approval of the grants of restricted stock units and performance shares listed in the table above was made on December 16, 2021, subject to stockholder approval of this Proposal Four.
We believe that equity incentive awards are a vital part of our overall compensation program, and we grant awards to motivate and retain our leadership. However, we recognize that this compensation philosophy dilutes existing stockholders, and, therefore, we must responsibly manage the growth of our equity compensation program. We are committed to monitoring our equity compensation share reserve carefully, including our “burn rate,” to ensure that we maximize stockholders’ value by granting the appropriate number of awards necessary to attract, retain and motivate our employees, directors and consultants.
NameUnvested
RSUs
Deferred
RSUs

Mr. Goebel

9572,333

Ms. John

9570

Ms. Kleiner

9575,647

Mr. Murphy

95711,471

Mr. Myers

9572,957

Mr. Tehle

95714,640

Mr. Wyatt

9578,596

Ms. Yeung

00
76 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RSUs of NEOs and other executive officers

PROPOSAL FOURThese RSUs fully vest upon termination of service and are convertible on aone-for-one basis into shares of Common Stock upon vesting. Also included are deferred performance vested restricted stock units in the amount of 3,000 for Mr. Comma and 2,040 for Mr. Guilbault.

AMENDMENT TO JACK IN THE BOX INC. 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

Description of Amended 2004 Plan
The material features of the 2004 Plan, as amended by the 2004 Plan Amendment (the “Amended 2004 Plan”), are summarized below. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Amended 2004 Plan, which is appended to this Proxy Statement as Appendix B and may be accessed from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Purpose of the Amended 2004 Plan. The purpose of the Amended 2004 Plan is to advance the interests of the Company by providing an incentive program that will enable the Company to attract, retain, and motivate employees, consultants and directors upon whose judgment, interest and efforts the Company’s success is dependent, and to provide them with an equity interest in the success of the Company in order to motivate superior performance. These incentives may be provided through the grant of stock options (including indexed options), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock purchase rights, restricted stock bonuses, restricted stock units, performance shares, and performance units.
Key Features of the Amended 2004 Plan Designed to Protect Stockholders’ Interests. The Amended 2004 Plan includes provisions that reflect our commitment to strong corporate governance and the desire to preserve stockholder value as demonstrated by the following features:
No Evergreen Feature. The maximum number of shares available for issuance under the Amended 2004 Plan is fixed and cannot be increased without stockholder approval. In addition, unless further extended by a vote of our stockholders, no awards may be granted under the Amended 2004 Plan after December 31, 2022.
Repricing Prohibited. Stockholder approval is required for any repricing, replacement, or buyout of underwater awards.
No Discount Awards; Maximum Term Specified. Stock options and stock appreciation rights generally must have an exercise price no less than the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date the award is granted and, starting in November 2009, a term no longer than seven years from the date of grant.
Per-Employee Limits on Awards. The Amended 2004 Plan limits the size of awards that may be granted to any one employee within any fiscal year of the Company.
Minimum Three-Year Vesting Period. Restricted shares and RSUs granted to employees and vesting solely on the basis of continued service require a minimum three years of employment, from date of grant, to vest (with the exception of a maximum of 10% of the total shares being available for full value awards with a vesting period of less than three years).
Award Design Flexibility. Different kinds of awards may be granted under the Amended 2004 Plan, giving the
Company the flexibility to design our equity incentives to complement the other elements of compensation and to support our attainment of strategic goals.
Performance-Based Awards. The Amended 2004 Plan permits the grant of performance-based stock awards that are payable upon the attainment of specified performance goals.
Responsible Share Counting. Any shares of common stock tendered or withheld to pay taxes or an option’s exercise price are not available for re-issuance.
Responsible Change in Control Provisions. The Amended 2004 Plan’s definition of a change-in-control transaction provides that any award benefits triggered by such a transaction are contingent upon the actual consummation of the transaction, not merely its approval by our Board or stockholders. Additionally, since 2014, all grants of options and restricted stock units provide that unvested awards that continue after a “Change in Control” (as defined below) are “double-trigger”, requiring both a Change in Control and qualifying termination of service for vesting to accelerate. Since 2014, the terms of performance awards provide for vesting upon a Change in Control that pays out at actual levels achieved for completed performance periods and at target level for incomplete periods.
Independent Committee. The Amended 2004 Plan is administered by our Compensation Committee or other committee of the Board as duly appointed to administer the Amended 2004 Plan.
Share Reserve. As of December 16, 2021, of the shares of our common stock approved for issuance under the Amended 2004 Plan, 54,596 shares are subject to issuance or release under outstanding awards and 1,752,610 shares of our common stock remain available for future awards (not including any shares that might in the future be returned to the Amended 2004 Plan as a result of awards expiring, being forfeited or otherwise terminating).
The Amended 2004 Plan provides that grants or settlement of full value awards (such as restricted stock bonus awards, restricted stock purchase rights, restricted stock units, performance shares or performance units settled in shares) made on or after February 10, 2010 are counted against the Amended 2004 Plan’s share reserve on a one-and-three-quarters-for-one basis (i.e., each full value award is counted against the share limit as 1.75 shares). If any award expires, lapses or otherwise terminates or is forfeited for any reason without having been exercised or settled in full, the shares subject to the award will again become available for issuance under the Amended 2004 Plan. To the extent a share that was subject to an Award that counted as one share is returned to the Amended 2004 Plan, the share reserve will be credited with one share. To the extent that a share that was subject to
NameRSUs

Mr. Comma

16,880

Mr. Rebel

6,459

Ms. Allen

0

Mr. Guilbault

2,040

Mr. Rudolph

34,326

All other executive officers

9,160
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 77

TABLE OF CONTENTS

68    JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï   2018 PROXY STATEMENT


PROPOSAL FOUR — AMENDMENT TO JACK IN THE BOX INC. 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

  OTHER INFORMATION   

OTHER INFORMATION

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Pursuant

an Award that counts as 1.75 shares is returned to Section 16(a)the Amended 2004 Plan, the share reserve will be credited with 1.75 shares. Upon any stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, recapitalization, or similar change in our capital structure, appropriate adjustments will be made to the shares subject to the Amended 2004 Plan, to the award grant limitations, and to all outstanding awards.
Administration. The Amended 2004 Plan has been and will continue to be administered by the Compensation Committee or other Committee of the Securities Exchange ActBoard of 1934, eachDirectors duly appointed to administer the Amended 2004 Plan, or, in the absence of such committee, by the Board of Directors. In the case of awards intended to qualify for the performance-based compensation exemption under Section 162(m), administration must be by a compensation committee comprised solely of two or more “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m). (For purposes of this summary, the term “Committee” will refer to either such duly appointed committee or to the Board of Directors.) Subject to the provisions of the Amended 2004 Plan, the Committee determines in its discretion the persons to whom and the times at which awards are granted, the types and sizes of such awards, and all of their terms and conditions. The Committee may, subject to certain limitations on the exercise of its discretion required by Section 162(m) and the repricing and vesting restrictions described below, amend, cancel, renew, waive any restrictions or conditions applicable to any award, and accelerate, continue, extend or defer the vesting of any award. The Amended 2004 Plan provides, subject to certain limitations, for indemnification by the Company of any director, officer, or employee against all reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, incurred in connection with any legal action arising from such person’s action or failure to act in administering the Amended 2004 Plan. The Committee will interpret the Amended 2004 Plan and awards granted thereunder, and all determinations of the Committee will be final and binding on all persons having an interest in the Amended 2004 Plan or any award.
Eligibility. Awards may be granted to employees, directors and consultants of the Company or of any present or future parent or subsidiary corporations of the Company. Incentive stock options may be granted only to employees who, as of the time of grant, are employees of the Company or any parent or subsidiary corporation of the Company.
As of January 7, 2022, the Company and its subsidiary corporations had a total of approximately 5,200 employees, including nine executive officer, each director,officers, seven non-management directors and each beneficial owner30 consultants.
Repricing and Vesting Restrictions. The Amended 2004 Plan forbids, without stockholder approval, the repricing of any outstanding stock option and/or stock appreciation right. In addition, the Amended 2004 Plan forbids (1) any acceleration of vesting of awards by the Committee for any reason other than upon a Change in Control or after a participant’s death,
retirement or disability, (2) vesting of full value shares on the basis of continued service any more rapidly than annual pro rata vesting over three years (with the exception of no more than 10% of the Company’stotal shares being available for full value awards that have a vesting period of less than three years) and (3) vesting on the basis of performance over a performance period of less than 12 months.
Stock Options. Each option granted under the Amended 2004 Plan must be evidenced by a written agreement between the Company and the optionee specifying the number of shares subject to the option and the other terms and conditions of the option, consistent with the requirements of the Amended 2004 Plan. The exercise price of each option may not be less than the fair market value of a share of Common Stock is requiredon the date of grant. However, any incentive stock option granted to file certain forms witha person who at the SEC. A reporttime of beneficial ownershipgrant owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any parent or subsidiary corporation of the Company (a “Ten Percent Stockholder”) must have an exercise price equal to at least 110% of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant. The exercise price of each indexed stock option, and the terms and adjustments which may be made to such an option, will be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion at the time of grant.
On January 7, 2022, the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on Form 3the NASDAQ stock market was $89.37 per share.
Subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of any change in the capital structure of the Company, no employee may be granted in any fiscal year of the Company options and/or freestanding stock appreciation rights which in the aggregate are for more than 500,000 shares.
The Amended 2004 Plan provides that the option exercise price may be paid in cash, by check, or in cash equivalent, by the assignment of the proceeds of a sale with respect to some or all of the shares being acquired upon the exercise of the option, to the extent legally permitted, by tender of shares of Common Stock owned by the optionee having a fair market value not less than the exercise price, by such other lawful consideration as approved by the Committee, or by any combination of these. Nevertheless, the Committee may restrict the forms of payment permitted in connection with any option grant. No option may be exercised unless the optionee has made adequate provision for federal, state, local and foreign taxes, if any, relating to the exercise of the option, including, if permitted or required by the Company, through the optionee’s surrender of a portion of the option shares to the Company.
Options will become vested and exercisable at such times or upon such events and subject to such terms, conditions, performance criteria or restrictions as specified by the
78 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL FOUR — AMENDMENT TO JACK IN THE BOX INC. 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
Committee. The maximum term of any option granted before November 12, 2009 under the Amended 2004 Plan is dueten years, and the maximum term of any option granted on or after November 12, 2009 under the Amended 2004 Plan is seven years, provided, however, that an incentive stock option granted to a Ten Percent Stockholder must have a term not exceeding five years. The Committee will specify in each written option agreement, and solely in its discretion, the period of time post-termination that an optionee may exercise the option before it expires.
Stock options are nontransferable by the optionee other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and are exercisable during the optionee’s lifetime only by the optionee. However, a nonstatutory stock option may be assigned or transferred to the extent permitted by the Committee and set forth in the option agreement, subject to applicable limitations of securities law.
Stock Appreciation Rights. Each stock appreciation right granted under the Amended 2004 Plan must be evidenced by a written agreement between the Company and the participant specifying the number of shares subject to the award and the other terms and conditions of the award, consistent with the requirements of the Amended 2004 Plan. A stock appreciation right gives a participant the right to receive the appreciation in the fair market value of Company Common Stock between the date of grant of the award and the date of its exercise. The Company may pay the appreciation either in cash, in shares of Common Stock or in any combination thereof as set out in the award agreement. The Committee may grant stock appreciation rights under the Amended 2004 Plan in tandem with a related stock option or as a freestanding award. A tandem stock appreciation right is exercisable only at the time and to the same extent that the related option is exercisable, and its exercise causes the related option to be canceled. Freestanding stock appreciation rights vest and become exercisable at the times and on the terms established by the Committee. The maximum term of any stock appreciation right granted before November 12, 2009 under the Amended 2004 Plan is ten years, and the maximum term of any stock appreciation right granted on or after November 12, 2009 under the Amended 2004 Plan is seven years. Subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of any change in the capital structure of the Company, no employee may be granted in any fiscal year of the Company freestanding stock appreciation rights and/or options which in the aggregate are for more than 500,000 shares. Stock appreciation rights are nontransferable by the participant other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and are exercisable during the participant’s lifetime only by the participant.
Restricted Stock Awards. The Committee may grant restricted stock awards under the Amended 2004 Plan, either in the form of a restricted stock purchase right, giving a participant an immediate right to purchase Common Stock, or
in the form of a restricted stock bonus, for which the participant furnishes consideration in the form of services to the Company. The Committee determines the purchase price, if any, payable under restricted stock purchase awards. Restricted stock awards may be subject to vesting conditions based on such person becomes

service or performance criteria as the Committee specifies, and the shares acquired may not be transferred by the participant until vested, other than pursuant to an ownership change event as described in the Amended 2004 Plan. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, a participant will forfeit any shares of restricted stock as to which the restrictions have not lapsed prior to the participant’s termination of service. Participants holding restricted stock will have the right to vote the shares and to receive any dividends paid, except that dividends or other distributions paid in shares will be subject to the reporting requirements andsame restrictions as the original award.

The Committee also may grant restricted stock awards under the Amended 2004 Plan in the form of restricted stock units which represent a report on Form 4right to receive shares of Common Stock at a future date determined in accordance with the participant’s award agreement. No monetary payment is required for receipt of restricted stock units or Form 5 must be filedthe shares issued in settlement of the award, the consideration for which is furnished in the form of the participant’s services to reflect changes thereafter. Based on written statements and copies of forms provided to us by personsthe Company. The Committee may grant restricted stock unit awards subject to the attainment of performance goals similar to those described below in connection with performance shares and performance units, or may make the awards subject to vesting conditions similar to those applicable to other restricted stock awards. Participants have no voting rights or rights to receive dividends with respect to restricted stock unit awards until shares of Common Stock are issued in settlement of such awards. However, the Committee may grant restricted stock units that entitle their holders to receive dividend equivalents, which are rights to receive additional restricted stock units for a number of shares whose value is equal to any dividends we pay. Dividend equivalents shall only be payable to the extent the Participant’s right to any stock is nonforfeitable. Subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of any change in the capital structure of the Company, no employee may be granted in any fiscal year of the Company restricted stock awards in the aggregate for more than 200,000 shares of stock on which the restrictions are based on performance criteria.
Performance Awards. The Committee may grant performance awards subject to such conditions and the attainment of such performance goals over such periods as the Committee determines in writing and sets forth in a written agreement between the Company and the participant. These awards may be designated as performance shares or performance units. The PSUs granted to executive officers as part of our long-term incentive program fit within the definition of performance shares under the Amended 2004 Plan.
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 79

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL FOUR — AMENDMENT TO JACK IN THE BOX INC. 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
Performance shares and performance units represent a right to receive a share of common stock, an equivalent amount of cash, or a combination of shares and cash as determined by the Committee, if vesting conditions are satisfied. The initial values of such awards are equal to the fair market value of a share of stock on the grant date and $100 per unit, respectively.
Performance awards will specify a predetermined amount of performance shares or performance units that may be earned by the participant to the extent that one or more predetermined performance goals are attained within a predetermined performance period. Subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of any change in the capital structure of the Company, for each fiscal year of the Company contained in the applicable performance period, no employee may be granted performance shares that could result in the employee receiving more than 200,000 shares of Common Stock or performance units that could result in the employee receiving more than $1,000,000.
Prior to the beginning of the applicable performance period, the Committee will establish one or more performance goals applicable to the award. Performance goals will be based on the attainment of specified target levels with respect to one or more measures of business or financial performance of the Company and each parent and subsidiary corporation consolidated therewith for financial reporting purposes, or such division or business unit of the Company as may be selected by the Committee. The Committee, in its discretion, may base performance goals on one or more of the following such measures: sales, revenue, gross margin, operating margin, operating income, pre-tax profit, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and/or amortization, net earnings, net income, cash flow, expenses, expense management, stock price, earnings per share, operating earnings per share, defined operating earnings per share, average unit sales or volume, return on stockholders’ equity, return on capital, return on assets, return on invested capital, economic value added, number of customers, market share, same store sales, average restaurant margin, restaurant operating margin, return on investment, profit after tax, customer satisfaction, guest transactions, number of restaurants franchised, number of restaurants remodeled or reimaged, franchise revenues, gains on restaurants sold, cash proceeds on restaurants sold, return on equity, cash on cash return, and system-wide sales. The target levels with respect to these performance measures may be expressed on an absolute basis or relative to a standard specified by the Committee. The degree of attainment of performance measures will, according to criteria established by the Committee, be computed before the effect of changes in accounting standards, restructuring charges and similar extraordinary items occurring after the establishment of the performance goals applicable to a performance award.
The Committee may also provide that one or more of the following objectively determinable adjustments shall be made
to one or more of the performance goals: items related to a change in accounting principle; items relating to financing activities; expenses for restructuring or productivity initiatives; other non-operating items; items related to acquisitions; items attributable to the business operations of any entity acquired by the Company during the performance period; items related to the disposal of a business or segment of a business; items related to discontinued operations that do not qualify as a segment of a business under United States generally accepted accounting principles; items attributable to any stock dividend, stock split, combination or exchange of shares occurring during the performance period; any other items of significant income or expense which are determined to be appropriate adjustments; items relating to unusual or extraordinary corporate transactions, events or developments; items related to amortization of acquired intangible assets; items that are outside the scope of the Company’s core, on-going business activities; or items relating to any other unusual or nonrecurring events or changes in applicable laws, accounting principles or business conditions.
Following completion of the applicable performance period, the Committee will certify in writing the extent to which the applicable performance goals have been attained and the resulting value to be paid to the participant. The Committee retains the discretion to eliminate or reduce, but not increase, the amount that would otherwise be payable to the participant on the basis of the performance goals attained. However, no such reduction may increase the amount paid to any other participant. In its discretion, the Committee may provide for the payment to a participant awarded performance shares of dividend equivalents with respect to dividends paid on the Company’s Common Stock, however, dividend equivalents shall only be payable to the extent the Participant’s right to any performance award is earned and nonforfeitable.
Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, if a participant’s service terminates due to the participant’s death, disability or retirement prior to completion of the applicable performance period, the final award value will be determined at the end of the performance period on the basis of the performance goals attained during the entire performance period but will be prorated for the number of months of the participant’s service during the performance period. If a participant’s service terminates prior to completion of the applicable performance period for any other reason, the Amended 2004 Plan provides that, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the performance award will be forfeited. No performance award may be sold or transferred other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution prior to the end of the applicable performance period.
Change in Control. The Amended 2004 Plan defines a “Change in Control” of the Company as any of the following events upon which the stockholders of the Company immediately before the event do not retain immediately after the event (in substantially the same proportions as their
80 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL FOUR — AMENDMENT TO JACK IN THE BOX INC. 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
ownership of shares of the Company’s voting stock immediately before the event) direct or indirect beneficial ownership of a majority of the total combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company, its successor, or, in the case of (iii) below, the corporation or corporations to which the assets were transferred: (i) a sale or exchange by the stockholders in a single or series of related transactions of more than 50% of the Company’s voting stock; (ii) a merger or consolidation in which the Company is a party; (iii) the sale, exchange or transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; or (iv) a liquidation or dissolution of the Company. If a Change in Control occurs, the surviving, continuing successor or purchasing corporation or parent corporation thereof may either assume outstanding options or stock appreciation rights or substitute new awards having an equivalent value.
In the event of a Change in Control, in which the outstanding stock options and stock appreciation rights are not assumed or replaced, then all unexercisable, unvested or unpaid portions of such outstanding awards will become exercisable, vested and payable in full prior to the date of the Change in Control. Since 2014, however, all grants of stock options that continue after a Change in Control are “double trigger,” requiring both a Change in Control and a qualifying termination of service for vesting to accelerate.
In the event of a Change in Control, the lapsing of all vesting conditions and restrictions on any shares subject to any restricted stock award, restricted stock unit award or performance award held by a participant whose service with the Company has not terminated prior to the Change in Control may be accelerated effective as of the date of the Change in Control, subject to the terms of the applicable grant agreement. Since 2014, all grants of restricted stock that continue after a Change in Control are “double trigger,” requiring both a Change in Control and a qualifying termination of service for stock vesting to accelerate. Since 2014, all performance award grant agreements provide that the value of
outstanding performance awards will be determined and paid at (i) the degree of attainment of the applicable performance goals for the completed performance periods prior to the date of the Change in Control and (ii) 100% of the pre-established performance goal target for incomplete periods.
Any option or stock appreciation right not assumed, replaced, or exercised as of the date of the Change in Control will terminate. The Amended 2004 Plan authorizes the Committee, in its discretion, to provide for different treatment of any award, as may be specified in such award’s written agreement, which may provide for acceleration of the vesting or settlement of any award, or provide for longer periods of exercisability, upon a Change in Control.
Termination or Amendment. The Amended 2004 Plan will continue in effect until the first to occur of (i) its termination by the Committee or (ii) the date on which all shares available for issuance under the Amended 2004 Plan have been issued and all restrictions on such shares under the terms of the Amended 2004 Plan and the agreements evidencing awards granted under the Amended 2004 Plan have lapsed. Unless further extended by a vote of our stockholders, no awards may be granted under the Amended 2004 Plan after December 31, 2022. The Committee may terminate or amend the Amended 2004 Plan at any time, provided that no amendment may be made without stockholder approval if the Committee deems such approval necessary for compliance with any applicable tax or securities law or other regulatory requirements, including the requirements of any stock exchange or market system on which the Common Stock of the Company is then listed. No termination or amendment may affect any outstanding award unless expressly provided by the Committee, and, in any event, may not adversely affect an outstanding award without the consent of the participant unless required to enable an option designated as an incentive stock option to qualify as such or necessary to comply with any applicable law, regulation or rule.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a summary of the principal United States federal income tax consequences to participants and us with respect to participation in the Amended 2004 Plan. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive and does not discuss the income tax laws of any local, state or foreign jurisdiction in which a participant may reside. The information is based upon current federal income tax rules and therefore is subject to change when those rules change. Because the tax consequences to any participant may depend on his or her particular situation, each participant should consult the participant’s tax adviser regarding the federal, state, local and other tax consequences of the grant, exercise or settlement of an award or the disposition of shares acquired under the Amended 2004 Plan. The Amended 2004 Plan is not qualified under the provisions of Section 401(a) of the Code and is not
subject to any of the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. Our ability to realize the benefit of any tax deductions described below depends on our generation of taxable income as well as the requirement of reasonableness, the provisions of IRC Section 162(m) and the satisfaction of our tax reporting obligations.
Nonstatutory Stock Options. Generally, there is no taxation upon the grant of a nonstatutory stock option if the stock option is granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock on the grant date. Upon exercise, a participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of exercise of the stock option over the exercise price. If the participant is employed by us or one of our
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 81

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL FOUR — AMENDMENT TO JACK IN THE BOX INC. 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
affiliates, that income will be subject to withholding taxes. The participant’s tax basis in those shares will be equal to their fair market value on the date of exercise of the stock option, and the participant’s capital gain holding period for those shares will begin on that date.
We will generally be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the taxable ordinary income realized by the participant.
Incentive Stock Options. The Amended 2004 Plan provides for the grant of stock options that are intended to qualify as “incentive stock options,” as defined in IRC Section 422. Under the IRC, a participant generally is not subject to ordinary income tax upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option. If the participant holds a share received upon exercise of an incentive stock option for more than two years from the date the stock option was granted and more than one year from the date the stock option was exercised, which is referred to as the required holding period, the difference, if any, between the amount realized on a sale or other taxable disposition of that share and the participant’s tax basis in that share will be long-term capital gain or loss.
If, however, a participant disposes of a share acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option before the end of the required holding period, which is referred to as a disqualifying disposition, the participant generally will recognize ordinary income in the year of the disqualifying disposition equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the share on the date of exercise of the stock option over the exercise price. However, if the sales proceeds are less than the fair market value of the share on the date of exercise of the stock option, the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant will not exceed the gain, if any, realized on the sale. If the amount realized on a disqualifying disposition exceeds the fair market value of the share on the date of exercise of the stock option, that excess will be short-term or long-term capital gain, depending on whether the holding period for the share exceeds one year.
For purposes of the alternative minimum tax, the amount by which the fair market value of a share of stock acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option exceeds the exercise price of the stock option generally will be an adjustment included in the participant’s alternative minimum taxable income for the year in which the stock option is exercised. If, however, there is a disqualifying disposition of the share in the year in which the stock option is exercised, there will be no adjustment for alternative minimum tax purposes with respect to that share. In computing alternative minimum taxable income, the tax basis of a share acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option is increased by the amount of the adjustment taken into account with respect to that share for alternative minimum tax purposes in the year the stock option is exercised.
We are not allowed a tax deduction with respect to the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option or the disposition of a share acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option after the required holding period. If there is a disqualifying disposition of a share, however, we will generally be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the taxable ordinary income realized by the participant, provided that either the employee includes that amount in income or we timely satisfy our reporting requirements with respect to that amount.
Stock Appreciation Rights. Generally, if a stock appreciation right is granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock on the grant date, the recipient will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the stock or cash received upon such exercise.
We will generally be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the taxable ordinary income realized by the recipient of the stock appreciation right.
Restricted Stock Awards. Generally, the recipient of a restricted stock award will recognize ordinary income at the time the stock is received equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the stock received over any amount paid by the recipient in exchange for the stock. If, however, the stock is not vested when it is received (for example, if the employee is required to work for a period of time in order to have the right to sell the stock), the recipient generally will not recognize income until the stock becomes vested, at which time the recipient will recognize ordinary income equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the stock on the date it becomes vested over any amount paid by the recipient in exchange for the stock. A recipient may, however, file an election with the Internal Revenue Service, within 30 days following his or her receipt of the stock award, to recognize ordinary income, as of the date the recipient receives the award, equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the stock on the date the award is granted over any amount paid by the recipient for the stock.
The recipient’s basis for the determination of gain or loss upon the subsequent disposition of shares acquired from a restricted stock award will be the amount paid for such shares plus any ordinary income recognized either when the stock is received or when the stock becomes vested.
We will generally be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the taxable ordinary income realized by the recipient of the restricted stock award.
Restricted Stock Unit Awards. Generally, the recipient of a restricted stock unit award structured to comply with the requirements of IRC Section 409A or an exemption to IRC Section 409A will recognize ordinary income at the time the stock is delivered equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the stock received over any amount paid by the recipient in exchange for the stock. To comply with the requirements of IRC Section 409A, the stock subject to a
82 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL FOUR — AMENDMENT TO JACK IN THE BOX INC. 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
restricted stock unit award may generally only be delivered upon one of the following events: a fixed calendar date (or dates), separation from service, death, disability or a change in control. If delivery occurs on another date, unless the restricted stock unit award otherwise complies with or qualifies for an exemption to the requirements of IRC Section 409A, in addition to the tax treatment described above, the recipient will owe an additional 20% federal tax and interest on any taxes owed.
The recipient’s basis for the determination of gain or loss upon the subsequent disposition of shares acquired from a restricted stock unit award will be the amount paid for such shares plus any ordinary income recognized when the stock is delivered.
We will generally be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the taxable ordinary income realized by the recipient of the restricted stock unit award.
IRC Section 162(m). Under IRC Section 162(m), compensation paid to any publicly held corporation’s “covered employees” (as defined under IRC Section 162(m)) that exceeds $1 million per taxable year for any covered employee
is generally non-deductible. Prior to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, compensation that qualified as “performance-based compensation” under IRC Section 162(m) was not subject to this deduction limitation. Pursuant to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, this exception for “performance-based compensation” under IRC Section 162(m) was repealed with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, except that certain transition relief is provided for remuneration provided pursuant to a written binding contract which was in effect on November 2, 2017 and which was not modified in any material respect on or after such date. As a result, compensation paid to any of our “covered employees” in excess of $1 million per taxable year generally will not be deductible unless, among other requirements, it is intended to qualify, and is eligible to qualify, as “performance-based compensation” under IRC Section 162(m) pursuant to the transition relief described above. Because of certain ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of IRC Section 162(m), as well as other factors beyond the control of the Compensation Committee, no assurance can be given that any award granted under the Amended 2004 Plan will be eligible for such transition relief and, therefore, eligible for the “performance-based compensation” exception under IRC Section 162(m).
New Plan Benefits under Amended 2004 Plan
Name and Position
Number of
Shares
Darin S. Harris, Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
33,162(1)
Timothy E. Mullany, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
7,564(1)
Dawn E. Hooper, Vice President, Controller and Financial Reporting (Former Interim Principal Financial Officer)
990(1)
Ryan L. Ostrom, Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer (CMO)
6,982(1)
Dean C. Gordon, Senior Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer (CSCO)
4,656(1)
Steven Piano, Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer (CPO)
4,656(1)
Andrew T. Martin, (Former) Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer
(2)
All current executive officers as a group
75,644(1)
All current directors who are not executive officers as a group
(3)
All employees, including all current officers who are not executive officers, as a group
35,592
(1)
Awards granted under the Amended 2004 Plan to our executive officers and other employees are discretionary and are not subject to set benefits or amounts under the terms of the Amended 2004 Plan. However, as described above in this Proposal Four, on December 16, 2021, the Compensation Committee approved, for a grant date of March 4, 2022, a number of awards of restricted stock units and performance shares to certain employees (including our executive officers) under the Amended 2004 Plan, subject to stockholder approval of this Proposal Four, and the number of shares subject to each such award is indicated in this table.
(2)
Mr. Martin separated employment with the Company on May 7, 2021. Therefore, he is not eligible to receive any future awards under the Amended 2004 Plan.
(3)
Awards granted under the Amended 2004 Plan to our non-employee directors are discretionary and are not subject to set benefits or amounts under the terms of the Amended 2004 Plan. However, pursuant to our current non-employee director compensation program, shortly after each annual meeting of our stockholders, (i) each of our non-employee directors (other than the Chairman) will automatically receive a restricted stock unit award with a value of $90,000 and (ii) the Chairman will automatically receive a restricted stock unit award with a value of $135,000, in each case provided that (a) the director is providing services to the Company on the date of grant and (b) this Proposal Four is approved by our stockholders. The number of shares of Common Stock subject to such awards is determined by dividing the annual equity award value by the closing price of Common Stock on the date of grant and, therefore, is not determinable at this time. On the date of the Annual Meeting, any such awards will be granted under the Amended 2004 Plan if this Proposal Four is approved by our stockholders. For additional information regarding our current non-employee director compensation program, please see “Director Compensation and Stock Ownership Requirements” above.
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 83

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL FOUR — AMENDMENT TO JACK IN THE BOX INC. 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
Plan Benefits under 2004 Plan
The following table sets forth, for each of the individuals and various groups indicated, the total number of shares of Common Stock subject to awards that have been granted (even if not currently outstanding) under the 2004 Plan as of January 7, 2022.
Name and Position
Number of
Shares
Darin S. Harris, Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
37,767
Timothy E. Mullany, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
9,226
Dawn E. Hooper, Vice President, Controller and Financial Reporting (Former Interim Principal Financial Officer)
16,030
Ryan L. Ostrom, Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer (CMO)
6,338
Dean C. Gordon, Senior Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer (CSCO)
47,348
Steven Piano, Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer (CPO)
2,035
Andrew T. Martin, (Former) Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer
18,011
All current executive officers as a group
117,352
All current directors who are not executive officers as a group
265,137
Each nominee for election as a director
David L. Goebel
53,091
Darin S. Harris
37,767
Sharon P. John
7,544
Madeleine A. Kleiner
19,851
Michael W. Murphy
76,462
James M. Myers
27,473
David M. Tehle
76,462
Vivien M. Yeung
4,254
Each associate of any executive officers, current directors or director nominees
Each other person who received or is to receive 5% of awards
All employees, including all current officers who are not executive officers, as a group
​11,086,680
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table summarizes the equity compensation plans under which Common Stock may be issued as of October 3, 2021. Stockholders of the Company have approved all plans requiring such approval.
 
(a) Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights(1)
(b) Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options(1)
(c) Number of securities
remaining for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders(2)
318,874
$92.44
1,898,901
(1)
Includes shares issuable in connection with our outstanding stock options, performance share awards, nonvested stock units, and non-management director deferred stock equivalents. The weighted-average exercise price in column (b) includes the weighted-average exercise price of stock options.
(2)
For a description of our equity compensation plans, refer to Note 13, Share-Based Employee Compensation, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2021.
Vote Required for Approval
Approval requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on such proposal. Abstentions will be included in the number of shares present and entitled to vote and will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” this proposal. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote uninstructed shares on this matter.
ON PROPOSAL FOUR, AMENDMENT TO 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN TO EXTEND DATE BY WHICH AWARDS MAY BE GRANTED THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2022, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL.
84 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL FIVE — STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING VIRTUAL MEETINGS
PROPOSAL FIVE — STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING VIRTUAL MEETINGS
The Company received from The Humane Society of the United States (“HSUS”) the following shareholder proposal (the “HSUS Proposal”) for action at the Annual Meeting. We will promptly provide HSUS’s address, and, to our knowledge, share ownership upon a shareholder’s written request to the Corporate Secretary at Jack in the Box Inc., 9357 Spectrum Center Blvd., San Diego, CA 92123, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
The following text of the HSUS Proposal and supporting statement appears exactly as received by the Company. All statements contained in the HSUS Proposal are the sole responsibility of HSUS:
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Virtual Meetings
Resolved: Shareholders ask that Jack in the Box develop and adopt a policy, and amend its governing documents as necessary, to ensure that moving forward, its annual and special shareholder meetings will be held either in whole or in part through virtual means (i.e., webcast or other on-line system) and that virtual attendance be allowed. This policy should be formally adopted within six months of the 2022 annual meeting and take effect immediately thereafter.
Supporting Statement:
In 2021, Jack in the Box held its annual shareholder meeting via virtual webcast. Just a few of the other major companies which have held their annual shareholder meetings via virtual webcast include: Walmart, Amazon, ExxonMobil, McDonald’s, Facebook, KraftHeinz, Kroger and Apple.
Shareholders support this format and seek to ensure virtual meetings and attendance continue into the future. Please consider the following:
The COVID pandemic has highlighted for many companies the need to ensure continuity of business operations through virtual or remote means. Countless employees have been expected (or even required) to work remotely. Business travel has been dramatically curtailed as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has issued health and safety warnings related to air travel. And meetings of all types have been held virtually in greater numbers than ever before.
Yet under its current by-laws, the company may choose to only hold its annual and special shareholder meetings in-person, requiring attendance to be physical, even in circumstances where the CDC recommends against, or when unexpected conditions prevent, travel.
To put it simply, this is unfair and unnecessary: it increases the health risks for any shareholder who may wish to present a proposal, ask a question, or even just attend such a meeting; for company executives and other employees who may be required to attend; for board members; and for support staff at meeting venues.
It also likely deters attendance by forcing shareholders to choose between protecting their health or risking illness in order to exercise their basic shareholder rights.
The advantages of virtual meetings are significant: they add convenience and reduce time and expenses for shareholders, management, and board members; and they promote wider engagement between the company and shareholders.
Further, virtual meetings contribute to various company social and sustainability policies. They further an inclusive company culture by enabling all shareholders an equal opportunity to participate in annual meetings, regardless of financial, physical, or other barriers. And removing the necessity of all shareholders to travel would provide an environmental benefit to the company’s ESG practices.
The COVID pandemic has fundamentally changed the way companies think about and hold meetings. In addition to the business advantages virtual meetings provide, it is fundamental that shareholders should be allowed to attend meetings and exercise their rights without putting themselves and others at increased risk. And corporate executives and employees, as well as board members, should be allowed to do the same. For this reason, you are encouraged to vote FOR this proposal.
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 85

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL FIVE — STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING VIRTUAL MEETINGS
Vote Required for Approval
Approval requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on such proposal. Abstentions will be included in the number of shares present and entitled to vote and will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” this proposal. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote uninstructed shares on this matter.
ON PROPOSAL FIVE, STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING VIRTUAL MEETINGS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MAKES NO RECOMMENDATION.
86 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL SIX — STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING THE ISSUANCE OF A REPORT ON SUSTAINABLE PACKAGING
PROPOSAL SIX — STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING THE ISSUANCE OF A REPORT ON SUSTAINABLE PACKAGING
The Company received from Green Century Management, Inc. (“Green Century”) the following shareholder proposal (the “Green Century Proposal”) for action at the Annual Meeting. We will promptly provide Green Century’s address, and, to our knowledge, share ownership upon a shareholder’s written request to the Corporate Secretary at Jack in the Box Inc., 9357 Spectrum Center Blvd., San Diego, CA 92123, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
The following text of the Green Century Proposal and supporting statement appears exactly as received by the Company. All statements contained in the Green Century Proposal are the sole responsibility of Green Century:
Whereas: Plastic pollution is a growing problem globally. Only nine percent of all plastic made in the last sixty years has been recycled and an estimated eleven million tons of plastic waste ends up in the ocean every year. Paper packaging is also associated with negative environmental impacts, such as high water and energy use and potential deforestation and forest degradation.
Jack in the Box currently has no public-facing goal or policy related to sustainable packaging, exposing the Company to reputational, regulatory, and competitive risk.
Changing consumer attitudes toward packaging pose reputational risk to the Company. In a recent AdWeek survey, a majority of respondents indicated that they are concerned about pollution from fast food containers. Fifty-five percent expressed a willingness to consider reusable alternatives, including seventy-seven percent of millennial and Gen Z participants. Jack in the Box risks alienating customers, especially the growing segment of young consumers, if it does not respond accordingly.
Regulation of plastics and packaging is gaining momentum across the country, including in states like California, Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington, where Jack in the Box has hundreds of locations. If the Company does not take steps to address packaging sustainability now, it may be forced to in the coming years.
Jack in the Box is a laggard among quick service restaurant chains on sustainable packaging. McDonald’s, Burger King, Taco Bell, Wendy’s, Kentucky Fried Chicken, and Chipotle all have set quantitative, time bound goals to increase the sustainability of their packaging. McDonald’s and Burger King have announced industry-leading partnerships with Loop, a zero waste packaging company, to pilot reusable containers.
By contrast, Jack in the Box received a failing grade in a recent As You Sow report comparing corporate plastics policies, tying for last place out of fifty companies and ranking well behind all of the aforementioned competitors. Investors are concerned that further lack of action on sustainable packaging could pose material risk to the Company and negatively impact shareholder value.
Resolved: Shareholders request that Jack in the Box issue a report, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, discussing if and how the Company could advance its environmental sustainability efforts by developing a comprehensive sustainable packaging policy.
Supporting statement: Proponents defer to management on the content of the report, but suggest that indicators meaningful to shareholders may include any quantitative, time bound goals for:
Eliminating the use of single-use plastics;
Transitioning from single-use to reusable packaging;
Increasing the use of recycled content in plastic and fiber-based packaging;
Increasing the use of responsibly sourced virgin fiber-based packaging, such as Forest Stewardship Council-certified material;
Eliminating problematic plastics, such as black plastic; and
Ensuring all packaging materials are free of toxic PFAS chemicals.
JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT 87

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL SIX — STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING THE ISSUANCE OF A REPORT ON SUSTAINABLE PACKAGING
Company Response to Stockholder Proposal
The Board of Directors has carefully considered this stockholder proposal and recommends that stockholders vote AGAINST this proposal, as it would divert time and resources that the Company has determined would be better used to support our strategy to target our sustainability efforts on areas that will provide the most meaningful impact, without providing a significant corresponding benefit to the Company.
The Board of Directors and our management team recognize the importance of sustainable packaging and that plastic pollution is a significant issue. Understanding that sustainability packaging is increasingly a focus of our stockholders, customers, employees, and stakeholders, we believe that allwe are addressing it in an appropriate manner, as described below. We believe that adopting this proposal and preparing the requested report discussing the Company’s sustainable packaging policy is unnecessary, overly burdensome, and would result in an ineffective use of the Company’s time and resources, especially as we continue to navigate the ongoing impacts that COVID-19 has and continues to have on the restaurant industry, our suppliers (including packaging suppliers), and our restaurants.
Because we recognize the importance of sustainability and reducing plastic pollution, we have taken an active approach to finding sustainable solutions to our packaging. In 2018, our supply chain team formed an Environmental Legislation (“EL”) Team, which is tasked with the responsibility of providing plastic-free and compostable packaging options to support both our company-owned and franchised restaurants. This EL Team meets biweekly and reviews local, state, and federal packaging developments and regulations in order to offer alternatives, substitutions, and next steps to our restaurants. The team’s efforts have included sourcing and approving compostable packaging alternatives (including, but not limited to, compostable platters, bowls, lids, straws, utensils and carryout bags) that have been made available and implemented at several of our restaurants across California, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington.
In addition to our EL Team, we also have formed a cross-functional New Packaging Menu Team with members represented from product marketing, product development, supply chain, food safety and regulatory compliance, operations, and more. This particular team continues to explore innovative measures to support limited-time offers and special menu items, as well as reduce packaging waste and improve our operational efficiency.
We do not believe that preparation of the report requested by this proposal would itself improve the Company’s performance, nor would it further mitigate plastic pollution or increase returns to stockholder. Instead, the creation of such reports requireda report would divert time, effort, attention, and valuable resources away from our active efforts to continue to evaluate and source additional sustainable packaging options, thereby limiting our ability to target our efforts on the areas that will provide the most meaningful impact to our overall sustainability progress. We do not object to transparency in this area, and we will evaluate what meaningful steps we can take and how best to measure them going forward, though we believe this requested report to be filedpremature.
While we believe the proposal is both unnecessary and contrary to the best interests of our shareholders, we believe that it was made in good faith, and we invite and welcome continued input from, and engagement with, our stockholders on sustainable packaging. The Board will take the results of the vote into consideration, together with any other input from our stockholders and other relevant factors, as well as our Board of Directors’ fiduciary obligations to act in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, in making its decision regarding reporting.
Vote Required for Approval
Approval requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on such persons during fiscal 2017 were filedproposal. Abstentions will be included in the number of shares present and entitled to vote and will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” this proposal. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote uninstructed shares on a timely basis.this matter.
ON PROPOSAL SIX, STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING THE ISSUANCE OF A REPORT ON SUSTAINABLE PACKAGING, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “AGAINST” THIS PROPOSAL.
88 JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OTHER INFORMATION

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

OTHER INFORMATION

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

It is the Company’s policy that the Audit Committee approve or ratify transactions involving the Company and its directors, executive officers or principal stockholders or members of their immediate families or entities controlled by any of them or in which they have a substantial ownership interest in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and that are otherwise reportable under SEC disclosure rules.

During fiscal year 2017,2021, the Company was not a party to a transaction or series of transactions in which the amount involved did or may exceed $120,000 in which any of its directors, named executive officers or other executive officers, any holder of more than 5% of its Common Stock or any member of the immediate family of any of these persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than the compensation arrangements (including with respect to equity compensation) described in “Executive Compensation” above.

JACK IN THE BOX INC.ï  2018 PROXY STATEMENT69


LOGO

JACK IN THE BOX INC.

9330 BALBOA AVENUE

SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123

LOGO

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before thecut-off  |   date or meeting date. Follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE2022 PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically viaSTATEMENT e-mail89 or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE -1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before thecut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

APPENDIX A—RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASUREMENTS TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

GAAP RESULTS
E16496-P84132                KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

— — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — —

APPENDIX A—RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASUREMENTS TO GAAP RESULTS
This Proxy Statement contains information regarding Adjusted EBITDA, Restaurant-Level Margin Franchise-Level Margin, and Operating EBIT, which are non-GAAP financial measures. Management believes that these measurements, when viewed with the Company’s results of operations in accordance with GAAP and the accompanying reconciliations in the tables below, provide useful information about operating performance and period-over-period changes, and provide additional information that is useful for evaluating the operating performance of the company’s core business without regard to potential distortions. Additionally, Operating EBIT were used by the Compensation Committee in determining annual incentive targets further discussed in the Proxy Statement.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA represents net earnings on a GAAP basis excluding earnings or losses from discontinued operations, income taxes, interest expense, net, gains or losses on the sale of company-operated restaurants, impairment and other charges, net, depreciation and amortization, the amortization of franchise tenant improvement allowances and other, and pension settlement charges. Adjusted EBITDA should be considered as a supplement to, not as a substitute for, analysis of results as reported under U.S. GAAP or other similarly titled measures of other companies. Management believes Adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors to gain an understanding of the factors and trends affecting the company’s ongoing cash earnings, from which capital investments are made and debt is serviced.
Below is a reconciliation of non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net earnings (in thousands).
 
FY Ended
 
October 3,
2021
(53 weeks)
September 27,
2020
(52 weeks)
Net earnings — GAAP
$165,755
$89,764
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
(370)
Income taxes
55,852
32,727
Interest expense, net
67,458
66,743
Pension settlement charges
39,218
Gains on the sale of company-operated restaurants
(4,203)
(3,261)
Impairment and other gains, net
(3,382)
(6,493)
Depreciation and amortization
46,500
52,798
Amortization of franchise tenant improvement allowances and other
3,450
3,028
Adjusted EBITDA — Non-GAAP
$331,430
$274,154
Restaurant Level Margin
Restaurant-Level Margin is defined as company restaurant sales less restaurant operating costs (food and packaging, labor, and occupancy costs) and is neither required by, nor presented in accordance with GAAP. Restaurant-Level Margin excludes revenues and expenses of our franchise operations and certain costs, such as selling, general, and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, impairment and other charges, net, gains or losses on the sale of company-operated restaurants, and other costs that are considered normal operating costs. As such, Restaurant-Level Margin is not indicative of the overall results of the company and does not accrue directly to the benefit of shareholders because of the exclusion of corporate-level expenses. Restaurant-Level Margin should be considered as a supplement to, not as a substitute for, analysis of results as reported under GAAP or other similarly titled measures of other companies. The company is presenting Restaurant-Level Margin because it believes that it provides a meaningful supplement to net earnings of the company’s core business operating results, as well as a comparison to those of other similar companies. Management utilizes Restaurant-Level Margin as a key performance indicator to evaluate the profitability of company-owned restaurants.
        DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED.                        

JACK IN THE BOX INC.

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR all 9 nominees listed and FOR proposals 2 and 3.

    1.

Election of Directors

ForAgainstAbstain

Nominees:

ForAgainstAbstain

1a.   Leonard A. Comma

1b.  David L. Goebel

1c.  Sharon P. John

2.

3.

Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accountants.

Advisory approval of executive compensation.

1d.  Madeleine A. Kleiner

1e.  Michael W. Murphy

1f.  James M. Myers

1g.  David M. Tehle

1h.  John T. Wyatt

NOTE:In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

1i. Vivien M. Yeung

For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.
YesNo
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT A-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Important Notice Regarding

APPENDIX A—RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASUREMENTS TO GAAP RESULTS
Below is a reconciliation of non-GAAP Restaurant-Level Margin to the Availabilitymost directly comparable GAAP measure, earnings from operations (in thousands):
 
FY Ended
 
October 3,
2021
(53 weeks)
September 27,
2020
(52 weeks)
Earnings from operations — GAAP
$289,946
$230,584
Franchise rental revenues
(346,634)
(320,647)
Franchise royalties and other
(204,725)
(178,319)
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services
(204,545)
(173,553)
Franchise occupancy expenses
214,913
210,038
Franchise support and other costs
13,052
13,059
Franchise advertising and other services expenses
210,328
180,794
Selling, general and administrative expenses
82,734
80,841
Impairment and other gains, net
(3,382)
(6,493)
Gains on the sale of company-operated restaurants
(4,203)
(3,261)
Depreciation and amortization
46,500
52,798
Restaurant-Level Margin — Non-GAAP
$93,984
$85,841
Company restaurant sales
$387,766
$348,987
Restaurant-Level Margin % — Non-GAAP
24.2%
24.6%
Franchise Level Margin
Franchise-Level Margin is defined as franchise revenues less franchise operating costs (occupancy expenses, advertising contributions, and franchise support and other costs) and is neither required by, nor presented in accordance with GAAP. Franchise-Level Margin excludes revenue and expenses of Proxy Materialsour company-operated restaurants and certain costs, such as selling, general, and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, impairment and other charges, net, and other costs that are considered normal operating costs. As such, Franchise-Level Margin is not indicative of the overall results of the company and does not accrue directly to the benefit of shareholders because of the exclusion of corporate-level expenses. Franchise-Level Margin should be considered as a supplement to, not as a substitute for, analysis of results as reported under GAAP or other similarly titled measures of other companies. The company is presenting Franchise-Level Margin because it believes that it provides a meaningful supplement to net earnings of the Annual Meeting:

The Proxy Statement andcompany's core business operating results, as well as a comparison to those of other similar companies. Management utilizes Franchise-Level Margin as a key performance indicator to evaluate the 2017 Annual Report on Form10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.

— — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — —

E16497-P84132      

profitability of our franchise operations.

A-2 JACK IN THE BOX INC.

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

February 27, 2018, 8:30 a.m., Pacific Time

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT


TABLE OF CONTENTS

APPENDIX A—RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASUREMENTS TO GAAP RESULTS
Below is a reconciliation of non-GAAP Franchise-Level Margin to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, earnings from operations (in thousands):
 
FY Ended
 
October 3,
2021
(53 weeks)
September 27,
2020
(52 weeks)
Earnings from operations - GAAP
$289,946
$230,584
Company restaurant sales
(387,766)
(348,987)
Food and packaging
113,006
102,449
Payroll and employee benefits
119,033
106,540
Occupancy and other
61,743
54,157
Selling, general and administrative expenses
82,734
80,841
Impairment and other gains, net
(3,382)
(6,493)
Gains on the sale of company-operated restaurants
(4,203)
(3,261)
Depreciation and amortization
46,500
52,798
Franchise-Level Margin - Non-GAAP
$317,611
$268,628
Franchise rental revenues
$346,634
$320,647
Franchise royalties and other
204,725
178,319
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services
204,545
173,553
Total franchise revenues
$755,904
$672,519
Franchise-Level Margin % - Non-GAAP
42.0%
39.9%
Operating EBIT
Operating EBIT represents net earnings on a GAAP basis excluding income taxes, interest expense, net, gains or losses on the sale of company-operated restaurants, pension and postretirement expense, restructuring charges and mark-to-market changes in the cash surrender value of company owned life insurance (“COLI”) policies, net of a deferred compensation obligation supported by these policies. Operating EBIT is one of the metrics used in determining payouts under the 2021 Annual Incentives.
Below is a reconciliation of non-GAAP Operating EBIT to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net earnings (in thousands).
FY Ended
October 3,
2021
(53 weeks)
Net earnings — GAAP

The undersigned hereby appoints Leonard A. Comma

$165,755
Income taxes
55,852
Interest expense, net
67,458
Pension and Phillip H. Rudolph, and each of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies andattorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as providedpostretirement expense
881
Gains on the other side, all the sharessale of Jack in the Box Inc. Common Stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote, and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the company to be held February 27, 2018, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present at the Annual Meeting.

THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, OR IF NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED, WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF ALL DIRECTORS AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 3.

In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

company-operated restaurants
(4,203)
Restructuring charges
7
Gains on COLI policies, net

Address Changes/Comments:  

(9,141)
Operating EBIT — Non-GAAP
$276,609

(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

Continued and to be signed on reverse side

JACK IN THE BOX INC.  |  2022 PROXY STATEMENT A-3

V.1.1TABLE OF CONTENTS



TABLE OF CONTENTS